Given an inch, they will bring institutional feticide.

[WingDinger]

All the talk now about doing away with Roe vs. wade, is by per state. The effects, are not obvious. What would be the outcome of some states allowing abortion, and others outlawing it?

Those states that would outlaw it, are red states. Many of those states are filled with white majorities, and they are scared of the loss of white hegemony.

Thus, official, and unofficial signals of unwelcomeness, will see minorities fleeing to blue states for reasonable living standards.

So, women in red states, white majority, will carry all fetuses to term. Those in blue states, will do as their consciences and ability to support will allow.

This strategy, unlike outlawing all abortion, addresses the demographic shift so feared by provincial whites.

This could play out as overt, or even subliminally.

Before anyone poo poo's this hypothesis, witness the racial aggitation throughout europe. Add to this, the declining vitality of the American prerogatives. Provincial folks are truly frightened enough to do almost anything. War is welcome almost, strictly on it's stimulative merits.

Add to this, the difficulty of fighting this exact trend with logic. how would we even address it? Political correctness would stifle that debate.

The only method is to fight all moves anywhere, to even make abortion slightly less available. To even mention the demographic aspects, will see those whites branded as race traitors, and minorities, as revealing thier hands at attempting political takeover.

Allowing a Republican in the white house, whether by votes, or scam, holds dark outcomes yet unimaginable.

Lets roll.

[kestrel91316]

1. So you are proposing that Democrats should enact legislation that prohibits

certain Americans from relocating from one state to another??

Um, ok.

[WingDinger]

2. No, I'm proposing fighting state by state abortion ban, as vociferously as outright ban.

[Mz Pip]

3. Isn't that the case already?

Access to abortion in NY and CA is fairly easy. Alabama, Kansas and Mississippi, not so much.

It's already happening even though Roe v Wade is still in place. Although I'm sure the anti-choice crowd would like nothing better than to overturn Roe they can achieve pretty much the same results by shutting down clinics.

BUt I don't think race has anything to do with it really. It's more about patriarchy and control over women IMHO.

[WingDinger]

4. Indeed, the underpinnings are already in process.

Last edited Sat Jan 21, 2012, 01:18 PM - Edit history (2)

This is why the right is fighting now to brand liberals, and minorities, as the racists.

[WingDinger]

5. Here is one of those provincial fools.

People who recieve food stamps and public housing should be sterilized. If you can't make it without help you shouldn't have children and if you allready have children you should not have more.

Think about the level of failure required to be an able bodied adult and not be able to make it in the easiest place and time there has been to live in the entire history of mankind. So sad.....

More of his ravings.

Really? Should people who are HUMAN FAILURES reproduce and ruin the lives of children?

Don't have the baby if you can't feed the baby.


Why should violent, corrupt people be raising children? Why would we want to increase the number of children in our country with convicted felons as parents?

Do you think children raised by felons is a good thing? The felone MADE the decision to break the law. If they don't want the concsequences or are too stupid to understand them they definately should not have the important role of raising children.

I could say the same about your post. Wow, just wow!

[WingDinger]

6. And another.

This may be good, liberals don't like kids and murder thiers by the millions... This may help decrease thier numbers.