Seems there is no well regulated militia. So endeth the 2nd

[BSdetect]

[Shermann]

1. Need to stop calling it "gun control" and call it "militia regulation" nt

[MarineCombatEngineer]

2. Courts disagree,

so, there's that.

[AndyS]

4. If this court is your friend you need to seriously evaluate your lifestyle . . .

[MarineCombatEngineer]

5. Wow!!!

You got that from my innocuous post?

Kindly quit putting your words in my mouth, I have no idea where they've been.

[AndyS]

6. No, it was just an observation. "You" could be the editorial you.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

7. Fair enough,

but your post came off different to me, so if I'm incorrect, then I apologize.

[FBaggins]

3. Not quite how that works

It clearly says that a well regulated militia is necessary.

So if we argue that there is none… one would need to be created. Or amend the constitution

[ForgedCrank]

9. If people

would simply read the federalists, the intent in there is very clear, and it does not tie gun ownership to any militia membership.

[hack89]

8. Heller changed things a little

Unfortunately it is the law of the land.

[SYFROYH]

10. There is a clear path for realing the second.

Have at it.


https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution