HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » "New documents show how S...

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:33 AM

"New documents show how Sandra Day O'Connor helped George W. Bush win the 2000 election"



CNN

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor provided the early framework that steered the outcome in the dispute over the 2000 presidential election and ensured George W. Bush would win the White House over Al Gore, Supreme Court documents released on Tuesday show.

Memos found in the newly opened files of the late Justice John Paul Stevens offer a first-ever view of the behind-the-scenes negotiations on Bush v. Gore at the court. They also demonstrate the tension among the nine justices being asked to decide a presidential election on short deadlines.

The documents opened at the Library of Congress help reveal how the now-retired O’Connor, the first woman on the high court and a justice steeped in politics from her early days in the Arizona legislature, partnered with Justice Anthony Kennedy, effectively squeezing out an argument advanced by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

The strong hand of O’Connor, who was at the ideological center of the court in this era, is not wholly surprising. O’Connor was also known for trying to get out ahead of deliberations, and her four-page memo was circulated to colleagues even before oral arguments. Her move may have guaranteed that she and Kennedy had the greatest influence on the final “per curiam” opinion that spoke for a five-justice majority.

That final 5-4 Bush v. Gore decision stopped county recounts for Florida’s decisive presidential electors and gave then-Texas Gov. Bush the victory over then-Vice President Gore.

The five conservative justices (O’Connor, Kennedy, Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas) sided with Bush. The four liberal justices (Stevens, with David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer) aligned with Gore and dissented angrily.


https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/02/politics/bush-gore-oconnor-supreme-court-2000/index.html

20 replies, 2768 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
Reply "New documents show how Sandra Day O'Connor helped George W. Bush win the 2000 election" (Original post)
GPV May 2023 OP
Boomerproud May 2023 #1
GPV May 2023 #3
Buns_of_Fire May 2023 #2
GPV May 2023 #4
jaxexpat May 2023 #9
moniss May 2023 #7
agingdem May 2023 #8
jaxexpat May 2023 #10
chia May 2023 #13
LisaM May 2023 #5
GPV May 2023 #6
bedazzled May 2023 #11
Roy Rolling May 2023 #12
NNadir May 2023 #14
Mr. Sparkle May 2023 #15
GreenWave May 2023 #16
mopinko May 2023 #19
uponit7771 May 2023 #20
JHB May 2023 #17
mopinko May 2023 #18

Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:43 AM

1. This confirms what I've been told and believed for 23 years.

If I didn't have to control my emotions I would be very angry right now but I have to walk into work like I know nothing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Boomerproud (Reply #1)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:47 AM

3. I've got a couple hours to cool down. The only silver lining from that fateful decision was we

got DU out of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:46 AM

2. IIRC, they also took pains to state that their decision

was NOT to be used as a precedent. Not that the current court is all that concerned with precedents in the first place (unless Alito has something from Hammurabi's Code that he wants to toss in).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #2)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:49 AM

4. The current court??? Ppphhhhbbbttttt! Most of them care only about the green.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Reply #4)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:11 AM

9. The crew of six. They've overdosed on hubris and Alito.

Blinded by Thomas' insufferable excesses, they've lost sight to the extent they can't even see how "green laden" they too have become. Their intellectual acumen withdrawn in fear of exposure, their autonomic functions dominate, all solely focused on placating the worst nature of the worst of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #2)

Wed May 3, 2023, 05:29 AM

7. You are correct

and they have used it for precedent ever since. They shouldn't have taken the case to begin with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #2)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:03 AM

8. Trump knew months before the 2020 election he was going to lose...

his callous disregard for human life: his monstrously botched pandemic response, 300,000 covid deaths..and Trump chaos fatigue....so he and his enablers set about "fixing" the election..Bill Barr was publicly questioning the validity of voting by mail, Louis DeJoy was slowing the mail, removing mailboxes and trashing mail sorting apparatus, and Trump was "warning" his rally goers the only way he could lose is if Biden rigged the election..Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, and Rudy Giuliani knew early election night results would temporarily favor Trump and they told him to to declare victory and demand the vote count stop, confident a Biden challenge would go to the Trump's Supreme Court...and because of Bush v Gore, the Court would throw the election to Trump...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to agingdem (Reply #8)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:15 AM

10. I think you have it in a nutshell, there, agingdem.

Stupidly simple, really, it's embarrassing for those susceptible to humiliation. Unfortunately, so few of them are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to agingdem (Reply #8)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:32 AM

13. +1,000,000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:52 AM

5. Every SCOTUS disaster since has stemmed from that decision.

That includes outcomes that led directly to Trump's election (dismantling the VRA and Citizens United).

Sandra Day O'Connor was seen the night of the election saying that a potential Gore victory would be "terrible", because she wanted to retire. She was one of at least three conservative judges who should have recused themselves because of conflicts of interest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaM (Reply #5)

Wed May 3, 2023, 04:53 AM

6. It takes integrity to recuse oneself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:19 AM

11. Had to sit through a video she did about the wonders of American Justice

When I did jury duty in Palm Beach County a few years ago. Made me want to hurl. She should rot in hell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:29 AM

12. The Brooks Brothers Riots

Look it up. Fake protests, paid Republican employee protestors, fake news.

Republicans are a propaganda party disguised as a legitimate representative of their constituents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:39 AM

14. And that began the process of delegitimizing the court, putting thugs like Grand Inquisitor Alito...

...in place, resulting in the defacto rejection of the Constitutional prohibition of a State religion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:40 AM

15. A little unnoticed side effect of this decision, it allowed the conservative justices to maintain

the majority on the court, for at least the next 2 decades.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:41 AM

16. What we need to know are the massive voter purges.

They did not just happen in Florida. Were they designed to favor the GOP?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GreenWave (Reply #16)

Wed May 3, 2023, 08:00 AM

19. absolutely. another line of attack gore left on the table.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GreenWave (Reply #16)

Wed May 3, 2023, 09:39 AM

20. THIS !!!! ☝🏾☝🏾☝🏾

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 06:45 AM

17. If you haven't already, you can add "judicial activism" to the list...

... of "every accusation is a confession."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GPV (Original post)

Wed May 3, 2023, 08:00 AM

18. i disagree w this take. she headed off an even worse ruling by rehnquist.

he was ready to go full bore independent state legislator theory. if that had happened, 2020 could have come out differently.
gore’s case was flawed, it was known at the time. his cherry picking of dem counties, instead of asking for a statewide recount was the wedge they needed. and a statewide recount would likely have given it to him.

what she did here was her s.o.p. she was pivotal, and she knew it, and she worked it. this take seems to lay the whole mess on o’connor, and let the boys off the hook.
quelle surprise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread