General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuzanne Somers (three's company) dead at age 76
https://pagesix.com/2023/10/15/suzanne-somers-dead-at-76-following-cancer-battle/
czarjak
(12,218 posts)Response to Demovictory9 (Original post)
czarjak This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sky Jewels
(8,609 posts)RIP Suzanne.
True Dough
(19,437 posts)But remember first hearing about it in the news many years ago. If I recall correctly, she chose to stick with holistic treatments instead of chemotherapy.
RIP!
Nixie
(17,339 posts)Not that I'm a doctor, and everyone has their own personal choices, but going as aggressive against cancer is usually best from what I've heard -- mastectomy/chemo. She did a great job of fighting it for so long, though, so who is to say what could have been. She wasn't young, but maybe could have lived longer than 76.
malaise
(276,265 posts)Good for her - at my age I would certainly avoid chemo.
Ms. Toad
(35,255 posts)I'm the 5th breast cancer in 4 generations.
Two of the generations are still living (with a total of about 45 years since diagnoses) without metastasis. The two earlier generations died with cancer, not from it. I had a simple lumpectomy and radiation. My mother has had a double mastectomy - mostly because she never liked her breasts much anyway. My grandmother is the only metastasis - her diagnosis was later and, although her cancer did metastasize, she lived about 40 years after her diagnosis.
Some breast cancers are very aggressive - some aren't. Mastectomy for me would have been overkill (my opinion) - and no one even offered chemo.
I also have a second cancer - an extremely aggressive sarcoma. My treatment has been limited to watching it carefully. Radiation minimizes the risk of local recurrence - but does not alter the risk of metastasis. And, this particular kind of cancer, is not susceptible to chemo. Radiation was offered (I turned it down with the approval of the doctor I am working with most closely). The cancer is rare enough that there is not good data as to whether the risks of radiation outweigh the benefits. From a medical perspective, it was a coin toss. Again - no one even offered chemo.
triron
(22,240 posts)Bet that counts for a lot of your immune response.
Nixie
(17,339 posts)are encouraging. I know each cancer is different, as well as treatments. As I wrote that, I did think that many are not even offered chemo. I think if you have the BRCA gene, as Angelina Jolie had, that you can get an elective mastectomy. The circumstances are so vastly differing, but I have observed that a lot of the recurrences are from lumpectomies with radiation instead of more aggressive treatments. I'm so glad to hear you are going strong. It seems you and your family have caught the situations early enough to manage for long periods of time and that is the absolute best situation.
Thanks for sharing your personal journey about BC.
Ms. Toad
(35,255 posts)They are a lot better at differentiating types. They did general genetic testing, tumor testing at the beginning, and at 5 years (since the knowledge has changed during my surveillance period.
None of that was available to me grandmother or Great grandmother. I think my mom had general genetic testing.
The standard when I was diagnosed for my cancer was 5 years on one aromatase inhibitor, then 5 more years in a second. Based on the second tumor analysis, the recommendation was to skip the second aromatase inhibitor.
Preventative mastectomies are a mixed bag. I was eligible, but declined. One of the problems is that people who have mastectomies tend to believe they are safe, and get complacent about self examination (or have so much aversion to their current bodies that they can't bring themselves to check regularly). Unfortunately, no mastectomy removes all breast tissue, so there is still a risk of recurrence. Breast implants can also hide any cancer growing behind the implant.
Nixie
(17,339 posts)I've also heard of people who don't like the hormone blockers (are those the aromatase inhibitors?) and find all kinds of reasons to quit taking them. Seems like a big mistake.
You are right about the complacency. A lot of people don't comply with what their own doctors tell them. And a lot just get a late start with their care and then have to deal with more complications down the line.
So they monitor your tumor via ultrasound, I would guess. Good news that the form you have is so controllable.
Aromatase is an enzyme that is used to convert other hormones into estrogen. So aromatase inhibitors block the enzyme, which results in lower estrogen. They are pretty innocuous. I had to stop them while I was healing from a broken, since they caused leg cramps that were too painful to tolerate. Other than the cramps I had no side effects.
Surveillance for breast cancer was an annual mammogram + a visit with one of three members of the breast care team every 4 months for 5 years.
Surveillance for the sarcoma was a CT scan or x-ray every 3 months for the first two years to check for lung metastasis + manual exam to check for local recurrence. I just shifted to 6 months surveillance (for the next 3 years).
SunSeeker
(53,301 posts)Did she have a different cancer before that?
Sky Jewels
(8,609 posts)She was ...diagnosed with breast cancer in her 50s, skin cancer in her 30s, and dealt with two hyperplasia in her 20s, according to Hamel.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,609 posts)Still, that's a long time to survive without conventional therapy. After her first diagnosis, she only had a lumpectomy and radiation; no chemotherapy even though it was recommended.
Sky Jewels
(8,609 posts)This article was badly written and didn't explain that. Here's an article that does.
...diagnosed with breast cancer in her 50s, skin cancer in her 30s, and dealt with two hyperplasia in her 20s, according to Hamel.
hlthe2b
(105,503 posts)dalton99a
(83,547 posts)Elessar Zappa
(15,239 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)Somers died on Sunday morning, PEOPLE confirms. She was 76.
Suzanne Somers passed away peacefully at home in the early morning hours of October 15th. She survived an aggressive form of breast cancer for over 23 years, Somers longtime publicist R. Couri Hay wrote in a statement shared on behalf of the actress family.
Suzanne was surrounded by her loving husband Alan, her son Bruce, and her immediate family, the statement continued. Her family was gathered to celebrate her 77th birthday on October 16th. Instead, they will celebrate her extraordinary life, and want to thank her millions of fans and followers who loved her dearly.
https://people.com/suzanne-somers-dead-at-76-8358227
Liberal In Texas
(14,276 posts)I'm glad to hear her family was around.
I had a chance meeting with her several years ago. We had a pleasant conversation waiting in line for something or another.
BootinUp
(48,461 posts)dalton99a
(83,547 posts)True Dough
(19,437 posts)Jack and Chrissy are now departed. And the talented Ralph Furley (Don Knotts) is gone too, of course.
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)Died long time ago
OnlinePoker
(5,805 posts)Norman Fell and Audra Lindley were great and died in the late 90's.
Lunabell
(6,635 posts)Little Chrissy. You were the quintessential dumb blond that was a brilliant woman in reality.
JohnSJ
(95,207 posts)617Blue
(1,577 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)bdamomma
(65,390 posts)Suzanne Somers, she was something else in that role (Chrissy) RIP. You made me laugh.
Upthevibe
(8,884 posts)R.I.P.,
niyad
(118,470 posts)moof
(3,391 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)flashman13
(839 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(152,803 posts)Duppers
(28,208 posts)And she was a health-food person, according to her many interviews.
Farmer-Rick
(11,030 posts)She did advocate hormone replacement therapy. So, not sure how healthy that is.
But she seemed to do well.
Sorry to lose her. She seemed like a kind hearted person.
BonnieJW
(2,461 posts)Huge difference.
Farmer-Rick
(11,030 posts)"Breast cancer risk appears to be higher with daily progesterone (continuous combination HRT) than with less frequent progesterone (sequential or cyclical combination HRT). This increase in risk applies to bioidentical and natural hormone products as well as synthetic hormones."
https://www.cwhwichita.com/blog/bioidentical-hormone-replacement-therapy-vs-traditional-hrt#:~:text=The%20major%20difference%20between%20BHRT,horses%20and%20other%20synthetic%20hormones.
There's a lot of data out there about the generic risk of HRT. So, decide for yourself if it's a good thing for you. But I wouldn't go into HRT even with Bioidentical hormones without considering all the side effects.
I'm a big organic supporter, so I understand how a more organic hormone could be better for you then animal and synthetic derived hormones. But there are known side effects for all of them and people should consider all the consequences.
JoseBalow
(4,628 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)JoseBalow
(4,628 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)Iggo
(48,140 posts)ShazzieB
(18,211 posts)I know it can feel a little odd in the case of someone like Jenner, who became famous for things she accomplished long before transitioning, especially when looking at a photo taken back then. But "Bruce" is Caitlyn Jenner's "dead name," and using dead names is a no-no. Even when referring to someone famous under their dead name.
Here's an article that talks about why names and pronouns are extremely important to trans, gender nonconforming, and nonbinary people: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-deadnaming-and-why-is-it-harmful-5188575
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)ShazzieB
(18,211 posts)But yes, i believe we should avoid using dead names when referring to someone pre-transition, even when it's someone famous. I wasn't 100% sure about this myself, so I did some googling before I posted because I didn't want to get it wrong.
As I said, I know it can feel awkward when talking about someone like Jenner who was world famous under her dead name. But everything I've read says that we should make an effort to avoid using dead names and pre-transition pronouns in all cases. Why? Because it's something we should get in the habit of doing automatically, instead of making exceptions for people like Jenner.
A thing only feels awkward until we get used to it. I believe that this is something we all need to get used to.
I know that no disrespect has been meant to anyone here, by myself or anyone else, and that there has been no intention to make anyone uncomfortable. As someone who aspires to be a good (or at least halfway decent) ally to the LBGTQIA+ community, I'm always going to prioritize what makes trans people feel most comfortable over what makes cis people feel most comfortable. You are of course welcome to believe and/or prioritize differently.
JoseBalow
(4,628 posts)Is there a before and after protocol to pronouns and names? Like that was Bruce then, and this is Caitlyn now? Or should she always be referred to as Caitlyn, regardless? Is it an individual choice, or is there like a default rule to follow?
I wouldn't want to inadvertently offend anyone
ShazzieB
(18,211 posts)From what I, a cishet outsider, have been able to glean from my research, we can never go wrong by avoiding the use of dead names, so I feel most comfortable following that principle.
I don't think referring to the person who won the olympic decathlon gold medal as "Bruce" is heinously terrible. I just think avoiding the use of dead names is a habit we should all try to get into.
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)ShazzieB
(18,211 posts)They are a valuable part of our community, and I'm always interested in what they have to say.
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)😅
Poiuyt
(18,230 posts)We had some guy at work going that it was a real show, but that he missed it.
JoseBalow
(4,628 posts)
Howard Cosell & Dick Cavett present SCTVs Battle of the PBS Network stars. Watch as William F. Buckleys and Carl Sagans teams battle it out in this epic display of physical prowess and strength.
Iggo
(48,140 posts)JoseBalow
(4,628 posts)Iggo
(48,140 posts)RIP, kiddo.
Thanks for the laughs.
GreenWave
(8,688 posts)oregonjen
(3,454 posts)to John Ritters. They treated her horribly for fighting for equal pay.
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,609 posts)She might have deserved a raise, but expecting equal pay to the star was ludicrous and cost her the job.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)So sad.
I loved this show. These 3 + Mr. & Mrs. Roper and the Handyman. Sad to hear this.
The shows back then look so innocent now, Barney Miller, Marcus Welby MD, 8 is Enough, Love Boat
the most on edge show that I remember and loved was Soap.
Berts snapping his fingers disappearing act, Benson, Billy Crystal and the dummy w/ no filter, Mrs. Tate, crazy general grandpa every character just hit it out of the park on that show. You tube has some episodes and its still funny AF.
Quanto Magnus
(990 posts)iluvtennis
(20,571 posts)RandySF
(67,990 posts)And who could forget this?
Nixie
(17,339 posts)She had a very interesting story. edit: Her book "Keeping Secrets" was about her alcoholic father.
I swear I saw her driving headed to Palm Springs one day! I saw a bleach blonde in a white Mercedes speeding by and it looked just like her.
FelineOverlord
(3,734 posts)https://www.tmz.com/watch/0-p2s8h2e7/
Suzanne Somers praises Trump: Im happy about him
https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/370123-suzanne-somers-praises-trump-im-happy-about-him/
Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)Demovictory9
(33,345 posts)UTUSN
(72,052 posts)The bell tolls for all and any, ideology aside.
Some of her friends, in the link:
* Monica CROWLEY
* Megyn KELLY
* Tammy BRUCE
* Adam CAROLLA
********QUOTE******
https://deadline.com/2023/10/suzanne-somers-reactions-to-death-by-friends-1235574321/
*******UNQUOTE*****
MorbidButterflyTat
(2,545 posts)was an infomercial hawking some skin product. She said her stuff was better than petroleum jelly because people get petroleum jelly from the gas station.
Not a fan of that show or her.