Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vice-President Obama for 2024? (Original Post) Willis88 Jun 2023 OP
Oh, FFS. It's stupid and it's not going to happen. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #1
+++Agree Diamond_Dog Jun 2023 #23
Variation on the Michael Moore prediction that the only way Democrats would win in 2020 betsuni Jun 2023 #31
Yes, and PJB has already stated that Kamala will remain on the ticket in '24.... DemocraticPatriot Jun 2023 #71
President Biden already has a running mate, & she is abundantly qualified Hekate Jun 2023 #2
Agreed. I don't want her replaced. Willis88 Jun 2023 #5
The opinion is by one Phillip Aaron Lacovara, who, per Google, seems professionally legit. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #19
oh ffs Celerity Jun 2023 #3
Heh. tanyev Jun 2023 #4
Obama wouldn't do it no matter how much you or we like the idea. Claustrum Jun 2023 #6
Technically he's not term-limited; the 22nd Amendment says "No person shall be *elected* Ocelot II Jun 2023 #10
Isn't the VP position still "elected" office? Claustrum Jun 2023 #12
The VP is an elected office but that's not how the amendment is worded - Ocelot II Jun 2023 #13
What about 12th amendment? Willis88 Jun 2023 #39
The 12th does not apply here. former9thward Jun 2023 #46
That's a highly dubious interpretation, and you'd be relying on the Supreme Court to decide it muriel_volestrangler Jun 2023 #76
I agree with this Willis88 Jun 2023 #77
Lol. BlackSkimmer Jun 2023 #7
Not a chance Progressive dog Jun 2023 #8
Why are you trying to erase our great VP Harris? mcar Jun 2023 #9
That would be the wrong takeaway Willis88 Jun 2023 #11
you have the wrong site in your bias link btw Celerity Jun 2023 #21
It is anti-Biden trash. Demsrule86 Jun 2023 #27
Sure mcar Jun 2023 #33
Again with the Kamala "The Invisible VP" Harris crap. betsuni Jun 2023 #14
Please, don't give Republicans any ideas. J_William_Ryan Jun 2023 #15
Why do people waste their time with things like this? brooklynite Jun 2023 #16
The 22nd amendment wouldn't prevent him from stepping in Ocelot II Jun 2023 #36
Will Trump pick Lincoln? H2O Man Jun 2023 #17
Thats funny . obnoxiousdrunk Jun 2023 #18
Constitutionally impossible, I think Stinky The Clown Jun 2023 #20
See post #10. The 22nd Amendment says nobody can be *elected* president more than twice. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #24
It is a ridiculous idea and Kamala Harris has done a good job. Demsrule86 Jun 2023 #28
Yes on both counts. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #29
Then the author is full of shite mcar Jun 2023 #35
But he's ineligible to be VP too Polybius Jun 2023 #48
No, the 22nd Amendment doesn't apply to VPs. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #52
I disagree Polybius Jun 2023 #53
The 22nd Amendment says specifically that nobody can be *elected* to the presidency Ocelot II Jun 2023 #54
If he's on the ticket and it wins in 2024, then he can't serve as VP because it counts as a 3rd time Polybius Jun 2023 #55
No, it doesn't. The ticket isn't the office. A22 does not refer to the VP at all. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #56
Yes, it does Polybius Jun 2023 #57
Show me where it does. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #59
See my edited comment with one link Polybius Jun 2023 #60
What's "Zippia" and how is it credible authority? Ocelot II Jun 2023 #66
The only Amendment that was ever nullified was the 18th Polybius Jun 2023 #73
that is actually incorrect Celerity Jun 2023 #25
This article suggests my theory is correct. Stinky The Clown Jun 2023 #43
Howzit hangin, 88? EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #22
yep, not a good number, nor is 14 Celerity Jun 2023 #30
In over 30 years of knocking around the intertubes EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #38
Swedish ice cream bars Celerity Jun 2023 #41
I wonder when '88' as nazi code first started spreading among adherents EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #42
Well spotted. Whatever it means, he got to 101 posts. Hekate Jun 2023 #69
They always overreach EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #75
It was a big sacrifice for Michelle when she was First Lady. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #26
the article is referencing Barack, not Michelle (unless I misunderstand your reply) Celerity Jun 2023 #34
I think the point is that Michelle would likely not buy in. carpetbagger Jun 2023 #62
No blogslug Jun 2023 #32
Why would he? NH Ethylene Jun 2023 #37
Don't do it. keithbvadu2 Jun 2023 #40
Since President Obama has already served 2 terms as President, DemocraticPatriot Jun 2023 #44
It may be a bad idea but nothing in the Constitution prevents it. former9thward Jun 2023 #47
I presume he could serve 20 years as an SC Justice--- DemocraticPatriot Jun 2023 #50
What about this: Polybius Jun 2023 #51
The article relies on an opinion from Gary Nordlinger. former9thward Jun 2023 #61
PBO would make a great ambassador too, if he's willing FakeNoose Jun 2023 #67
If he needs to do that in order to win pinkstarburst Jun 2023 #45
ridiculous jcgoldie Jun 2023 #49
lmao why would Biden even need a hail mary? he's going to be fine in 2024. Beautiful Disaster Jun 2023 #58
So now Teh Democratic Establishment is going to "inspire" voting? betsuni Jun 2023 #63
++++ emulatorloo Jun 2023 #72
Idiotic shit like this is trotted out weekly now... MerryBlooms Jun 2023 #64
Not this shit again, and not Michelle either. Kamala Harris. FFS we can do it Jun 2023 #65
Not a good idea, cf. Putin carpetbagger Jun 2023 #68
I'm sorry ... this isn't a good idea FakeNoose Jun 2023 #70
CEO of the Messenger canetoad Jun 2023 #74
12th Amendment... Wounded Bear Jun 2023 #78
Oh FFS! niyad Jun 2023 #79
Why would a sitting President who is the clear favorite to be re-elected in 2024 lees1975 Jun 2023 #80

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
1. Oh, FFS. It's stupid and it's not going to happen.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:14 PM
Jun 2023

And all this idiotic speculation about Biden's running mate impliedly disses Kamala Harris and it needs to stop.

betsuni

(25,472 posts)
31. Variation on the Michael Moore prediction that the only way Democrats would win in 2020
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:05 PM
Jun 2023

was if a beloved celebrity like Oprah or Tom Hanks ran. Stupid.

The erasure of Kamala Harris (one of the most progressive senators who actually got bills passed) is disgusting.

DemocraticPatriot

(4,347 posts)
71. Yes, and PJB has already stated that Kamala will remain on the ticket in '24....
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:51 PM
Jun 2023

I wish she had more exposure and better 'approval ratings',
but when did any Vice President have 'approval' close to that
of their President ??


Still, the campaign team needs to work on this...


Hekate

(90,658 posts)
2. President Biden already has a running mate, & she is abundantly qualified
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:15 PM
Jun 2023

May I ask why you would want him to ditch VP Kamala Harris?



Willis88

(109 posts)
5. Agreed. I don't want her replaced.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:16 PM
Jun 2023

I'm asking if this website is biased because it's something I've never heard of before.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
19. The opinion is by one Phillip Aaron Lacovara, who, per Google, seems professionally legit.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:41 PM
Jun 2023

"He has served as counsel to the Watergate special prosecutor, deputy U.S. solicitor general and president of the D.C. Bar." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/27/trump-insurrection-prosecute-nixon-pardon/ However, his spin is extraordinarily negative (he claims Biden is so unpopular that he is likely to lose the election in 2024 unless he does something extraordinary, and Harris is "faced with the prospect of a career-ending defeat partly of her own making" ). He doesn't seem to be overtly Trumpish or GOP, but he identified as "conservative" in a letter urging the speedy confirmation of Judge Ketanji Jackson to the Supreme Court. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Letter-from-conservatives-endorsing-Jackson-to-SCOTUS%20(1).pdf

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
6. Obama wouldn't do it no matter how much you or we like the idea.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:16 PM
Jun 2023

VP is supposed to fill in as president if anything happens to the president and Obama is term limited out of being the president so he should be disqualified as the VP.

Imagine Reagan or Bush tries this. We are getting into the Putin manipulation of being president and that not president but high position with a puppet president to later become president again BS. We don't want a system similar to that.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
10. Technically he's not term-limited; the 22nd Amendment says "No person shall be *elected*
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:22 PM
Jun 2023

to the office of the President more than twice." If he were to become president on account of the disability of the president he wouldn't have been elected. But it's still a stupid idea. He wouldn't do it; Michelle wouldn't let him do it; and the suggestion is disrespectful of VP Harris.

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
12. Isn't the VP position still "elected" office?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:24 PM
Jun 2023

This is weird and should be written into law. If there is anything we learn from TFG's presidency, it's that we need more well written law instead of relying on people doing the right thing or electing a normal and rational person into the position. We know republicans will game the system if it's not written out in black and white law.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
13. The VP is an elected office but that's not how the amendment is worded -
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:29 PM
Jun 2023

it says nobody can be elected president more than twice. It IS written into law; the Constitution is the controlling law.

Willis88

(109 posts)
39. What about 12th amendment?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:19 PM
Jun 2023

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

former9thward

(31,987 posts)
46. The 12th does not apply here.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:32 PM
Jun 2023

Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president (over 35, natural citizen and resident for 14 years). If he became president he would not be "elected" to the office a third time.

The 12th was put in the Constitution to keep foreign born people from getting the presidency thru the vice presidency.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,310 posts)
76. That's a highly dubious interpretation, and you'd be relying on the Supreme Court to decide it
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 09:51 AM
Jun 2023

If you assert that "the 12th was put in the Constitution to keep foreign born people from getting the presidency thru the vice presidency", then we can assert that "the 20th was put in the Constitution to keep people who had served as President for over 6 years from becoming president again". And that would have the advantage of being obvious.

It would be the world's dumbest move to rely on this (or, really, any) Supreme Court making a highly dubious decision based on the disputed letter of the law rather than the acknowledged spirit. Plus, it would make the USA look like Russia if it succeeded.

Willis88

(109 posts)
77. I agree with this
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 10:14 AM
Jun 2023

I can see loopholes for a future manipulation by TFG and his kids if precedent was set here.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
8. Not a chance
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:18 PM
Jun 2023

First, Biden has already decided on a running mate. Second, Barack Obama would not run. Third, Biden does not need a hail mary.

Willis88

(109 posts)
11. That would be the wrong takeaway
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:24 PM
Jun 2023

It's a concept I didn't think was possible Constitutionally nor have I heard it before today. Sharing the link does not mean I endorse the idea. I was wondering if the source (The Messenger) is right wing trash or legitimist perspective. Never heard of them before either.

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
21. you have the wrong site in your bias link btw
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:48 PM
Jun 2023
Vice-President Obama for 2024?
Read this, thought it was interesting.

https://themessenger.com/opinion/bidens-2024-hail-mary-name-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate



but

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/messenger

The Messenger (Iowa)
Bias Rating Not Rated
Type News Media
Region Iowa
Website messengernews.net



here is the correct one

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/messenger-media-bias



J_William_Ryan

(1,753 posts)
15. Please, don't give Republicans any ideas.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:33 PM
Jun 2023

We’d be stuck with a third GWB term – and no one wants that.

brooklynite

(94,510 posts)
16. Why do people waste their time with things like this?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:36 PM
Jun 2023

1) Obama doesn't want to run.

2) If elected VP, he wouldn't be able to step in as President.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
36. The 22nd amendment wouldn't prevent him from stepping in
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:07 PM
Jun 2023

because he wouldn't have been elected president twice. Nevertheless, it's a dumb idea and he wouldn't do it/ Biden won't need a "Hail Mary" anyhow.

Stinky The Clown

(67,792 posts)
20. Constitutionally impossible, I think
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:44 PM
Jun 2023

He is not qualified to be president since he's already served two terms.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
24. See post #10. The 22nd Amendment says nobody can be *elected* president more than twice.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:51 PM
Jun 2023

But a VP who becomes president because the elected president is unable to serve hasn't been elected president.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
29. Yes on both counts.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:03 PM
Jun 2023

The author posits that both Biden and Harris are so horribly unpopular that Biden can't win the 2024 election unless he does something drastic and unexpected. This, of course, is rank bullshit. This is the kind of thinking that caused McCain to choose Palin as his running mate, and we saw how that turned out (he'd have lost anyhow, but maybe with fewer embarrassing incidents along the way).

mcar

(42,307 posts)
35. Then the author is full of shite
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:07 PM
Jun 2023

Biden/Harris are not "horribly unpopular." Author is basing this nonsense on a false premise.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
52. No, the 22nd Amendment doesn't apply to VPs.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:49 PM
Jun 2023

It sets a limit on the number of times an individual can be elected to the presidency but there is no such limitation on the office of vice president, meaning an eligible person could hold the office as long as voters continued to vote for electors who in turn would reelect the person to the office; one could even serve under different presidents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_the_United_States#:~:text=While%20the%20Twenty%2DSecond%20Amendment,turn%20would%20reelect%20the%20person

Polybius

(15,390 posts)
53. I disagree
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:52 PM
Jun 2023

I read it as once a President has served two terms, he can no longer be VP either. It would go to the Supreme Court.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
54. The 22nd Amendment says specifically that nobody can be *elected* to the presidency
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:58 PM
Jun 2023

more than twice. If the VP becomes president because the president can't serve, he hasn't been elected to the presidency.

Polybius

(15,390 posts)
55. If he's on the ticket and it wins in 2024, then he can't serve as VP because it counts as a 3rd time
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:03 PM
Jun 2023

I don't think Obama can be "elected" on a Presidential ticket as VP. But.................


He might be able to sneak in if he is appointed VP now (say Harris steps down and Biden nominates Obama, and he's confirmed).

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
56. No, it doesn't. The ticket isn't the office. A22 does not refer to the VP at all.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:07 PM
Jun 2023

The legal guys seem to be in agreement on this. But it's all academic because it isn't going to happen, and the article author's underlying premise - that Biden and Harris are so disastrously unpopular that the ticket is doomed and Biden can't win unless he dumps Harris and picks Obama - is wrong and stupid.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
59. Show me where it does.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:10 PM
Jun 2023

Here's the 22nd amendment in its entirety.

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

Ocelot II

(115,681 posts)
66. What's "Zippia" and how is it credible authority?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:31 PM
Jun 2023

As far as I can tell it's just a job board, not a legal resource; they don't cite any cases or other legal authority and their argument is circular. They say "The 12th amendment states that an individual cannot run for the vice presidency if they are not eligible to be president. That's because they would have to become president if the sitting president died or was unable to fulfill their duties. Since a former president would be ineligible to be president, they are unable to become vice president." This is true as far as it goes, but what the 12th actually says is "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." Since the 12th was enacted long before the 22nd, it therefore did not and could not have taken into consideration the issue of term limitations. It governs qualification for service; that is, a vice presidential candidate would not be qualified for the position unless he/she were also 35 years old and a natural-born citizen (the constitutional qualifications), like the president. #22, however, relates to qualification for election. Here's an actual lawyer's opinion. https://cornerstonelaw.us/22nd-amendment-doesnt-say-think-says/

Polybius

(15,390 posts)
73. The only Amendment that was ever nullified was the 18th
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 12:36 AM
Jun 2023

So the part saying "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States" is still in effect. The 22nd does not nullify that that part of the 12th.

No point in going on, we're never going to agree, even if the SC ruled on this 9-0 (well, I'd change my mind if it were 9-0 ). I'm sure we agree on most other topics.

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
25. that is actually incorrect
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:51 PM
Jun 2023

he just cannot BE ELECTED to POTUS again

the article actually does do a good job of explaining that, despite my disagreeing with it that Obama should or would run as VP

EYESORE 9001

(25,932 posts)
38. In over 30 years of knocking around the intertubes
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:12 PM
Jun 2023

I’ve never seen an association with that number come to anything good. You’d think that it’d be common knowledge by now.

EYESORE 9001

(25,932 posts)
42. I wonder when '88' as nazi code first started spreading among adherents
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:53 PM
Jun 2023

I certainly never found out until at least the late ‘80s with the advent of the internet. Not sure when I actually read about it.

EYESORE 9001

(25,932 posts)
75. They always overreach
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 08:14 AM
Jun 2023

I saw some long-time DUers ‘out’ themselves as RW trolls in 2004. Some were better at disguising it than others. Most of those didn’t draw undue attention because of an obvious username. Some garnered thousands of posts before yanking the disguise and doing a victory dance before receiving the granite cookie. They didn’t choose usernames incorporating code for ‘heil Hitler,’ I can tell ya that! As far as disruptions go, this one is doing it poorly.

LiberalFighter

(50,897 posts)
26. It was a big sacrifice for Michelle when she was First Lady.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 07:54 PM
Jun 2023

And considering the wackos out there they would want to keep themselves safe.


AND there would be negatives by dumping Kamala.

carpetbagger

(4,391 posts)
62. I think the point is that Michelle would likely not buy in.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:25 PM
Jun 2023

They seem to make decisions like a healthy couple.

blogslug

(37,999 posts)
32. No
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:05 PM
Jun 2023

Stop it.

Also, The Messenger is owned by the guy who used to own The Hill and partially funded my Mark Penn. It sucks.

NH Ethylene

(30,809 posts)
37. Why would he?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 08:11 PM
Jun 2023

He's done his stint and it can't have been pleasant. He deserves his retirement. And no Michelle either. She gracefully endured 8 years of right-wing demonizing and politics does not interest her.

DemocraticPatriot

(4,347 posts)
44. Since President Obama has already served 2 terms as President,
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:30 PM
Jun 2023

and thus cannot succeed to the office,

the entire idea of him as a VP candidate is silly... so I did not bother to read the article link you posted....


However, I would certainly support him in any other effort for elective office---

There is nothing to prevent him from becoming once again a United States Senator,
or a member of the House---

or a Supreme Court Justice, which many here dream of
(although that could not happen without an absence on the SC)


former9thward

(31,987 posts)
47. It may be a bad idea but nothing in the Constitution prevents it.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:39 PM
Jun 2023

The 22nd amendment prevents him from being elected to the presidency a third time -- not the VP. The 12th applies to foreign born people and Obama is natural born.

In the real political world he is far too old to be a SC Justice nominee.

DemocraticPatriot

(4,347 posts)
50. I presume he could serve 20 years as an SC Justice---
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 09:47 PM
Jun 2023

is that too little? I suppose we would prefer someone in their late 30s...

He is now 61 or 62--

but it doesn't matter anyway, there appear to be no likely openings for many years---

unless we get lucky and some rightwing justice walks in front of a bus---



Maybe I should reconsider my options, and work towards becoming a bus driver...


PS Yes, there is nothing to prevent him from becoming VP,
but what is the point of that ?


former9thward

(31,987 posts)
61. The article relies on an opinion from Gary Nordlinger.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:20 PM
Jun 2023

No offense to Mr. Nordlinger but he is a part time poly sci prof. There is nothing in his background to indicate he is an expert in constitutional law. So his opinion is as good as anyone here.

And his opinion is:

For example, a vice president must be at least 35 years old, and they must be born in the United States, just as a President must follow these requirements. Nordlinger said this likely applies to term limits as well.

"If anyone tried this," he said. "It would for sure end up at the Supreme Court. Because that’s who decides conflicts within the constitution.”

Wow, really? Cases go to the Supreme Court? I never would have guessed. Yes, I am sure it would go to the SC. And I think it is not likely that it applies to term limits. Say whatever you want about the court but it does not like to overturn political judgments no matter the party. And it is very likely it would not overturn the selection of a major party's choice for VP.

FakeNoose

(32,634 posts)
67. PBO would make a great ambassador too, if he's willing
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:35 PM
Jun 2023

The man is so popular around the world.

I'd love to see him appointed to the Supreme Court. But the way things are right now, I'm not sure it can happen. Several things need to be settled with current SCOTUS personnel before we can talk about "changing the guard."

 

Beautiful Disaster

(667 posts)
58. lmao why would Biden even need a hail mary? he's going to be fine in 2024.
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:10 PM
Jun 2023

Reminds me of all the talk about Obama dumping Biden for Hillary in 2012.

betsuni

(25,472 posts)
63. So now Teh Democratic Establishment is going to "inspire" voting?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:26 PM
Jun 2023

I thought Teh Establishment was bad.

MerryBlooms

(11,767 posts)
64. Idiotic shit like this is trotted out weekly now...
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:26 PM
Jun 2023

Don't forget Oprah! We have an exceptional VP. Her name is, Kamala Harris. Every time you or anyone else posts garbage trying to erase her, I'm happy to push back, and happy to see DU join me. The lack of support for our first black woman VP disgusts me. All under the guise of, Thought this was interesting, or Just asking questions... Where have I heard that before? Hmm... 🤨

carpetbagger

(4,391 posts)
68. Not a good idea, cf. Putin
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:38 PM
Jun 2023

We have the two-term limit for a reason. I think it practically makes no sense for Biden to go with Obama, even if Harris were not the obvious and qualified choice. First, off, unless you have a working majority in at least the Senate, Obama wouldn't get seated. And it really doesn't make sense to leave a succession fight in the air where the USSC or the House Speaker could take the presidency away by law, rule, or mob.

Beyond that, nothing good ever comes from taking a term-limited head of government and moving them to a puppeteer position. That's what happened in Russia when Putin termed out the first time. It defeats the purpose of the 22nd Amendment, which is critically important now that we've had a number of rogue presidents who have shielded criminality behind the power of the office.

FakeNoose

(32,634 posts)
70. I'm sorry ... this isn't a good idea
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 10:43 PM
Jun 2023

It's a slap in the face to Kamala Harris, for one thing. PBO would make an awesome Ambassador to one of our major allies (Canada, or UK perhaps?) But really, Obama is doing so much already as our Good Will Ambassador that I don't think he even needs an official appointment or title. Obama is loved everywhere and so is the entire Obama family.

canetoad

(17,152 posts)
74. CEO of the Messenger
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 01:06 AM
Jun 2023

Is Jimmy Finklestein, former owner of The Hill. There's plenty about him if you search.

One example: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/20/business/the-hill-sale-nexstar-media.html

Mr. Finkelstein, the heir to a New York real estate fortune and a longtime associate of former President Donald J. Trump, said that he had purchased control of The Hill in 2014, when it was primarily a print publication that covered Congress, at a fraction of the valuation he sold for. He said he had not always enjoyed the attempts by Mr. Trump and another old New York associate, the Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, to pressure him for favorable coverage.

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
78. 12th Amendment...
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 10:21 AM
Jun 2023
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.[1]"


Pres Obama is not eligible to be VP.

lees1975

(3,845 posts)
80. Why would a sitting President who is the clear favorite to be re-elected in 2024
Mon Jun 5, 2023, 10:24 AM
Jun 2023

and who has a strong, well-qualified VP, want to pull some kind of political stunt because the media crazies think he needs it to win?

If Trump winds up escaping justice and becomes the GOP nominee, which is not a sure thing at this point, Biden wins an easy electoral college and popular vote victory. If one of the other wannabees, like pitiful Nikki Haley or Ron the Fascist become the GOP nominee, it's a Biden landslide--think LBJ 1964.

The straight-up, straightforward, call-em-out kind of campaigning that is already coming out of the Biden campaign is exactly the right strategy. Have you seen ads for Adam Frisch in Colorado, or Lucas Kunce in Missouri? Campaigning like that is going to win elections.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vice-President Obama for ...