General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDaylight Savings Time - Where do you stand?
I could make an argument for any of the options in my poll, but I wonder how DU feels.
84 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Make it year round | |
15 (18%) |
|
Do away with it altogether | |
50 (60%) |
|
Continue with Spring Forward, Fall Back | |
19 (23%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Coventina
(28,062 posts)And I like it that way.
boston bean
(36,568 posts)Celerity
(47,401 posts)and then really starts to kick in.
Or basically no true daylight in the northern part of the country for a month or so (polar night), lolol.
Northern Norway and Finland are even worse.
Regions within the Arctic Circle go into polar night early December and will stay there for a while up to 179 days right at the pole. Polar night is when the sun does not rise, but in most cases in the Arctic Circle it manifests in permanent twilight, getting darker the more north and the closer to the pole you go.
'Noon' in Svalbard in January. It is the large Arctic archipelago belonging to Norway. It displaces more of the surface of the earth than Great Britain when you count the waters within its furthest land borders for the 6 largest parts (Spetsbergen, Nordaustlandet, Edgeøya, Barentsøya, Vitön, and Prins Karls Forland), not even counting its more remote smaller islands:
same scale
W_HAMILTON
(8,621 posts)I wish we would just stay on whatever we are on right now. I like it when it gets dark super early in December/January.
Ohio Joe
(21,894 posts)Now that every clock I have auto changes, I dont even notice it.
Bettie
(17,553 posts)it isn't really a huge deal to me.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,752 posts)Wounded Bear
(61,050 posts)or any year thereafter.
I'd stay on standard time year round.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,752 posts)Standard time year round
Wounded Bear
(61,050 posts)People in the southern half of the country don't realize just how fucking short days are in winter. Shifting the clock even farther into the wee hours of the morning in the dead of winter at 48 degrees north latitude would really suck.
Polybius
(18,829 posts)No thanks, sun will go down after 8:30.
Ace Rothstein
(3,308 posts)That's what time the sun would rise in Chicago for about 2 months every summer. Hard pass.
Ms. Toad
(35,759 posts)I don't care at all where the clock is set. Just stop messing with it twice a year.
It would be helpful to have that option, since the poll doesn't have a single option I could choose over the others. My choice would be NOT option 3.
Celerity
(47,401 posts)the further north you go, Stockholm is fairly far south in Sweden, see the map below) soon starts to come at 2 or 3 PM. Also, now (until we go to DST in a few weeks), as the months flow by, the sun starts to come up so so early. It already has been starting to get light around 5 AM to 5 30 AM , whilst still starting to get dark around 430 PM to 5 PM. I hate it.
The whole 'oh the children need to the light to go to school in the morning' argument is bullshit, as even with the fall-back to standard time, it is still dark out for months when they go, and it would eventually be completely light out, even on DST, like it is now.
I so so want year-round DST.
Deuxcents
(20,519 posts)Not everyone will be happy but get over this nonsense. Its not healthy n its a pain in the a$$
louis-t
(23,862 posts)I do hate waking up in the dark, though.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Response to 11 Bravo (Original post)
Silent3 This message was self-deleted by its author.
hlthe2b
(107,392 posts)That isn't included as an option, I don't think--although maybe that's what you mean with the choice "Do Away with it altogether?"
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)thank you
hlthe2b
(107,392 posts)(American Academy of Sleep experts)
https://aasm.org/american-academy-of-sleep-medicine-calls-for-elimination-of-daylight-saving-time/
American Academy of Sleep Medicine calls for elimination of daylight saving time
DARIEN, IL Public health and safety would benefit from eliminating daylight saving time, according to a position statement from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
The AASM supports a switch to permanent standard time, explaining in the statement that standard time more closely aligns with the daily rhythms of the bodys internal clock. The position statement also cites evidence of increased risks of motor vehicle accidents, cardiovascular events, and mood disturbances following the annual spring forward to daylight saving time.
Permanent, year-round standard time is the best choice to most closely match our circadian sleep-wake cycle, said lead author Dr. M. Adeel Rishi, a pulmonology, sleep medicine and critical care specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, and vice chair of the AASM Public Safety Committee. Daylight saving time results in more darkness in the morning and more light in the evening, disrupting the bodys natural rhythm.
The position statement, published online as an accepted paper in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, outlines the acute effects of daylight saving time, which range from increased risk of stroke and hospital admissions to sleep loss and increased production of inflammatory markers, one of the bodys responses to stress. In addition, studies show that traffic fatalities have increased as much as six percent in the first few days following the change to daylight saving time, and a recently published research abstract found an 18 percent increase in adverse medical events related to human error in the week after switching to daylight saving time.
There is ample evidence of the negative, short-term consequences of the annual change to daylight saving time in the spring, said AASM President Dr. Kannan Ramar. Because the adoption of permanent standard time would be beneficial for public health and safety, the AASM will be advocating at the federal level for this legislative change.
In July, an AASM survey of more than 2,000 U.S. adults found that 63 percent support the elimination of seasonal time changes in favor of a national, fixed, year-round time, and only 11 percent oppose it. Additionally, a 2019 survey by the AASM found that 55 percent of adults feel extremely or somewhat tired after the spring change to daylight saving time.
The AASM position statement on daylight saving time has been endorsed by the following organizations
ASM found that 55 percent of adults feel extremely or somewhat tired after the spring change to daylight saving time.
The AASM position statement on daylight saving time has been endorsed by the following organizations:
American Academy of Cardiovascular Sleep Medicine
American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine
American Association of Sleep Technologists
American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST)
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
California Sleep Society
Dakotas Sleep Society
Kentucky Sleep Society
Maryland Sleep Society
Michigan Academy of Sleep Medicine
Missouri Sleep Society
National PTA
National Safety Council
Society for Research on Biological Rhythms
Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine
Society of Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Southern Sleep Society
Start School Later
Tennessee Sleep Society
Wisconsin Sleep Society
World Sleep Society.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)Yields nothing remotely like scientific consensus. Here's a couple of links but there are plentiful others arguing both ways based on both environmental and health grounds (the primary health benefit being increased exposure to sunlight year round offsetting the circadian rhythm argument you cite.)
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a18011/in-defense-of-daylight-saving-time/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-daylight-saving-times-save-energy/
hlthe2b
(107,392 posts)including all the groups who signed off.
Obviously, you didn't take the time to read it and my efforts with time I didn't have were not appreciated. I will not bother next time.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)And there are multiple facets to the debate not just sleep studies. A google search provides a myriad of sources on both sides and addressing many aspects. Perhaps I should have responded with that initially rather than asking for sources. Sorry you feel your time was wasted. Have a good night.
Ms. Toad
(35,759 posts)calling for "a national fixed, year-round time" rather than on which version of time (DST or ST) is used. In other words, pick one and stick with it.
Am I missing something?
11 Bravo
(24,081 posts)hlthe2b
(107,392 posts)see my other post
twodogsbarking
(12,351 posts)Blues Heron
(6,271 posts)Most critters follow the suns natural progression and get up earlier in the summer which is what dst is intended for. No animals get up at exactly the same time each day of the year.
Keep it or experiment with not doing it either is fine with me.
phylny
(8,626 posts)workers, parents with young children and babies, and pet owners
the sun would still be up past ten at night on DST during part of year.
Rebl2
(15,241 posts)Standard time. Doctors say its better for our body. Dont know that I completely understand why, but they know better than me.
canetoad
(18,427 posts)Early riser, I love to be out with the dog the minute it's light.
Polybius
(18,829 posts)I like 8:30 sundowns in the Summer. I don't care about dark mornings, since I sleep till 11 anyway.
electric_blue68
(19,406 posts)previously about so dark in the morning for school kids if that happens. That concerns me.
At least for me in NYC I love our long 🧡 lit evenings!
I especially hate the sun setting at 4:30 - 5:30 between late Nov through around Feb something.
I have S.A.D. (Winter, there is a Summer variety it seems) so it really lowers my energy level in general.
Doing the 'spring forward' switch didn't bother me too much even when I was working. Though once in a while I'd feel weird going to sleep relatively soon after the sun set 8:30PM ish only 4 hours later vs 5 hours.
patphil
(7,253 posts)AllaN01Bear
(23,674 posts)or overulled in the state house or the courts .
hunter
(39,160 posts)If I was Emperor of Earth there would only be one time and everyone would have to adapt locally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Time
Raine
(30,669 posts)Hekate
(95,740 posts)Grey
(1,584 posts)split the difference and adjust our clocks by half an hour and stop all the fuss.
electric_blue68
(19,406 posts)Renew Deal
(83,347 posts)Mostly in Asia and parts of Australia. I think that's too confusing.
https://www.timeanddate.com/time/time-zones-interesting.html
Raine
(30,669 posts)Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)Makes the most sense. Aligning the standard work day to the daylight hours makes the most sense.
Golden Raisin
(4,694 posts)My personal preference would be for Standard.
haele
(13,740 posts)All the old saws about adding an hour for school kids or farmers wasn't what it was about. It was a Chamber of Commerce initiative to keep people out later when there was more sunlight so as to spend their way to a better local economy, especially after the rise of automobiles made it more convenient to stay out later.
Haele
Kaleva
(38,779 posts)Renew Deal
(83,347 posts)I understand why it is the way it is and I don't think it's a big deal. If it changes, it should probably be standard time all the time because kids would have to go to school in the dark during parts of the year.
Silver Swan
(1,111 posts)I moved from the western part of the Eastern time zone to the eastern part of the Central time zone.
I have come to love the early sunsets in December. I look forward to them every year. I would hate to give them up. I would also NOT enjoy the late sunrise in the winter that would result from year round daylight savings time.
I have let my congressman know of my feelings more than once, but have never received a reply.
llmart
(16,331 posts)I think daylight savings time is just another example of humans trying to control Mother Nature. If we don't like it that part of the year it gets dark so early or that little Johnny and Susie might have to get on the bus in the dark then maybe we should examine some of our cultural norms. Is it really true any longer that work is 8-5 and during the light of day? Maybe re-examine school bus schedules?
We saw during the pandemic and the last couple of years all sorts of accommodations made to the work force and schooling, some of the changes will just stay with us such as the working from home option.
I guess if I had to choose it would be keep standard time all year long, though I'm retired and just go to bed and get up whenever regardless of the time on the bedside clock.
Polybius
(18,829 posts)It's all I've ever known, I don't want it to change.
Meowmee
(6,485 posts)Meaning I never get back to any kind of normal for me. I would like it abandoned for good. I prefer the time system which gives more light later in the warmer months here, without any change each year, to stay in place all year.
betsuni
(27,372 posts)Bad.
My parents were idiots and every year until we children were old enough to know to reset the damn clocks on our own, they'd arrive at church an hour early or an hour late depending on the season. Morons.
Kaleva
(38,779 posts)I'm an early riser but I don't care for starting work at 5:30 am.
Conjuay
(2,247 posts)we move it one half hour and leave it at that?
neither one or tuther
Emile
(31,628 posts)area51
(12,222 posts)twodogsbarking
(12,351 posts)That's all I have to say about that.