General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow. Just wow.
https://hartmannreport.com/p/can-we-stop-the-greed-heads-from?utm_source=substack&utm_mediumCan We Stop the Greed-Heads From Their Destruction of Banking & More? Thom Hartmann
'The CEO of SVB didnt like the regulations imposed after the 2008 financial meltdown by Congress Dodd-Frank legislation, and spent over a half-million dollars bribing er, influencing legislators (legalized by 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court) to change the law and exempt his and other smaller, regional banks from what he argued was the heavy hand of government.
As Senator Bernie Sanders noted this weekend: Let's be clear. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank is a direct result of an absurd 2018 bank deregulation bill signed by Donald Trump that I strongly opposed. Five years ago, the Republican Director of the Congressional Budget Office released a report finding that this legislation would increase the likelihood that a large financial firm with assets of between $100 billion and $250 billion would fail.'
As usual there's a lot of good history in this Hartmann Report. Read on...
roamer65
(36,745 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,853 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(5,113 posts)usonian
(9,766 posts)allegorical oracle
(2,357 posts)SalviaBlue
(2,915 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,148 posts)fiasco, well whah. sorry mr chairman. u loose.
Old Crank
(3,569 posts)The head of Lehman Bros.
republianmushroom
(13,576 posts)Why wasn't the Dodd-Frank legislation changed back to the original form in 2021 ?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)It is argued that the costs for compliance were onerous for smaller banks.
I would think that there has to be less expensive options for stress testing given current software capabilities.
Probatim
(2,525 posts)Pretty remarkable that assets of $100bn to $250bn classifies you as a smaller bank.
ECL213
(212 posts)while the lives around him are destroyed.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Thom saw this coming from miles away.
progressoid
(49,978 posts)czarjak
(11,266 posts)"Ronald Reagan proved that debt doesn't matter." Dick Cheney
If most of the wealth goes to the top, there's less for everyone else. Screw that Jesus stuff. Ask Rushbo.
flying_wahini
(6,589 posts)Beastly Boy
(9,307 posts)other Socialist Democrats.
Hartmann no longer refers to all mainstream Democrats as "neoliberal" as he used to do in the past. Only some of them now, a change in his narrative that I can agree with.
He is also now talking about regulation rather than revolution as an effective means to remedy the excesses of corporatism, something he mocked in the past as "incrementalism" and "middle of the road".
Who knows, if things continue to go in the same direction, I may reconsider ignoring Hartmann at some time in the future.
residentcynic
(32 posts)When Democrats talk about a safety net, they're talking about something to keep the elderly and poor from being swept out to the curb. When repubs talk about a safety net, they're talking about making sure businesses that take unreasonable risks to grow can be rescued by the government. There's your difference.
erronis
(15,237 posts)chamber-of-commerce companies are supported, they aren't as important as the major industrial giants, the huge financial firms, the defense and medical complexes.
SWBTATTReg
(22,112 posts)happen more easily, w/ less restraints on the banking industry that they put in place. What's the tally thus far of bank victims? 4 or 5?
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)Corporate Fascist Tyranny, without massive Corporate bribes, Corporate Campaign Donations, and massive Corporate Lobbying.
pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)what could go wrong. we gotta invest social security in the wall street casino.
twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(7,896 posts)Biden over this.