General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLesley Stahl's 60 Minutes interview with MTG: A spectacular failure
Last edited Mon Apr 3, 2023, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)
on the part those who leaped to judgement--without even have seen the report--and claimed without evidence that CBS was normalizing fascism.
Rather, this was a devastating take-down. Brutal.
Well done Lesley Stahl! Well done 60 Minutes! Well done CBS!
Meanwhile the silence from those who got it spectacularly wrong is deafening.
If you feel inclined to offer up mea culpas, consider this your platform.
ETA: At the suggestion of Brother Buzz (who found this link and has my gratitude for doing so) here is the segment on YouTube:
AbnerBunny
(1,451 posts)I thought mtg was awful-ignorant-arrogant-and Stahl did a fair job bringing that out 🤷🏼?♀️
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Stahl had Greene calling herself crazy while she launched attacks on Republicans.
The whole thing was beautiful.
Hopefully it ends up on YouTube.
Greene came off very badly. Just as I expected.
ShazzieB
(16,370 posts)It was much better than I dared hope.
People who like her won't like her any less, and some of them are probably posting on RW social media right now to complain that Stahl was "mean to her." People like us who already knew she was full of crap still know she's full of crap. This didn't change a thing for either group.
But people who don't know much about her were given some things to think about. Whether they do or not is up to them, of course, but if they don't, it's on them, not on Lesley Stahl.
This wasn't the most hard-hitting interview of all time, but it was no puff piece, either.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)And it was funny how she spent more time attacking Republicans than Democrats--although she did try to smear us as "pedophiles," which was pretty hysterical IMO.
Definitely not a puff piece. Definitely not an embrace of fascism.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-praises-lesley-stahl-60-minutes-amid-backlash-1792008
Yes, it was a puff piece. "Embrace" of fascism? No, just dismissing it as harmless, but an interesting career move for Greene.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)"In just two years, Greene, at age 48, has moved from the fringe of the party to the front row - without changing either her style or her views. "
"This is fueling her clout in the Republican Party, as is her record as a top fundraiser and a close adviser to Kevin McCarthy.
After MTG helped him win the speakership, he rewarded her with positions on two powerful committees: House Oversight that's investigating the Biden family business dealings, and Homeland Security.
Now, what she thinks about the issues matters - like preventing the government from going into default by raising the debt ceiling. "
"Her net worth is estimated at $11 million. But she says, when she was a child, her parents struggled financially trying to start their construction company. She told us that her dad, an arch-conservative, listened to right-wing talk radio all day long.
Marjorie Taylor Greene: And naturally, me being with my parents a lot, I, I listened, as well.
Lesley Stahl: Your dad knew you as a politician. What did he think of your style, your pitbullness?
Marjorie Taylor Greene: He was very proud of me."
"She worked for the family construction business, that she and her then-husband bought from her dad and grew into a lucrative enterprise. "
"Lesley Stahl: What are you up to now?
Marjorie Taylor Greene: This is 205.
Lesley Stahl: Oh my God. " (video of her lifting weights)
"Greene didn't discover her brazen gutsiness, she says, till after 2011 when she got hooked on CrossFit workouts. She got into the extreme exercising with a passion, ending up in competitions, gaining self-confidence. She opened her own gym with a business partner. But, at age 43, she sold her stake and turned to politics in 2019. "
"Most of her constituents in her conservative, largely white, working-class district agree with her on the issues, and especially like the way she fights for her beliefs.
Woman: I'm a New York transplant to Georgia and I just love you.
Marjorie Taylor Greene: Well welcome to freedom! Nice to meet you."
"As a fervent supporter of the now-indicted Donald Trump, she was a featured speaker at his rally in Waco last weekend. While she's adored here, the latest national poll has her approval rating at just 29%.
Donald Trump (at Waco rally): Marjorie Taylor Greene, you happened to be here. Would you like to run for the Senate? I will fight like hell for you, I'll tell ya.
The question for her, and the country, is can she expand her brash MTG brand beyond the right wing, populist base? "
betsuni
(25,472 posts)known to be smart and fearless and have a history of believing in conspiracy theories."
The interviewer never said she thought MTG was smart and fearless in politics.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)if that was in politics as well as generally? Do you think that the average viewer thinks "sure, 60 Minutes says she's "known to be smart and fearless", but what if that doesn't apply in politics, just outside it?"?
I think you can see it was a puff piece, can't you?
betsuni
(25,472 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)Leaving out part of the quote in your claim isn't the VERY thing you are complaining about? You altered a quote to fit YOUR opinion.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)The point being that we all here agree that she is a dangerous fascist. It's your opinion too. Why worry when someone else expresses it?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)covered in lesson 1 of "How to be a Deceitful Republican Politician for Dummies:" TELL people what to think so they'll think it. NEVER admit you're not a winner.
Maybe re-read Shazzie and Just a Box's take. Imo also, shining this national spotlight on her was not good for the GOP.
Btw, uncritically repeating what Greene says would be spreading her "puff." THEY didn't.
(Fwiw, I think we all agree she's a dangerous fascist. For how long she'll remain dangerous is open, though.)
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)and they're worthless.
ShazzieB says "But people who don't know much about her were given some things to think about. Whether they do or not is up to them, of course, but if they don't, it's on them, not on Lesley Stahl."
I disagree; it is on Stahl. She presented Greene as "good and bad" - and that is an appalling conclusion to come to about Greene. It helps her stay dangerous.
MayReasonRule
(1,460 posts)Skid-marks in underwear have greater value than MTG.
May she be hoisted by her own petards.
wnylib
(21,433 posts)It is on YouTube. I would not call Stahl's handling of the interview "brutal." She did give some pushback, especially on Ukraine, but the interview also gave MTG a platform for her slogan that Ukraine is not the 51st state.
When they were on the topic of MTG calling school shootings fake, Stahl let a good opportunity pass. She could have played MTG's harrassment of David Hogg.
A brutal interview would have included questions about Greene asking for a pardon regarding J6. It would have shown the harassment of Hogg to Greene, face to face, in response to MTG's insistence that she takes school shootings seriously. A good follow up question would have been to ask where Greene stands on gun legislation.
Stahl did expose Greene's arrogance, but for many people, that will be seen as confidence.
I can see why Greene had praise for the interview after it ended. It felt good to her at the time. I'm sure she believed that she had asserted herself positively with Stahl. But wouldn't that have been before Stahl's team added the videos and voiceovers that contradicted some of Greene's lies?
Overall, not as bad as claimed, by some people, but not brutal, either, IMO.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)One DUer (and sorry my memory-lapse presets me from giving the credit they deserve) expressed that the key question Stahl should pose was something like, "if you are innocent of wrongdoing, why did you ask for a pardon from Donald Trump?" That would have been a great question.
I only wish the exchange with Greene had filled the whole hour. That would have allowed for even more exposure to the breath of MTG's nuttery.
wnylib
(21,433 posts)I'd bet that she would walk out in a huff before it was over.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I'm sure he'd be accused of "enabling fascism" and criticised for "platforming" Greene, but...
emulatorloo
(44,117 posts)Not everybody out there is a political junkie like we are.
It sounds like viewers got an earful of her CRAZY.
I havent seen it yet, but I like Leslie Stahls interviewing technique.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)She torched MTG.
cilla4progress
(24,726 posts)Thank you for your perspective.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Very satisfying.
SouthBayDem
(32,018 posts)when Traitor Queene equated support for transgender children to child sexual abuse. The Jon Stewart interview with the Arkansas attorney general showed how to refute such garbage:
To her credit, Stahl did come prepared with the usual examples of Traitor being a jerk such as the video of heckling David Hogg and liking the facebook comment about killing Pelosi. Getting Traitor to admit she wasnt in control of her facebook page was unintentionally more funny than the average modern CBS comedy show.
Bluethroughu
(5,153 posts)By the way, it's not a Supreme Court arguement, only facts and logic.
RockRaven
(14,959 posts)There may be fewer potential mea culpas than you anticipate.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Pretty much hearing ***crickets***
That's how you know just how wrong some people were jumping to extreme conclusions w/o even seeing the show.
RockRaven
(14,959 posts)anticipatory judgments being wrong? For that to be true, the mea culpa silence would have to be out of embarrassment at having been wrong. But couldn't their mea culpa silence also be from having their opinion vindicated, i.e. no backtracking is warranted in their opinion?
Do you discount the possibility that other people could watch the same video and come to a different conclusion than you? That doesn't fit with my experience at all, it is extremely common.
(FWIW, I have no dog in this one. I didn't say anything prior to the show)
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)puff piece or one that normalized fascism.
And it clearly was neither of those things.
I don't think anyone who watched would argue otherwise. Hence the crickets.
RockRaven
(14,959 posts)and the only difference between the two is your apparent certainty that no honest/reasonable/whatever person could watch the same video and have a different opinion of it. That doesn't match my life experience at all. I find that surprising and mildly confusing.
But I'm glad you enjoyed it, in any case. At least somebody did.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)normalized fascism.
100% correct.
brush
(53,767 posts)seem just another legitimate side of the coin of public discourse.
Not good.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)It was a beautiful take-down of a dangerous lunatic.
brush
(53,767 posts)to get her crazed ideas out to the national stage.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Greene's crazy ideas will be seen by the 60 Minutes audience as the cray-cray that they are.
Honestly think her crazed idea's aren't already out there? All this teeth clenching "Stahl Normalized Green" nonsense is just that. So what you are saying is the US population only needs an interview on 60 minutes to "Normalize lunacy?" And newsflash, if you think her crazed ideas aren't already on the national stage, and have been for quite some time (hint, it didn't just start 6 years ago) you haven't been paying attention.
brush
(53,767 posts)Rolling one's eyes dosn't cut it.
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)LOONY MTG is. I'm flabbergasted that people actually believe her crap!
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Doing the complete job would require a mini-series, but this was a nice start.
I wonder if MTG throws catsup bottles?
KPN
(15,642 posts)UTUSN
(70,683 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)That's how to do it.
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)UTUSN
(70,683 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,416 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,416 posts)Just an idea
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I added your link.
Thanks again!!!
oasis
(49,376 posts)PatrickforB
(14,570 posts)1. Dangerous
2. Dirt
3. Bag
Silent Type
(2,895 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)MTG got exactly what she wanted- a nationally recognized platform to spew her shit which shes now going to use to further her grievance campaign.
Shes going to fundraise like crazy of this and CBS facilitated this bullshit.
Shame on them. Lesley Stahl is permanently stained.
I stand by my opinion 100% that this interview is a blow to our democracy
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)rude.
In this age where coarse language reigns supreme you would have to classify it as "whimsically disdainful".
yowzayowzayowza
(7,017 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)But funny how this poster ignores thoughtful dissenting opinions or even worse laughs at them.
That said, the OP itself is a joke, so I guess laughter is his thing..
Pretty unbelievable thread here.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)and she spells it Lesley because she's so special and so good at eyerolls.
CBS singlehandedly created MTG and convinced the entire US population that MTG is just a poor misunderstood Fearless smart woman!
Archae
(46,318 posts)People who can BEST be described as scum of the Earth will get interviewed.
Charles Manson
Jeffrey Dahmer
Tim McVeigh
And so on.
It reminds me of the old "freak shows," taking the scumbags out, crass cheap ways of getting ratings.
brush
(53,767 posts)the stupid national red state/blue state divorce foolishness. Also that Democrats are pedophiles. Stahl just said "ok" and moved on.
WTF?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)brush
(53,767 posts)Ya don't let a statement that Democrats are pedophiles go by with an eye roll. That vile woman is dangerous to the nation, on important House committes now, and should not have been given a national platform, then just kinda pushed back a bit on some issues.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Greene is as dangerous as you say. It is vital that such people are exposed.
Stahl deserves kudos.
brush
(53,767 posts)Now it's out there on the airwaves...her word against Greene's.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)of her extremist comments. That was a good use of the time in my estimation.
brush
(53,767 posts)a more tougher push back style like Jim Acosta of Jen Psaki. Of course they're not on "60 Minutes" staff.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)No, really.
brush
(53,767 posts)against trump's several press secretaries. He even got banned from them for his tough questions.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)That Lesley sure is one "brave reporter" NOT.. By the way, it's spelled L-E-S-L-E-Y since you love her so much I would think you would want to know how her name is actually spelled. There ya go!
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)No one is going to remember anything except her saying that democrats are pedophiles sexualizing our kids.
She played Stalh and sixty minutes using alt right playbook 101:
Control the narrative
https://m.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)then she succeeded brilliantly.
Stahl exposed her insanity.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)All she cares about is looking uncompromising and getting her talking point out.
She won.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Greene was exposed as a loon.
This was a very bad night for her. She must be fuming.
Hide the catsup.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)But this is why the alt right keeps winning.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)And exposing their bullshit to the light is critical to beating them back.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)Ill tell that to everyone upset about loosing their right to choose and autonomy.
Ill remember that as they strip me of my ability to transition or use the freaking bathroom later on, remove trans kids from their parents, throw drag queens in prison, undo same sex marriage, ban even talking about LGBTQ issues, rob us of our Miranda rights, and now are taking aim at right to council.
This doesnt look like fucking winning to me
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Leslie Stahl did the nation a service.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)The only thing that anyone will remember is that she called democrats pedophiles who are sexualizing our kids.
Exactly what MTG wanted.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)With a huge eye-roll of disgust.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)MTG's "message" is not a new one. Not even close to new. It has been out there for a very long time. Waaaaaaay before MTG took it up or anyone knew she even existed. Are you just now noticing? The time to to have taken said message seriously was when republicans were screaming from the rooftops exactly what their plans were for the past 4 decades! The barn doors are open and the horses have bolted. MTG on 60 minutes, is the very least of our problems.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)And they have a decent shot of winning in 2024.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
I'm questioning what your actual motivation is here, because you're blatantly wrong on this topic.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Anyone who watches can see the truth for themselves.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I disagree entirely.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)"peddling right wing talking points." LOL
Marius25
(3,213 posts)She was completely normalized. Stahl barely pushed back, and showed clips of her behaving normal.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)as have most people on social media. So I'm not sure what world you're living in where you actually think that actually hurt Greene.
And since I'm tired of you defending these right-wing networks normalizing fascism, it's time to block you.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I live in the real word. Thanks anyway.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)Try again
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)Weren't you the one posting just last week all the gloom and doom about there would never be any indictments? Yes, yes you were. I see you've moved on to something else to be wrong about. Carry on.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)He won big last time.
What has changed in your opinion?
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Giving that thing airtime, making that thing relevant only helps the rw nuts no matter how stupid it sounded.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)and demand she start proving it. It sounds like Stahl just let her get away with it.
You know, preserving access to Greene's kennel.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)When I watched the video I wasn't as confident as you are.
Reminded of Marshall McLuhan's the "Medium is the Message" I find simply having her on walking around the Capital and showing humanizing shots of her in normal, even admirable shots, like her gym training on a national prestige show does in fact normalize her.
Also I felt that Stahl didn't press the question well. For example on the question of equating Democrats as pedophiles she could have asked, "if your followers equate Democrats as pedophiles do you think they are more or less likely to commit acts of violence against them?"
On the questions re Q Anon on her Twitter feed she excused them as staff actions she should have asked, "regardless of who put it there do you agree with the statement, yes or no?"
Also they showed her constituents as being enthusiastic supporters, they should have showed some who think she is crazy as a loon.
I am so angered by her I can't be objective, maybe you are correct. I would give them a B- at best.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)on to other outrages.
Either way, an interviewer is open to criticism.
I think Leslie Stahl struck the right balance. I wish she had the full hour.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)1) it showed people back home like her, apparently all her constituents support her including a transplant from NY. CBS was unable to find a single constituent that found her extreme
2) They showed her doing lots of normal things like walking around the Capital and exercising in a weight room.
3) And yes it included a few tastes of radical nuttery but she walked away from most of it unscathed. She also got on the record that she included Trump on the general charge of fiscal irresponsibility so she doesn't appear as the Trump sycophant she is.
McCarthy by that contrast is the reasonable moderate who is building a consensus rather than a weak extreme RW leader who has capitulated to even more extreme RW nutjobs.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)She blasted the Republican Party for the debt.
Not sure that helps Kevin McCarthy.
Mitch McConnell--who was name-checked--can't be pleased.
you are assuming you know how McCarthy feels about an interview?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)This is a discussion board where people offer opinions based on observations and past actions.
Cha
(297,154 posts)barbtries
(28,787 posts)i got 2 minutes and 33 seconds in. i hope it was a takedown, but i just can't take her.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)The fact that she was given any airtime normalizes her, I don't care whether you think it wasn't flattering or not.
Lesley Stahl and 60 minutes are still garbage for doing it. We didn't get it wrong, you did.
Her being given air time was what she wanted.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)To call this segment "not flattering" to MTG is the understatement of all time.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)That's a fact.
Greene doesn't care if it's flattering. Her being given primetime coverage is what she wanted. She's no longer a Fox/Newsmax moron mouthpiece. There are plenty of people who will watch that and think she's not as crazy as they thought, thereby normalizing her.
Response to Marius25 (Reply #65)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
JI7
(89,247 posts)girls getting undressed ?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)MTG's insanity knows no bounds. 13 minutes isn't enough time for a fraction of her kookery to be exposed.
But Stahl did a good job within the time constraints.
Abolishinist
(1,293 posts)would you have included her working out at the gym? Seems rather trite, perhaps they could have watched her preparing breakfast as well?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)yardwork
(61,596 posts)I don't think you understand what is meant by "normalize." This weak interview showcased a literal Nazi as if she were an ordinary old-fashioned Republican with "strong opinions" who "speaks her mind."
This is exactly what the media did with Trump and here we are.
This was an info-tainmentpiece, not journalism.
JI7
(89,247 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Informing the American public about the threat posed by Greene is vital.
orangecrush
(19,537 posts)Abolishinist
(1,293 posts)Brutal would have been actually taking her to task for some of her more egregious past comments and stances, putting her on the spot to explain them in no uncertain terms. For the most part, that didn't happen. Rolling one's eyes is hardly a take-down.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)The roll-eye (which was a thing of beauty) was hardly the only push-back that Greene got from Leslie Stahl.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Real hard-nosed journalism there. I can see why you are so impressed.
YOU DONT PUT THE FRINGE IN THE FRONT ROW. You dont let them scream that Democrats are pedophiles, even if you have a first class eye roll all lined up.
Stupidest shit ever. No one here should be defending it.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)The fringe is already in the front row. It is best combat extremism by shining a light on it.
I applaud Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for a job well-done!
We could use more of the same to help take down the populist extremists who threaten our democracy.
Abolishinist
(1,293 posts)Could you provide a list some of the "populisit extremists who threaten our democracy" who you would like to see Lesley Stahl interview?
burrowowl
(17,639 posts)NJCher
(35,658 posts)Thank you for venturing forth, spending your time, and letting the rest of us know about it.
No mea culpas here because I figured if it was worth watching, I could catch it on my automatic DVR for that show. However, I doubt if I'll watch it, even if Stahl did a good job of showing her to be the wack job she is.
The woman is of no interest to me and I have other priorities for my time.
senegal1
(535 posts)Gave a national platform to MTG and barely had enough research segments to refute her bulls*t. Weak rolling of the interviewers eyes at the LBGT hate speech and use of denigrating terms for dems did nothing but normalize acceptance of such comments into national news. Bad on 60 mins. I didnt learn anything I didnt know already and folks who believe in her just saw her status go up a notch.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)Are people hard of watching? Lost the ability to judge interviews? Expect slapping and yelling or it's a puff piece? Form prejudgements in concrete without first hand knowledge and stick with it no matter what? Why? We supposed to hate Teh Establishment Media? Always assume the worst and assume bad intentions? Normalizing what? I don't understand the outrage. Does everyone have to be outraged all the time now?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Very refreshing to read.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)Emotion over thinking, no research to find out facts, close ears and eyes and become outraged at imagined things. Conspiracy theory nation.
Suddenly "Sunlight is the best disinfectant," holding feet to the fire, exposure, etc. disappeared. Discussing anything bad is "promoting it."
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)If so, then you weren't paying attention in 2016.
It's not "bad intentions" we're accusing Stahl of, it's rank incompetency. No, we don't expect her to be "outraged", we expect her to hold Greene to task for her antisemitism, her links to neo-Nazis, and to do something more than rolling her eyes.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)I can ask to read it again. But you knew you could do that without me suggesting it, if you didn't understand it the first time. So why bother replying like that? You haven't bothered replying to anything in it, and you haven't said anything new.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)Don't build up a reputation as one of those. Better, listen to a few Democrats and what they've said about the interview, rather than trying to defend it here.
If the American public bases their voting decisions on a 60 minutes interview our problems are WAY bigger than what MTG has to say.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Thats what we need. Lets feed the Congressional Attention Whore some more.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)who are an ever-present threat to our values and to our republic.
So, my answer is: Yes! It is necessary.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Kevin better watch his ass
With her around, hes not safe.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)She managed to alienate a number of other (loathsome) Republicans, like McConnell, Graham, and Romney and even Trump, who she blamed for the deficit. That won't win her friends in her own party.
She is very creepy and clearly ambitious (in the worst possible meaning of the term).
I think it was important that the American people, on widely watched program (by today's standards) do to see what's she's all about. MTG is repugnant. Ignoring her won't make her go away.
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)That interview simply gave Marge a platform to spew her already well-known hate, and to rile up her base on a national level two days prior to Trump's indictment.
CBS did this country no favors by airing this half-assed interview.
The average DUer would have been able do a better job rebutting Marge.
You're hailing Stahl as some kind of savior for "shredding" or "exposing" Marge.
Stahl was over-complimentary, and under-critical.
Marge is in everyone's face 24/7. CBS and Leslie Stahl had nothing to do with "helping the American people see what Marge is all about".
calimary
(81,220 posts)Ignoring her won't make her go away.
Raine
(30,540 posts)betsuni
(25,472 posts)Aussie105
(5,383 posts)was the wrong thing to do.
Who decided that the interview needed doing? And why?
edhopper
(33,573 posts)Stahl and 60 minutes has allowed MTG to become stronger with the GOP base. And have more influence in Congress.
Looking at this interview through the eyes of Liberal Democrats will not show it's effects.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)That interview was exactly what we expected. Your attempt at a trolling victory lap is just rather sad.
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Even when we post comment after comment by prominent figures of how horrible Stahl did - OP keeps saying they're all wrong, Stahl is amazing. Stahl literally called a Nazi "smart and fearless." That doesn't show Greene as being a crazy Nazi.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Thats probably the most effective way to deal with a troll.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)to the light of "gaslighting" doesn't seem in keeping with the core principles of this forum.
We have a broad coalition and reasonable people can reach different conclusions over how to deal with the threats posed by people like MTG. Name calling is unnecessary.
Response to Just A Box Of Rain (Reply #150)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
Celerity
(43,328 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Truth Social?
Surely you will.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)of being trolls.
Conjuay
(1,384 posts)A real investigator would have done some research and would have the number of repugnantcan leaders who have actually been tried for pedophilia V the number of Dems tried for it.
She should have had challenged who is doing the grooming, who is trying to force us to live in their shitty dreamscape.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)If for no other reason than a bunch of posters here I cant stand are so pressed about it.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)I suspect you will enjoy it, and join me in regretting it wasn't much longer.
Only so much one can get into a segment of that length, but Stahl did admirably in my estimation.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)However, I'd suggest going to 5:20 on the video linked in the OP and listening for oneself.
Stahl frames Greene's charge as over the top and then Stahl called Green out:
"They [Democrats] are not pedophiles. Why would you say that?!"
The Wow! moment (that came with the beautiful eye-roll) perfectly expressed just how flabbergasted a well-respected and well-seasoned journalist was with Greene's brazen lying.
The 60 Minutes audience understood that.
aocommunalpunch
(4,236 posts)You know, to keep everyone informed over how cray cray she is? Bring on the interviews! They could show an empty seat while they're waiting. This approach of giving airtime to fascists should have mild results, I imagine.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Let's examine some of the things Lesley Stahl had to say in the interview and a few word that MTG expressed as well. Shall we?
Here are some from Stahl:
Known for her sharp tongue and radical views
has a history of believing in conspiracy theories
Words that have been said about you: crazy, Q clown, looney tune, unhinged, moron, pretty ugly stuff
People say you are Trump in high heel,..many consider MTGs behavior outlandish, even thuggish
Thats glib, thats glib, what does that mean?
Greene complains about the news media for harping on things she did in the past, likeas in this video [rolls tape] chasing after the survivor of the Parkland FL school shooting [then showing the evidence of Greene berating a shooting survivor]
And things shes says that are over-the top, like the Democrats are the part of pedophiles"
They are NOT pedophiles! What would you day that?!
Wow! [roll-eyes]...
Shortly after she arrived in Washington the Democratic-led House outside her from her committees because of her past endorsement of violence against some Democrats and her embrace of Q-Anon [rolls tape as evidence]
Did you ever apologize to Nancy Pelosi for the bullet to her head? [displays a liked Facebook post calling for Pelosi to be shot]
Did you apologize for your position on Parkland Florida [shows support for Facebook calling the shootings a false flag attack as Greene denies it]
Here are some of the things youve said: That America should have a Christian government, that abortion should be banned nationally, that you want to defend the FBI? You want immigration to stop, you want 4 years, youve said those things, correct? MTG agrees]
The Constitution, the very first amendment, prohibits having a religion in government
The latest nation poll shows her approval rating at just 29%.
And here are some words for Marjorie Taylor Greene's own mouth:
Margorie is crazy. Margorie is extreme. Margorie is a right-wing extremist
They call me racist. They call me anti Semitic
What made me run for Congress when [sic] I saw the Republicans in Congress, the House and the Senate, completely fail to deliver the agenda that we had all voted for
They failed us.. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, yea, those types, Mitt Romney, Im not even sure why he calls himself a Republican.
***
Not exactly an endorsement of Republican fascism. LOL
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)extremist violence or embrace fascism.
I was a little nervous reading all the reviews written by people before they even saw the segment.
What a relief!
I'm a big fan of liberal democracy and the Democratic Party, myself.
Grateful to Lesley Stahl for this piece. Important work!
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)Do you agree with that statement?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Stahls comments were related to Green'e business dealings as a reportedly successful owner of a construction business. I can't judge her business savvy.
Politically, Greene is looney, which is another descriptor used with Greene, along with "Crazy, Q Clown, Unhinged, and Moron."
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)Do you think that statement cast MTG in a favorable light, or a neutral light??
How about the scene that was shown with MTG shaking hands with her constituents, including a woman from New York who was very fond of MTG? Do you think that had the effect of normalizing MTG?
Also, MTG "seems" like a moron to you? Do I have that correct?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Very bad. Stahl revealed Greene's dishonesty and her populist extremism in a very effective fashion.
The piece painted Green in a very-highly unfavorable light.
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)answer the questions that I asked in my response to you?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)I'm having trouble finding an answer to each of them. Or any of them.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Unfortunately Greene has considerable support in her district (which is unfathomable to me).
If memory serves Greene first won her seat with nearly three-quarters of the vote, and by an almost 50 point margin.
That's a shame on her district, which seeminging isn't "normal" to me, but Stahl merely reported the truth of the matter on that point--which is the way good journalists act.
It isn't good journalism to ignore inconvenient truths no matter how incomprehensible it is that people in her district made such appalling bad choices.
As to Greene being a "moron," that seem like the case to me. Do I have the results of cognitive testing to prove the case? I don't. So I need to opperate from my best judgement.
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)Ms. Stahl rolled her eyes slightly and whispered "wow" and then moved on. Did Ms. Stahl then state that gender identity hasn't a thing to do with sexualizing children, or pedophilia?
Ms. Stahl stated that CBS fact checked MTG's comments about Parkland. MTG then went off on a non-sensical rant asking if they fact checked all of her statements through 12th grade, etc. Ms. Stahl did not follow-up on this nonsense in order to nail down MTG's exact position on Parkland. Ms. Stahl's original question was whether or not MTG apologized for her position on Parkland. She never got an answer to her question, and the only thing MTG ended up saying about her position on Parkland is that "it's nothing to joke about", which tells the viewer nothing about why MTG made her previous comments about Parkland, as well as not answering why MTG chased David Hogg down the street, badgering him.
Do you think the above two examples represent "good journalism" that provides the viewer with truthful and useful information?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Clearly and directly.
LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,130 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)60 Minutes piece. Highly recommended: