Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Dorian Gray

(13,493 posts)
4. I don't think he started the storm
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 07:38 AM
Mar 2023

but he added greatly to it. His "rec" made the biggest news and caused the most panic.

What kills me here is that all these companies run payroll for their employees through this bank. (And other banks that may be affected, like First Republic and Signature.) And it isn't only silicon valley companies. People are quick to say: Let them fail, and I understand the instinct.

Best case scenario is that SVB finds a "buyer" (more like forced takeover) for it's commercial banking arm and people can still run payroll for their companies. Let SVB become obsolete without hurting the population.

 

Shanti Shanti Shanti

(12,047 posts)
3. If other banks go under on a Monday panic the whole house of cards could tumble
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 07:30 AM
Mar 2023

Several regional banks are likely to go under from what I've heard, this won't be an isolated case

DVRacer

(707 posts)
5. I won't pretend to understand all of this
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 07:50 AM
Mar 2023

But people smarter than me are saying this has to do with the sharp rise in interest rates from the Fed. I see that is also hurting the housing market and car market with rates double what they were and lenders saying no to people not A+ credit.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,587 posts)
7. SVB had the same info on rate hikes as all the other banks
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 11:01 AM
Mar 2023

But chose to handle it differently, buying bonds, then selling them for a loss to raise capital.

usonian

(9,778 posts)
8. They were un-hedged against interest rate rises.
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 11:06 AM
Mar 2023

Flew under the scrutiny demanded of large banks so as to play risky games, it seems.

More here. In more detail than I can fathom.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217719896

Fiendish Thingy

(15,587 posts)
6. Sorry Schiff, no bailouts beyond FDIC max to depositors
Sun Mar 12, 2023, 10:59 AM
Mar 2023

Sure, the government can try to find a buyer for SVB, but if the bank folds, the 6,500 employees will have to go on unemployment, just like when a factory closes, or a tech firm lays off thousands (which has happened several times recently) and doesn’t get a taxpayer funded bailout.

That’s not going to cause a run on other banks- SVB’s specialty was raising and disbursing large amounts of venture capital to tech start ups. Their cash on hand fluctuated wildly. They lobbied congress hard to change the rules about cash liquidity, and, with the same information all the banks had about the feds planned interest hikes, gambled with their assets and lost.

SVB was not like George Bailey’s savings & loan.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Schiff on Silicon Va...