Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:10 PM Jan 2012

Court orders Vancouver newspapers to give police 5,481 photos from Stanley Cup riot night

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Vancouver+Province+release+Stanley+riot+images+before+police+handover/6021323/story.html

The Vancouver Sun and The Province will hand over all photos and video shot during the Stanley Cup riot to Vancouver police after a judge granted a police application, but the newspapers have decided to make every image available to our readers first.

Some 5,481 photos taken during the riot can now be viewed on The Sun’s website at pngphoto.com. These same images will be given to police on Monday as ordered by the court.

“We will reluctantly turn over the photos and videos to police, but remain concerned that the production order turns journalists into evidence gatherers for police,” said Harold Munro, The Sun’s deputy managing editor.

... The Sun is also concerned that Vancouver police will have a large database that includes hundreds of photos of innocent people.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court orders Vancouver newspapers to give police 5,481 photos from Stanley Cup riot night (Original Post) Newsjock Jan 2012 OP
That's the way it is. Cameras are the new "weapons". virgogal Jan 2012 #1
Good, this is one of the more important areas where public video and photos Lionessa Jan 2012 #2
 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
2. Good, this is one of the more important areas where public video and photos
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:25 PM
Jan 2012

are good to have around. The idea that they should only catch police misconduct is not one I embrace; I think public video of people in public is a good thing. I don't think state or federal nanny cams are though like at red lights and such, where it's mainly for monitoring childish behavior for making fines. If they were in accident prone intersections and only used to verify accident fault and such, I'd have no problem with them either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court orders Vancouver ne...