Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 1077 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (26)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time Magazine cover (Original Post)
ancianita
Jul 23
OP
I hear ya. But emphasis is on the whole new candidate. Joe is humble enough to appreciate the cover's message.
ancianita
Jul 23
#2
THANKS. I checked the date which seem too far into the future, so you're probably right. I'll check and remove.
ancianita
Jul 23
#7
Time is now once every two weeks, so date may be good, and sl8 says it is on their site. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 23
#10
MustLoveBeagles
(12,296 posts)1. They should've shown Joe
Otherwise it's perfect
ancianita
(37,656 posts)2. I hear ya. But emphasis is on the whole new candidate. Joe is humble enough to appreciate the cover's message.
MustLoveBeagles
(12,296 posts)5. You're right
lame54
(36,329 posts)4. At least they didn't put him in a walker
MustLoveBeagles
(12,296 posts)6. There's that
Bernardo de La Paz
(50,275 posts)3. Dunno, but this is said to be a fake. No UPC on it, for one. . . . nt
ancianita
(37,656 posts)7. THANKS. I checked the date which seem too far into the future, so you're probably right. I'll check and remove.
Bernardo de La Paz
(50,275 posts)8. Leave it. It is nice. Just put a caution on it. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
(50,275 posts)10. Time is now once every two weeks, so date may be good, and sl8 says it is on their site. . . . nt
sl8
(16,136 posts)9. Time shows it on their site:
Time shows it here:
https://time.com/7001028/why-joe-biden-stepped-down/
Also this tweet, assuming that's actually Time magazine's account:
Link to tweet
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #3)
ancianita This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bernardo de La Paz
(50,275 posts)12. Check sl8's post first. . . nt
ancianita
(37,656 posts)13. Yep. I'ma keep it. Thanks for the heads up ... best to use caution re sites like X in the next 105 days.