Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahina

(17,609 posts)
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:14 PM Jan 2012

Don't kid yourself. Citizens United means this election is unlike anything we've seen before.

No matter how easy it looks like Newt, Mittens, and Santorum would make this in any prior election, don't believe it.

We are going to be blasted with a wall of money on every tv, radio, website, msm venue 24-7 and if you think it isn't
likely to prevail, I disagree.

This is going to be a fight and a half, no joke.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't kid yourself. Citizens United means this election is unlike anything we've seen before. (Original Post) mahina Jan 2012 OP
I am predicting that pols from both parties will beg to reverse CU. immoderate Jan 2012 #1
The actual facts seem to indicate that plastering the media with ads does more harm Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #2
Or Linda McMahon in CT (nt) bigwillq Jan 2012 #3
There are many social sciences theories in play, mahina Jan 2012 #5
maybe the gop primary ad war tsunami will magical thyme Jan 2012 #4
 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
1. I am predicting that pols from both parties will beg to reverse CU.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:25 PM
Jan 2012

Playing politics under CU is like playing in traffic blindfolded.

--imm

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
2. The actual facts seem to indicate that plastering the media with ads does more harm
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:50 PM
Jan 2012

than good. Endless cash did not help Meg Whitman nor Fiorino in CA, and they spent and out spent like mad.
Think it through. If all it took to sell a product was lots of ads, no product would fail. Is it true that all films that get pushed with huge marketing make lots of of money? Nope. Do people who hate eggs suddenly like them if there are enough egg ads? Nope.
Fact is, too much marketing is as harmful as too little. This theory that candidates with the most money always win is false, and so is the theory that lots of ads means sure success for a product or person.

mahina

(17,609 posts)
5. There are many social sciences theories in play,
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:06 PM
Jan 2012

but I think you are talking about psychological reactance. I might be misunderstanding.

If you mean that advertising is not effective, I wish I agreed. How useful depends on the message and the reciever, but it should not be dismissed so lightly.

Good point about Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman though!

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
4. maybe the gop primary ad war tsunami will
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jan 2012

jump start the economy. Spend your money on your circular firing squad, assholes. Spend Billions and Billions on ads taking each other out. Make the agencies -- and their creative workers -- rich. Obama will face a swiss cheese candidate pre-decimated by ads.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't kid yourself. Citiz...