Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davidswanson

(2,632 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 04:35 PM Jan 2012

Constitutional Amendment to Create Public Financing Introduced by Kucinich

I recently recommened a comprehensive Constitutional amendment addressing the corruption of our elections.

http://davidswanson.org/node/3537

The largest piece of it, largely inspired by an amendment drafted by Russell Simmons, had not been introduced in Congress . . . until now.

Congressman Dennis Kucinich has just introduced HJRes100 which proposes this Constitutional Amendment:

Section 1. All campaigns for President and Members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate shall be financed entirely with public funds. No contributions shall be permitted to any candidate for Federal office from any other source, including the candidate.

Section 2. No expenditures shall be permitted in support of any candidate for Federal office, or in opposition to any candidate for Federal office, from any other source, including the candidate. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.

Section 3. The Congress shall, by statute, provide limitations on the amounts and timing of the expenditures of such public funds.

Section 4. The Congress shall, by statute, provide criminal penalties for any violation of this Article.

Section 5. The Congress shall have the power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

This does not state that corporations are not people or bribery is not speech or the moon is not made of cheese, but it proceeds accordingly and handles the corruption of our elections as effectively as anything I've seen. No amendment is completely comprehensive, but no completely comprehensive amendment is likely to get passed (or even read). I also doubt very much that Congress will ever advance any such amendment, at least until there is a serious threat from two-thirds of the states to circumvent Congress with a Constitutional Convention.

But if there is an amendment to build the list of cosponsors on, this looks like the one. This looks to me like something that the anti-corporate-personhood movement, the clean elections movement, the peace movement, and every other cause for peace, justice, or representative government should get behind. I don't mean get behind a politician or a party or censor your own complete demands. I mean get every possible Congress member to cosponsor this bill, which exists because of our movement.

Blocking funding without providing public financing is a half-solution. Limiting private election spending while leaving loopholes is no solution. Prohibiting private spending, creating public financing, and making those laws enforceable is a huge chunk of the solution.

We can all remember "H J Res 100". Now to ask our misrepresentatives to sign on!

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Constitutional Amendment to Create Public Financing Introduced by Kucinich (Original Post) davidswanson Jan 2012 OP
I support this amendment. Warren Stupidity Jan 2012 #1
How many such amendments are there now? nt julian09 Jan 2012 #2
none like this one davidswanson Jan 2012 #3
Thanks, once again, Rep Kucinich. nt Zorra Jan 2012 #4
Oh, goody. Another Constitutional Amendment to violate. T S Justly Jan 2012 #5
As much as I admire Kucinich's efforts, I'm inclined to agree. white_wolf Jan 2012 #7
Kick Kaleko Jan 2012 #6
 

T S Justly

(884 posts)
5. Oh, goody. Another Constitutional Amendment to violate.
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 07:03 PM
Jan 2012

Ought to fit right in with the Bill Of Rights. Is that still with us? Sorry, but, Constitutional remedies
seem very quaint these days.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
7. As much as I admire Kucinich's efforts, I'm inclined to agree.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 03:30 AM
Jan 2012

We don't even follow the Constitution we have now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Constitutional Amendment ...