Tue May 9, 2023, 06:52 PM
GPV (72,324 posts)
Update: Anyone check on the Freeps to see if they melted down?Last edited Wed May 10, 2023, 04:02 AM - Edit history (1)
Thank you to the intrepid souls who braved the fever swamp. It seems the reactions were mostly as I expected.
![]()
|
15 replies, 1183 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
GPV | May 2023 | OP |
gay texan | May 2023 | #1 | |
ecstatic | May 2023 | #6 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2023 | #2 | |
ecstatic | May 2023 | #7 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2023 | #9 | |
viva la | May 2023 | #12 | |
yardwork | May 2023 | #13 | |
Tree Lady | May 2023 | #3 | |
Danascot | May 2023 | #4 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2023 | #5 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | May 2023 | #8 | |
highplainsdem | May 2023 | #10 | |
Boomerproud | May 2023 | #11 | |
mitch96 | May 2023 | #14 | |
GPV | May 2023 | #15 |
Response to GPV (Original post)
Tue May 9, 2023, 06:56 PM
gay texan (2,126 posts)
1. No, but I can n/t
Response to gay texan (Reply #1)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:12 PM
ecstatic (31,817 posts)
6. ok, let us know!
I'm already behind on my work. lol
|
Response to GPV (Original post)
Tue May 9, 2023, 06:56 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (46,735 posts)
2. They don't melt. They read their lines from the playbook
with 6 men and 3 women, it is difficult to believe that the jury found
trump liable for anything. how many juror votes were needed for liability? what is “wrong” with the men on the jury? (aha, if this jury is in manhattan, i think the answer is probably evident...) 90 posted on 2023-05-09, by SteveH He’ll appeal and then put on his defense, which he intentionally held back.
9 posted on 2023-05-09, by JonPreston But no to the rape so this is gonna be thrown out on appeal you can’t
be found not liable on rape but liable for sexual abuse it’s the same accusation 5 posted on 2023-05-09, by Sarah Barracuda Insanity
Five million For a kiss on the cheek Good lord Kaplans name goes in the list lol 158 posted on 2023-05-09, by wardaddy (Truth is treason in the Empire of lies) |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #2)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:14 PM
ecstatic (31,817 posts)
7. "Kaplans name goes in the list "
WTF does that mean??? What list?
![]() |
Response to ecstatic (Reply #7)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:17 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (46,735 posts)
9. There are occasional posts on that site about extra-judicial violence and lamp posts and lists
Sometimes attempts are made to excuse it with sincerely made claims that Democrats are aiming to kill them all. |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #2)
Tue May 9, 2023, 08:42 PM
viva la (2,658 posts)
12. "He'll appeal and then put on his defense, which he intentionally held back.'
How stupid are these people?
That's not how appeals work. That's also not how anyone with an actual defense works either. I'm grinning, btw, imagining Melania laying into him tonight. |
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #2)
Tue May 9, 2023, 08:44 PM
yardwork (58,298 posts)
13. Those are hilarious!
He intentionally held back his defense until the appeal?! Why?
![]() |
Response to GPV (Original post)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:03 PM
Tree Lady (11,057 posts)
3. I put my ipad on private browsing
and checked out Oann. Their headline was verdict reached in Carroll case not mentioning what it was, in article downplayed everything.
I read a bunch of comments all what I thought about it being in New York, political, the dems paid for it, all the type of things I thought they would say. They absolutely don't believe it really happened. At least no one was stupid enough to say it was okay even if he did it. |
Response to GPV (Original post)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:06 PM
Danascot (4,515 posts)
4. "Erection deniers"
Response to Danascot (Reply #4)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:12 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (46,735 posts)
5. Brilliant!
Response to Danascot (Reply #4)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:14 PM
Bernardo de La Paz (46,735 posts)
8. bucolic_frolic, actually.
Response to GPV (Original post)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:24 PM
highplainsdem (46,778 posts)
10. No, but I checked Twitter briefly. The RWNJ's brain-dead reactions were
1) insistence that nothing non-consensual could have happened because women supposedly find Trump so desirable, and
2) insistence that if he was not found liable for rape, then Carroll had defamed him and what he'd said about her was justified defense against a false accusation. And there were lots of tweets about the verdict not changing their support of Trump. Not rational reactions. But if they were rational, they wouldn't have supported Trump in the first place. |
Response to highplainsdem (Reply #10)
Tue May 9, 2023, 07:39 PM
Boomerproud (7,416 posts)
11. Sickening.
I fully expected this reaction.
![]() |
Response to highplainsdem (Reply #10)
Tue May 9, 2023, 09:21 PM
mitch96 (12,902 posts)
14. As the saying goes.. Denial is not only a river in Egypt... nt
Response to GPV (Original post)
Wed May 10, 2023, 04:03 AM
GPV (72,324 posts)