Update: Anyone check on the Freeps to see if they melted down?

[GPV]

Last edited Wed May 10, 2023, 04:02 AM - Edit history (1)

Thank you to the intrepid souls who braved the fever swamp. It seems the reactions were mostly as I expected.

[gay texan]

1. No, but I can n/t

[ecstatic]

6. ok, let us know!

I'm already behind on my work. lol

[Bernardo de La Paz]

2. They don't melt. They read their lines from the playbook

with 6 men and 3 women, it is difficult to believe that the jury found
trump liable for anything. how many juror votes were needed for liability?
what is “wrong” with the men on the jury?
(aha, if this jury is in manhattan, i think the answer is probably evident...)
90 posted on 2023-05-09, by SteveH

He’ll appeal and then put on his defense, which he intentionally held back.
9 posted on 2023-05-09, by JonPreston

But no to the rape so this is gonna be thrown out on appeal you can’t
be found not liable on rape but liable for sexual abuse it’s the same
accusation
5 posted on 2023-05-09, by Sarah Barracuda

Insanity
Five million
For a kiss on the cheek
Good lord
Kaplans name goes in the list lol
158 posted on 2023-05-09, by wardaddy (Truth is treason
in the Empire of lies)

[ecstatic]

7. "Kaplans name goes in the list "

WTF does that mean??? What list?

[Bernardo de La Paz]

9. There are occasional posts on that site about extra-judicial violence and lamp posts and lists

Sometimes attempts are made to excuse it with sincerely made claims that Democrats are aiming to kill them all.

[viva la]

12. "He'll appeal and then put on his defense, which he intentionally held back.'

How stupid are these people?

That's not how appeals work.
That's also not how anyone with an actual defense works either.

I'm grinning, btw, imagining Melania laying into him tonight.

[yardwork]

13. Those are hilarious!

He intentionally held back his defense until the appeal?! Why?

[Tree Lady]

3. I put my ipad on private browsing

and checked out Oann. Their headline was verdict reached in Carroll case not mentioning what it was, in article downplayed everything.

I read a bunch of comments all what I thought about it being in New York, political, the dems paid for it, all the type of things I thought they would say.

They absolutely don't believe it really happened. At least no one was stupid enough to say it was okay even if he did it.

[Danascot]

4. "Erection deniers"

courtesy of malaise

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=17898363

[Bernardo de La Paz]

5. Brilliant!

[Bernardo de La Paz]

8. bucolic_frolic, actually.

[highplainsdem]

10. No, but I checked Twitter briefly. The RWNJ's brain-dead reactions were

1) insistence that nothing non-consensual could have happened because women supposedly find Trump so desirable, and

2) insistence that if he was not found liable for rape, then Carroll had defamed him and what he'd said about her was justified defense against a false accusation.

And there were lots of tweets about the verdict not changing their support of Trump.

Not rational reactions. But if they were rational, they wouldn't have supported Trump in the first place.

[Boomerproud]

11. Sickening.

I fully expected this reaction.

[mitch96]

14. As the saying goes.. Denial is not only a river in Egypt... nt

[GPV]

15. Par for the course, then