General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Fox as a network should never be on bases.
DENVERPOPS
(8,813 posts)Ever since Reagan got rid of the Fairness Doctrine??????????
Hell, these assholes might as well broadcast the Russian, State Owned, News channel....(PRAVDA)
Celerity
(43,330 posts)BComplex
(8,046 posts)Those prisoners literally CANNOT get away from hearing whatever the guards put on the tv. Fuz Nooz has got to be banned, as many of those prisoners are already fairly militant.
HUAJIAO
(2,383 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,131 posts)Haggis 4 Breakfast
(1,453 posts)you can find if you dig around. It's about 2 minutes long.
Vote Vets !! Donate if you can.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)How would they ban particular programming, or even particular channels on military bases?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Is put a ban on having those channels tuned in on TVs that are in work facilities. They cant ban them from cable systems, nor can they stop military members from having Fox News in their homes on base.
Grins
(7,217 posts)Fox is banned.
See how easy it is!
cbabe
(3,541 posts)Talitha
(6,582 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Can already do that I have zero interest in the government mandating what businesses can or cant show on their TVs.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,369 posts)Who would do the banning?
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Ferryboat
(922 posts)No one has ever objected, many have thanked me. Be Bold!
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)Although I have been to a few offices where they hide the remote on purpose.
republianmushroom
(13,588 posts)Beachnutt
(7,315 posts)St Amant vs Thompson 1968
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/604/st-amant-v-thompson
Court said 'reckless disregard' means person seriously doubted truth, published anyway
https://www.reuters.com/legal/fox-news-must-face-smartmatics-lawsuit-over-election-rigging-claims-2023-02-14/
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Beachnutt
(7,315 posts)against fox for defamation of the United States Government based on lies and falsehoods under wreckless disregard for truth and ban fox from airing on all Government property and kick them out of the press pool ?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Beachnutt
(7,315 posts)should weigh in on this
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/604/st-amant-v-thompson
onenote
(42,700 posts)they would have to be defamatory to the reputation of an individual or organization to be actionable and....
the gov
more importantly, they can only be addressed "after the fact" via a suit for damages... the government can't "ban' a speaker from speaking in the future because of past unprotected speech (to say nothing of the fact that not every statement made by the speaker in the past was unprotected ).
So, no, bans by the government aren't going to work.
Cherokee100
(266 posts)It's the same in some large corporations. Fox would on in our break rooms. I was the fantom, who would change the channel.
InstantGratification
(158 posts)The owner of a local business almost always tunes to FOX. I joked told the owner's son that he should turn on parental controls and block that channel...
jaxexpat
(6,818 posts)Every TeeVee and radio on the base that I saw was tuned to Fox news, American talk radio and Limbaugh. When I asked Sgt. son-in-law why that was, he replied, "the base commander has requested that all personnel stay on the same page". They watched Fox at home and were emersed in it at their "office". It was like the inescapable backdrop to their lives. I observed no awareness on their part that they were being blatantly brainwashed. I saw no sign that they understood it was propaganda, because it was working just as Pavlov said it would.
I guess I was most shocked and disgusted when my stepdaughter and son-in-law said they preferred Fox because it was "more American". I was beyond words. Took a short hike through the German countryside to let the steam in my mind dissipate.
Crowman2009
(2,494 posts)It would either be that disaster video show "Caught On Tape" on local TV, a movie that received less than 5-stars on IMDB (because nobody would steal those, along with books & board games), or one of those variety programs on Univision or Telemundo. Nobody wanted to watch some dick in a suit read the news.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)I don't want my $155 per month payment to Verizon Fios becoming a subsidy for Rupert Murdoch's lies.
Get them off the TV screens of America, unless the individual cable customers agree to pay EXTRA to receive that horrible collection of stations.
Zorro
(15,740 posts)Time to get the cable providers to remove Fox News from their basic lineup and make it an add-on subscription for those who want to watch it. It can be done.
onenote
(42,700 posts)You say "it can be done." Please elaborate.
Oppaloopa
(867 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)And they say that it can happen. My question is how do they think they can make that happen.
Zorro
(15,740 posts)I've written to my service provider exactly that.
If there's enough of their customers who express their disagreement with enabling Fox News with their monthly payment, I think the carriers just might decide to make Fox a subscription add-on instead of being bundled with all the other programming. There's a good case being made that it's a misleading propaganda network, with all the revelations coming out in the Dominion lawsuit, and there's already a move afoot to get Fox News removed from the Armed Forces network.
After all, there's already plenty of free streaming content available that are great alternatives to making a monthly donation to maintain Fox on one's provider offerings.
onenote
(42,700 posts)The cable operator can't just "decide" to make Fox News a "subscription add-on". They have contracts -- typically multi-year contracts with Fox in which Fox licenses its services as a bundle that includes not only Fox News, but also other Fox-owned properties, including its owned and operated broadcast stations, Fox Business, and the Fox Sports channels. As a result, Fox has the leverage to demand basic tier carriage since cable operators aren't going to drop all of those services and watch a sizable portion of their customer base migrate to another provider that offers those services.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)Youtube tv streaming just raised their prices. I told them to keep my prices the same and get rid of all Fux channels - that will save them more than enough.
Keep faux news out f VA medical facilities. I remember faux constantly on at VA Mather during Shrub's administration. Fucking disgusting. I am not sure when this stopped. Now what I see in nature slide shows and in at least one clinic, Gunsmoke. No one, left or right can argue about Gunsmoke. The good guys always won. I grew up watching that morality and believing it.
It seems now that many feel that one is a "Good Guy" ONLY if one wins.... regardless of morality.
librechik
(30,674 posts)orleans
(34,051 posts)and because of that, the military won't be seeing it
Initech
(100,065 posts)It's everywhere and it's damn near impossible to get rid of it all, and no matter how much you try to clean it up, you still find remnants of it months later.
liberalla
(9,243 posts)albacore
(2,398 posts)Just be surreptitious about it, and you can turn the damn thing off. If they turn it back on... hit it again. They'll think the TV is broken.
Waiting rooms don't have to be infested with Fox.
Cha
(297,154 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Do it!..Ban them!
brewens
(13,575 posts)harder.
JETTBHEART
(33 posts)This makes me happy. I
keithbvadu2
(36,778 posts)Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is Essential to Feature Tucker Carlson
.