Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(8,237 posts)
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 03:55 PM Mar 2023

Ian Millhiser @imillhiser: in the likely event that Trump Judge Matty Kascmaryk bans mifepristone

Ian Millhiser
@imillhiser

So in the likely event that Trump Judge Matty Kascmaryk bans mifepristone, here’s what we can expect next:
🧵

DOJ will seek an emergency stay from the Fifth Circuit as fast as it can review Matty’s opinion and draft a motion. They will likely lose. The Fifth Circuit is dominated by highly-partisan Republicans like Kyle Duncan.

Then it goes to SCOTUS. I think there’s a real chance that SCOTUS grants a stay — there is no legal basis whatsoever for banning mifepristone, which was approved 23 years ago. The statute of limitations to file this suit is six years.

However, the GOP-controlled SCOTUS’s practice, when the Biden administration asks for an emergency stay from a hack judge like Kascmaryk has been to deny the request. So there’s a real risk that Matty’s order could remain in effect for months or more.

If SCOTUS denies the temporary stay, the question of whether to permanently reverse Matty will still be on appeal. The Fifth Circuit gets the first shot. And it may intentionally delay its ruling to leave Matty’s decision in place for as possible. DOJ will likely lose again.

Most likely after the Fifth Circuit rules, SCOTUS will hear it again. I would be surprised if even this SCOTUS allows such a lawless order to remain in effect forever, but there’s no guarantee DOJ wins.

Depending on what Matty the K’s opinion says, FDA may also try to bypass him by reapproving mifepristone. Although I’m told that process could also take months.

So buckle up. Looks like shit is about to get super lawless.



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ian Millhiser @imillhiser: in the likely event that Trump Judge Matty Kascmaryk bans mifepristone (Original Post) In It to Win It Mar 2023 OP
It wouldn't surprise me to read that the judge's order requires the FDA to pre-vet their re-approval in2herbs Mar 2023 #1
If they thought women turned out in 2022 just wait. CrispyQ Mar 2023 #2
The time is here... 2naSalit Mar 2023 #4
So less safe off use of drugs that aid in terminations of pregnancies may become more common Freethinker65 Mar 2023 #3
If the statute of limitations is six years and it was approved 23 years ago, why isn't it thrown out LonePirate Mar 2023 #5
I'll keep fingers crossed................ Lovie777 Mar 2023 #6

in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
1. It wouldn't surprise me to read that the judge's order requires the FDA to pre-vet their re-approval
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 04:02 PM
Mar 2023

with him.

Biden needs to issue and EO and he needs to fire the Walgreens exec he just recently appointed to some position. (I don't remember the details and am not going to research. If you don't believe me, do your own research.)

Freethinker65

(10,010 posts)
3. So less safe off use of drugs that aid in terminations of pregnancies may become more common
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 04:17 PM
Mar 2023

Like the Hollywood types use of the diabetes drug Ozempic to lose weight... Or those using Viagra for erectile dysfunction before it was approved for that use.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ian Millhiser @imillhiser...