Early exit polls show that most important quality voters were looking for, who could beat

[cal04]

Last edited Sat Jan 21, 2012, 07:51 PM - Edit history (1)

CNN:Early exit polls show that most important quality voters were looking for was someone who could beat Obama.

http://www.cnn.com/

I'm not exactly sure what this comment was for, but Josh Marshall's comment:
Someone tell folks at White House to shut windows if thyre going to b laffing that hard. We're trying to hear TV here in NYC.

https://twitter.com/joshtpm

[onehandle]

1. Good news for Huntsman!

Oh, wait...

[OKNancy]

2. do they really think Newt is the best choice?

ol' punkin' head doesn't stand a chance.

[FarLeftFist]

3. Because they have no solutions/ideas, nor do they even want to govern, they just want POWER.

[Quantess]

4. We wanted someone who could beat W in 2004.

I sort of understand.

[hobbit709]

9. If the machines were honest, Kerry would have won.

That's what still worries me now. Too many election officials are R's.

[edhopper]

5. his wife...

bezeenga!

[russspeakeasy]

6. The repucks would run charlie manson if they thought he could beat Obama.

[zbdent]

10. and the media narrative would be focusing on

Manson not actually doing any hands-on killing of Sharon Tate ... that the "liberally-biased media" was forcing the connection between the killers and Manson, and how it's all "heresay" ...

[russspeakeasy]

13. Excellent.

[gateley]

7. They have consistently hammered that home -- Beat Obama. They do their programming well.

I heard a SC RNC guy on with Chuck Todd earlier, and I can't tell you how many times he repeated it.

[onenote]

8. And South Carolina repubs are undoubtedly the best judges of that.

[otohara]

11. They want Newt to put Obama in his place

Last edited Sat Jan 21, 2012, 08:53 PM - Edit history (1)

just like he did with Juan Williams and John King.

They want blood.

[JoePhilly]

12. Headline ... "SC GOP hates Obama more than they love Family Values!"