General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRon DeSantis' plan to take control of Disney's land backfired spectacularly
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ron-desantis-plan-control-disneys-025925431.htmlGov. Ron DeSantis gained control of Walt Disney World's oversight district board in February.
The move was an attempt to strip the company's self-governing power that it has enjoyed for decades.
But a previously signed agreement may have rendered the new governing board powerless.
Gov. Ron DeSantis' move to take over Walt Disney World's governing board in Florida may have backfired due to a prior obscure agreement that new governor-appointed board members say stripped them of their power.

Lovie777
(18,420 posts)besides a great many jobs for the sane.
Phoenix61
(18,346 posts)Its strictly about controlling the land and the services, fire, water etc, that entails.
Actually, the board would have most certainly used it's position and power to pressure Disney into changing content, etc, at the risk of having anything and everything it wanted in relation to the land use, services and such withheld unless Disney complied. I think that was the whole point of Deathsantis putting in his cronies, to apply pressure that way to get what he wants. Glad to see the Mouse gave him the royal finger.
hunter
(39,491 posts)It's the Republicans who want to turn everything, even mundane things like keeping community infrastructure in good repair, into a freak show and circus from hell.
lapfog_1
(30,863 posts)or Ron "botas blancas" DeSantis.
Farmer-Rick
(11,745 posts)Love it
Quanto Magnus
(1,120 posts)to wade through his own shit in this pic....
Cha
(310,644 posts)
Where the hell did he find those boots & WTH was he thinking by wearing them?!!

SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 30, 2023, 10:45 AM - Edit history (1)
What about this agreement stops the new board from amending to their advantage? Love his white go-go boots.
Phoenix61
(18,346 posts)They are free to try ask Disney to change the contract but that isnt going to happen. Its the same reason DeStupid couldnt dissolve the board without the state assuming Disneys debt, because thats what the original contract stated.
Agreement may be a better word but either way its legally binding.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)that is binding for decades unless Disney itself agrees to change it. The new board doesn't have the power to change it without Disney's permission.
Disney included a complicated common law provision in the agreement that prevents the new board from having any control over Disney until 21 years after the last surviving descendant of King Charles III passes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_against_perpetuities#:~:text=The%20rule%20against%20perpetuities%20is,time%20the%20instrument%20was%20written.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)Repugs don't seem to care about law or precedent. I can see them nullifying it, unless they see it would be more to their benefit to leave it alone.
Farmer-Rick
(11,745 posts)But the Florida Supreme Court may stop the legislation as an ex post facto law.
Most all ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws).
So Disney would probably win in the Supreme Court, state and even federal.
Old Crank
(5,664 posts)The use of any Disney "fanciful characters". Not the other agreements.
That would mean the board can't depict any Disney character on, letterhead, official documents or announcements.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)from doing anything with the Reedy Creek district except maintaining roads and infrastructure. They can't actually change anything tied to Disney itself in the parks.
Volaris
(10,855 posts)I'd be willing to bet this is just the warning shot. Disney will make sure that President Puddin, never happens.
lark
(24,995 posts)Hope this is true!!!
MayReasonRule
(3,336 posts)


Phoenix61
(18,346 posts)Id love to know what it is.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Rule against perpetuities
The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the common law that prevents people from using legal instruments to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written.
Rule is contract time max. is that of persons living, plus 21 years.
This clause found a loophole
not sure a court would uphold this
seems to not be in the spirit of the law.
Phoenix61
(18,346 posts)7. TERM; ASSIGNMENT BY WDPR. 7.1. Term. This Declaration shall be deemed effective as of the Effective Date and continue to be effective in perpetuity unless all or certain portions of the provisions of this Declaration are expressly terminated as provided elsewhere herein; provided, however, that if the perpetual term of this Declaration is deemed to violate the "Rule Against Perpetuities," or any similar law or rule, this Declaration shall continue in effect until twenty one (21) years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, King of England living as of the date of this Declaration. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary herein, this Declaration will terminate as of the date that none of WDPR or any of its Affiliates (or their respective successor entities) owns any real property within ten (10) miles of the RCID Properties.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Phoenix61
(18,346 posts) Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary herein, this Declaration will terminate as of the date that none of WDPR or any of its Affiliates (or their respective successor entities) owns any real property within ten (10) miles of the RCID Properties.
Mariana
(15,523 posts)who were living at the time the instrument was written.
MayReasonRule
(3,336 posts)https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/30/disney-ron-desantis-royal-lives-clause.html
This...Declaration shall continue in effect until 21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, King of England, living as of the date of this declaration,the document said. This kind of clause is most often used in the UK, typically when it comes to trusts, and provides a buffer against perpetuities.So, as long as one of those grandchildren makes it 80, this clause would be there for 100 years,explained Robert Lord, senior advisor of tax policy at progressive group Patriotic Millionaires.
ROFLMAO

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/30/disney-ron-desantis-florida-dont-say-gay
https://www.indiewire.com/2023/03/disney-world-ron-desantis-royal-lives-clause-1234824230/
https://wdwnt.com/2023/03/declaration-of-restrictive-covenants-in-effect-until-21-years-after-the-death-of-the-last-surviving-descendant-of-king-charles-iii/
Historic NY
(38,975 posts)also the villains always lose.
swimboy
(7,318 posts)[ . . . ] in setting the expiration terms of the agreement, Disney invoked an obscure property law known as Rule Against Perpetuities, setting the date for "twenty one (21) years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles IIII, King of England living as of the date of this Declaration."
Phoenix61
(18,346 posts)different from another one I had read about this. DeStupid is delusional if he thinks the board had anything to do with the entertainment side of Disney.
MayReasonRule
(3,336 posts)Defacto don't matter dejeure's "The Real Jake" a.k.a. "facts in evidence" don't matter "presumptive optics" are everything.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,973 posts)NickB79
(19,902 posts)A cruel, tiny ant who calls himself Dis Ant Is Da Boss, desperate to show the world he's a big man, who wears white boots and dreams of ruling the world.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Ligyron
(7,939 posts)Genius idea!
onethatcares
(16,819 posts)"a cruel tiny ant who calls himself "Pis Ant" is Da Boss"
No need to thank me............
JanLip
(860 posts)😁
area51
(12,302 posts)
lame54
(37,926 posts)RedSpartan
(1,766 posts)Hilarious
Historic NY
(38,975 posts)Arthur Guinness, founder of Guinness, signed a 9,000 year lease at the St. Jamess Gate Brewery in Dublin for £45 per year back in 1759
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)Up til about 1900 they were probably thinking that was a good deal, now it's like a check sent off to the nephew for his birthday. In 50 more years it'll be pocket change unless GB decides to love the Euro once more.
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,002 posts)Caliman73
(11,767 posts)DeSantis is likely not doing any of this for actual policy effects. He doesn't really seem to care about actual policies. He is doing it for the spectacle of "looking tough". He wants to run for president under the auspices of "I'm the one who actually gets things done" to try to differentiate himself from Trump. Now, scratch the surface and you see that most of what he has proposed has been denied in court. He is pretty stupid policy wise, but again, not about policy... about image. When you ask the "base" what do they like about DeSantis, they will typically say, "he's fighting against the woke mob". When you ask them what he has actually accomplished, they can't tell you. They don't know and likely don't care. Same concept as when they said, "Trump keeps his promises" but couldn't tell you ANY policy that Trump actually instituted that aligned with any campaign promise.
DeSantis, in my opinion, will eventually decide not to run or he will lose the primary. He isn't really as adept a politician as people think. He just has an easily fooled base and a relatively docile and dumb population in Florida (no offense to any Florida Democrats), that put up with him.
It is MUCH harder to be a Democratic politician because while we can still "fanboy" at times, we actually expect our people to do what they say they will. We remember what our representatives said and we hold them accountable. Spectacle is not good enough for us. We want actual policy that will make our lives better.
Zorro
(17,388 posts)you better not miss.
Volaris
(10,855 posts)FSogol
(47,344 posts)
Hekate
(97,586 posts)












Upthevibe
(9,506 posts)Skittles
(164,097 posts)that's because he doesn't plan, he PERFORMS, and strictly for the disgusting MAGAt cult
he comes off as a what he is, a bully, a serious ASS CLOWN, to anyone with critical thinking skills
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)Sad so sad.