General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow legit is Thom Hartmann?
Ive heard the name a lot, but know little of his veracity.
elleng
(137,338 posts)emulatorloo
(45,655 posts)pnwmom
(109,653 posts)on the Russian propaganda station, RT.
emulatorloo
(45,655 posts)Sanity Claws
(22,077 posts)I first heard of him when he was with Air America, back in the early 2000s. Every Fridays he had Brunch with Bernie (Sanders) in which he interviewed Bernie Sanders and Bernie was given free rein to discuss his point of view on issues in the country.
Any friend of Bernie is a friend of mine.
SalviaBlue
(3,034 posts)Serious/XM, Free Speech TV, etc. He has published numerous books on many subjects.
He is legit.
nolabear
(43,333 posts)He does check in here from time to time.
emulatorloo
(45,655 posts)hlthe2b
(107,272 posts)and some, including Thom accepted air time on RT, the Russian network. I've not seen any evidence his content was influenced and he is no longer associated with RT as far as I know. But, that did rankle some progressives.
Beastly Boy
(11,511 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 22, 2023, 10:10 PM - Edit history (2)
Attached is a random Thom Hartmann segment on RT which I plucked from youtube:
Note the banner on the bottom of the screen. It contains information exclusively chosen by the RT editorial board, the employees of Russian government, not Hartmann. It is absolutely evidence of Hartmann's content being influenced by RT, the mouthpiece of Russia's government, running parallel to the content presented by Hartmann, with Hartmann's knowledge and implicit approval.
hlthe2b
(107,272 posts)Explaining why he went there is not the same as defending the choice.
Nor am I suggesting I agree with each and every opinion, stance, or position he's ever taken--i don't. I used to listen to him many many years ago when progressive radio (Air America Radio) was a thing. And I'm well aware that he's a long-term DU member. On the former, I don't agree with every Duer on everything either. But, I damned well am not a Russia/Putin defender. And apparently neither is Hartmann given he's now working out of his cramped home office (and has been for quite some time before the invasion), rather than the previously provided studios of RT.
Beastly Boy
(11,511 posts)pundit, to justify working in cooperation with the media mouthpiece that was branded by US intelligence as "The Kremlins principal international propaganda outlet" in their report (https://www.scribd.com/document/335885580/Unclassified-version-of-intelligence-report-on-Russian-hacking-during-the-2016-election#download&from_embed). This report was made public in January 2017, and I have no doubt that Hartmann was aware of it then, while he continued collaborating with RT for eight months afterwards. I can give Hartmann some benefit of doubt, despite his otherwise perceptive acumen, that he was not aware of RT's role prior to the intelligence report being made public, but his continued collaboration with RT erases my doubt completely.
His continued association with Trump enablers despite full awareness of their subversive interference which lead to Trump's victory in 2016 is more consistent with an image of an opportunistic demagogue than that of a highly principled intellectual which Hartmann is trying to project.
I am, without addressing his unquestionably sharp intellect for which I am giving him full credit, and without addressing his political ideology which I find objectionable on many levels, also trying to explain why he went there, and the explanation I am coming up with doesn't look good.
And his membership in DU doesn't absolve him of the role, however tertiary, he played in the 2016 elections.
Celerity
(47,252 posts)some time now.
you said
Bollocks.
Your own video betrays that posisting. Hartmann rips the then FL governor, now US Senate thug, Rick Scott for climate change denialism, and correctly says he is backed the the RW Koch brothers disinfo funding machine. He also pounds Mitch McConnell and destroys the two RW shills, Scott Pruitt from Red State, and Gianno Caldwell from the right wing Project 21.
Also, the crawl on the bottom of the screen was just bog standard news. There was nothing nefarious, unless, in the only case (out of all the stories) of bad news about the US ($500m worth of weapons sent to Yemen were lost), you are also saying that the western major MSM was doing the same anti US agitprop thing.
for example:
Hartmann did not work for RT. He exchanged his show and labour for access to hundreds of millions of global homes, plus carriage and the studio/production. His show was syndicated and he earned money from his sponsors. He was not paid a salary by RT, as I have seen some others falsely claim (no, he was not paid a salary by Putin, another falsehood that a certain 'rightward-moved CNN of Licht/Zaslav/Malone'-loving person in particular had been trying to say/revive here for months, before that 'rainfront' left the DU environs) and again, most importantly, he had complete editorial control over his show.
If Hartmann was this crypto Putinite malevolent force for disingo and agitprop, as some try to keep inferring/implying, then why has this board's owners allowed him to remain a member in good standing f DU for years?
https://www.facebook.com/ThomHartmannProgram/posts/thom-hartmann-will-be-leaving-the-big-picture-tv-show-on-rt-tv-and-free-speech-t/10155794661834448/
Hartmann hosted a one-hour daily TV show at 7 pm. ET Monday to Friday, The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann, which was editorially directed by his wife and was broadcast from the Washington, D.C., studios of the RT America news network. The show featured many conservative guests who routinely sparred with Hartmann. Hartmann co-produced the program with RT, who provided studio and carriage, while Hartmann retained full editorial control of his programming. The RT network aired the program via Dish Network, DirecTV, and on selected local-origination and public-access television cable TV channels globally. After hosting the program for seven years, Hartmann announced his departure as host on September 29, 2017.
more background
https://prospect.org/culture/broadcasting-belly-beast/
FEBRUARY 16, 2012
snip
But despite that success, chances are that most of the influential people in his new hometown have barely heard of Hartmann. That's partly because his take on politics is less about the inside game and more about citizen empowerment. It's also because in the corridors of power, it's television that confers prestige, even if the audiences are relatively small, as they are for most cable shows. So when Hartmann had the chance in late 2010 to get his own TV show-even if it required an unusual arrangement with an upstart, foreign-owned network-he packed up his life in the gentler environs of Portland, Oregon, and moved to what he calls "the belly of the beast."
Hartmann starts each day at his radio studio, then hops across town to the television studios of RT, a network formerly known as Russia Today. The network began its U.S. operations by airing Russian programs for the immigrant community but has recently tried to turn itself into something like a version of Al Jazeera English, a true international news organization with lots of U.S.-centered content that just happens to be owned by the Russian government. Hartmann is a bit defensive about the fact that this is where his program airs, but he labors to make clear the particulars of his relationship with the network. He owns his program, and RT has no editorial say in its content. RT gets an hour of nightly programming from him, and Hartmann in turn gets his show on cable systems across the country. He also gets to use RT's Washington facilities to produce the show.
snip
Hartmann explains that when he was young, his father was an activist with the local Republican Party in Lansing, Michigan. "I went door to door with him in 1964-I was 13 years old-for Barry Goldwater." Hartman watched William F. Buckley on television with his father every week, and he thought Buckley's Firing Line "was the smartest show I had ever seen. It totally blew me away." His admiration for Buckley remains to this day, but by the time he was a teenager, "I had come to agree more with my grandfather, who was an old-fashioned 1930s socialist," and arguments in his house grew more intense. "The thing that I learned over the years was how to have those debates with my father and not get thrown out of the house, not have any blood on the floor." That experience carries over to his shows. "My goal in my conversations with conservatives is not to create a spectacle, and not to win the argument, not to prove that I'm the smartest guy in the room or that I'm the tough warrior and I can smack down people." The result is a rarity-discussions between people who disagree strongly but manage to avoid anger and shrillness. This may be why Hartmann has more good things to say about the Tea Party movement (its grassroots elements, at least) than most liberals. In fact, he sees the potential for a genuine alliance between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. The activist flavor of his show comes from both the guests and the host; he ends his program by telling viewers, "Don't forget, democracy begins with you. Get out there, get active. Tag, you're it."
Since the demise of Air America in 2010 (Hartmann was the network's headliner in its dying days, replacing Al Franken when the latter began his Senate run), the liberal establishment has turned its attention away from talk radio. Someone like Hartmann, who spent the last decade fielding calls from citizens all over the country, brings an outsider sensibility that fits uneasily in Washington. He may reach more people every day than some of his peers like Rachel Maddow, but it's going to take a lot of work for Hartmann to crack that top tier of media stardom. You can't do it without television, and you probably can't do it unless your show is carried on one of the major cable networks. At this point, most of the powerful Democrats in Washington probably have no idea that the country's top progressive radio host is broadcasting just blocks from Capitol Hill. Hartmann insists that he loves the control he gets from owning his own programs, being able to talk about whatever he wants and to ignore the insider Washington culture that is often so disconnected from people's lives. But he won't deny that he's ambitious. "If MSNBC came calling," he says, "I wouldn't say no."
Beastly Boy
(11,511 posts)Did I ever say that RT had editorial control over Harmann's show? No. But editorial influence, absolutely. As I mentioned, the contents of the banner on the bottom of the screen in each and every show is not controlled by Hartmann and is not subject of his editorial decisions. Yet, they make a significant portion of the content presented on his show, subject to the editorial decisions of Putin's propaganda mouthpiece alone. Nor did I say Hartmann worked for RT. He worked WITH RT, which is hardly complimentary as compared to working FOR them. Nor did I go into the content of Hartmann's own editorial decisions, but I doubt very much that the Putin-controlled propaganda organ would give it an outlet were they not to find it useful for Putin's propaganda (and/or useful in advancing Putin's propaganda via the aforementioned banner device). Hartmann have full editorial control of his programs, but he had zero editorial control of the screen they are displayed on.
I picked the video at random, not to scrutinize the contents of the banner, but to establish its existence outside of Hartmann's editorial control. It will take an examination of the entirety of the content displayed by the banner throughout Hartmann's appearances on RT to make a halfass accurate assessment of what RT was up to. But something tells me that you will find precious little in those headlines, if anything at all, that, unlike the MSM coverage in a year or so before and after the n2016 elections, would be complimentary to Hillary or the Obama administration. Just a hunch, which you are welcome to disprove.
As far as Hartmann's membership on DU, I believe he is entitled to keep it as long as he doesn't violate DU's terms of use. What he does in the privacy of his own home, or on a show broadcast by Putin's propaganda organ, does not affect his standing on DU.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)It's state-sponsored propaganda. Providing it with any legitimacy was always questionable, at best, and certainly misguided.
I understand that some will do anything for a platform and that the options are limited, but we should probably be a little more selective. I also found it curious how people would (appropriately) tear into Jill Stein for her involvement with the network, but many other "favorites" got a pass.
hlthe2b
(107,272 posts)I don't defend but give context. He left as soon as he found an alternative I'm told. Saying it should rankle everyone (as if it didn't bother me) is nothing more than an attack on the messenger-i.e., me, IMO. I don't deserve it-- for merely stating the background for the OP.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)2014 was the beginning of the Russo-Ukranian War. It was also the year Putin invaded Crimea, which was basically a warm-up for Ukraine.
Hartmann was on RT for three more years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ukrainian_War
RT was state-supported propaganda then, as it is now. I find it curious that you think I'm attacking you personally for suggesting that we should all take issue with and not provide legitimacy to Russian propaganda. I stand by my statement.
hlthe2b
(107,272 posts)for Putin--particularly during his 2004 "LOVE ME" tour.
Here is just one such major interview with NPR that showed him the respect normally accorded a NATO ally leader:
https://legacy.npr.org/news/specials/putin/index.html
So, your argument loses its oomph--majorly. Not to mention that MSM and even our foreign policy was to all but ignore his advances in Crimea. But again, DO NOT ACCUSE ME NOR SUGGEST THAT I AM DEFENDING RT or PUTIN. It is disingenuous and knowingly so. It doesn't make you more intellectual nor morally superior when you attack the messenger for merely stating the context of the issue, especially if you imply something not factual in terms of poster belief/intent.
Beastly Boy
(11,511 posts)the thread is about Hartmann and his affiliation with Putin's propaganda machine, which is separate and apart from MSM. You should not presume that anyone is accusing you of anything merely by disagreeing with your assessment of the nature of Hartmann's affiliation with RT.
Saying that an argument has lost its oomph without examining what the oomph we are talking about is, and instead deflecting to a subject not directly related to Hartmann's association with RT, is pretty unfair.
hlthe2b
(107,272 posts)My comments were in response to another poster;s issue/comments. So, I'll leave it at that. Sorry you did not follow...
Grasswire2
(13,743 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 23, 2023, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)
Was for decades.
multigraincracker
(34,562 posts)1990s very helpful. Very prolific author.
Hekate
(95,635 posts)gab13by13
(25,697 posts)I go to.
Beastly Boy
(11,511 posts)Legitimate as a promoter of certain popular (and populist) left wing views? Absolutely.
Legitimate as a man of integrity? Questionable.
Legitimate as an objective scholar of the political left? Not at all.
Recycle_Guru
(2,973 posts)but I questioned hos decision to be on Russian propaganda channel for so long.
cbabe
(4,402 posts)Thom Hartmann Program - YouTube
Talkers Magazine names Thom Hartmann as the #8 most important talk show host in America, and the #1 most important progressive host, in their "Heavy Hundred" ranking. Check it out at...
https://www.thomhartmann.com people guests
A Selection of Thom's Guests | Thom Hartmann
A selection of guests who have appeared with Thom Danielle Blevins - Journalist, lawyer Tim Canova - Activist, attorney, educator, commentator Stephen F. Cohen - Professor of American Studies, Contributor to The Nation Curtis Ellis - American Jobs Alliance Brad Friedman - The Brad Blog John Fugelsang - Political Commentator, comedian John Nichols - National Affairs Correspondent The Nation
https://tunein.com podcasts Progressive-Talk The-Hartmann-Report-p34417
The Hartman - Listen to All Episodes | Progressive Talk - TuneIn
Westwood One. The Hartmann Report is an independent daily podcast hosted by award winning, author, radio & TV host Thom Hartmann. Thom's podcast highlights the bigger picture behind politics, science and culture through discussion and debate. Catch Thom's live show Monday through Friday noon ET / 9am PT- www.thomhartmann.com.
https://freespeech.org stories ro-khanna-on-how-medicare-for-all-saves-lives-money
Ro Khanna on How Medicare For All Saves Lives & Money
Congressmember Khanna joins Thom Hartmann and callers during our virtual town halls to answer important questions like this one on healthcare. -- The Thom Hartmann Program covers diverse topics including immigration reform, government intrusion, privacy, foreign policy, and domestic issues.
https://podcasts.apple.com us podcast greg-palasts-vigilante-movie id1265276064?i=1000584847430
?The Hartmann Report: GREG PALAST'S "VIGILANTE MOVIE" on ... - Apple
The Hartmann Report. A new film about Republican voter suppression is available online from investigative reporter Greg Palast. Can it make a difference with the midterms less than a week away? Plus, Progressive leader Mark Pocan joins Thom to answer listener questions.
https://www.amazon.com Hidden-History-American-Oligarchy-Reclaiming dp 1523091584
The Thom Hartmann Hidden History Series - amazon.com
Thom Hartmann is the four-time Project Censored Award-winning, New York Times best-selling author of 25 books currently in print in over a dozen languages on five continents. Hartmann is also an internationally known speaker on culture and communications, an author, and an innovator in the fields of psychiatry, ecology, and economics.
NewHendoLib
(60,655 posts)thebigidea
(13,427 posts)Just like I can't trust Katrina vanden Heuvel's reign at The Nation which alienated a lot of longtime contributors and saw that outfit turn Pro-Russia and Anti-Ukraine. Just search their archives for "Ukraine" and you can see years and years worth of spin.
MurrayDelph
(5,458 posts)when he was constantly going on about wanting to impose tariffs. It wasn't the tariffs, per se, but when he had the genius idea of suggesting that in the spirit of give them something they want to get something we want he suggested swapping away birthright citizenship. In other words, he suggested giving up other people's rights to get his goals.
I said it then, and I'll say it again: that's mighty white of him.
doc03
(37,125 posts)Deuxcents
(20,440 posts)And I believe him. He admits to it and his reasons. Ive learned a lot from him as he knows our political history and gives the setting to his daily rants so we have the background on the subject. Hes well traveled and has very knowledgeable guests on his programs.
JHB
(37,503 posts)...or as I usually call it, "The Vlad Channel".
So why am I not roundly condemning him? Because at the time he negotiated is contract with RT, 1) it was the early 00's, when Vlad was still in the deniability zone of what he was, and 2) in the USA there was a dire need for a liberal/left media platform, and no rich liberal/lefty was willing to fund it, the way RW media had been funded for over 20 years by that point. Vladdy-boy was perfectly willing to support American critics of US (Bush Administration) policy, so it's no wonder RT carried his show until 2017, when he departed the relationship.
pnwmom
(109,653 posts)eShirl
(18,911 posts)Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)Now he does his show from an office in the early afternoon. It's quite a step-down.
I listen to his show on Free Speech TV occasionally. I'd tune it more often, but there is so much competition for my media attention.
Unfortunately, Thom stayed too long at RT after it became patently obvious RT was a propaganda channel.
RT wanted Thom because he gave them an air of legitimacy. But, their illegitimacy was spilling onto him.
I find him to be very insightful, but Thom sometimes gets it wrong. Several times in the last dozen or so years, he predicted that the absolute financial meltdown of the USA was imminent.
boston bean
(36,546 posts)PCIntern
(27,100 posts)I know this b/c I received PMs from DU members that he read DU posts written by me on air. I went to the replays of the shows and sure enough
betsuni
(27,358 posts)Always best to check. The populism/revolution stuff isn't correct.
Emile
(31,463 posts)milestogo
(18,592 posts)Emile
(31,463 posts)He is hands down the best truth teller out there!
Elessar Zappa
(16,232 posts)Demsrule86
(71,036 posts)again. As callers mercilessly attacked the Democratic Party-Hartmann did not refute or challenge any of their negative and many patently untrue remarks. I lasted five minutes and then changed the channel.
Response to Patterson (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MineralMan
(148,197 posts)Beyond that, I remember his opposition to Hillary Clinton. Yes, I do. Instead of her, we got Trump. So...there's my thinking about Hartmann.
Liberal In Texas
(14,754 posts)a huge Hillary supporter.
SalviaBlue
(3,034 posts)Not good enough for some people I guess.
Emile
(31,463 posts)Caliman73
(11,767 posts)It is a misattribution thing. Humans are well known for linking things together that have spurious connections.
Hartmann had a Lunch with Bernie segment on his show weekly, as well as Lunch with Mark Pocann after Bernie stopped doing it. He did however, back the Democratic candidate (Hillary Clinton) after the Primary.
That time period is kind of the the Red Scare... the "if you aren't overtly with me, you are against me" mentality was rife.
We got Trump for a lot of different reasons. Hartmann was not one of them.
Liberal In Texas
(14,754 posts)You obviously didn't ever listen to his show or know much about him now.
Oopsie Daisy
(4,769 posts)Caliman73
(11,767 posts)He has been a psychotherapist, business owner, and a radio personality for decades. He is also an author of many books. I think that he was one of the first nationally syndicated Progressive radio hosts.
I do not always agree with his opinions, and he did have a rather unfortunate business relationship with RT at one point, but he is definitely a Progressive.
obnoxiousdrunk
(3,056 posts)Liberal In Texas
(14,754 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 23, 2023, 09:23 PM - Edit history (1)
He frequently reads DU posts on his show and many times will even attribute it to the poster with their DU handle.
He is a good progressive. I've been listening to his show since he was on Air America. We would do well to have more like him with radio and/or TV shows.