Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babsbunny

(8,441 posts)
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:44 PM Jan 2012

Scalia: Don’t like super-PAC ads? Turn off the TV.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/205583-scalia-dont-like-super-pac-ads-turn-off-the-tv

By Jeremy Herb - 01/21/12 06:21 PM ET

On the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which said that corporations and unions could spend an unlimited amount on political speech, Justice Antonin Scalia gave a simple solution to those who don’t like result: turn off the TV.

Speaking during a presentation before the South Carolina Bar Saturday in Columbia, S.C., Scalia said he has no problem with the rise of the super-PAC ads that have glutted the state’s airwaves ahead of the primary there, according to the Associated Press.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scalia: Don’t like super-PAC ads? Turn off the TV. (Original Post) babsbunny Jan 2012 OP
I think a lot of us will do exactly that Warpy Jan 2012 #1
Don't like polluted air? Stop breathing. Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #2
Not really. You don't have to watch TV to survive. former9thward Jan 2012 #3
Of course, when Arizona passed a law that would provide MORE money to candidates that were attacked, BzaDem Jan 2012 #4
We are paying for entertainment EC Jan 2012 #5
That is no judge. That is a partisan hack. applegrove Jan 2012 #6
what an arrogant prick. spanone Jan 2012 #7
Disingenuous bullshit muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #8

Warpy

(111,243 posts)
1. I think a lot of us will do exactly that
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:47 PM
Jan 2012

If TCM and FMC are showing shite and Link has talking heads I'm not particularly interested in and PBS is fundraising, you had better believe the TV will be off or playing a DVD and I'll be listening to loud music and getting something productive done for a change.

This coming campaign season might be just what I need to get rid of the box completely.

Then again, when it's all over, Science and National Geo and Ovation and the Documentary Channel will be back to normal and not shoveling shit out of the screen and into my face.

However, they will be off the first time I see a super PAC ad.

BzaDem

(11,142 posts)
4. Of course, when Arizona passed a law that would provide MORE money to candidates that were attacked,
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:52 PM
Jan 2012

to facilitate a response (which would be more speech), he struck that law down. (Arizona vs. Free Enterprise Fund)

Apparently, to Scalia, more speech is always good when it increases disparities in the electoral context. But when it decreases disparities in the electoral context, it is unconstitutional.

EC

(12,287 posts)
5. We are paying for entertainment
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 11:08 PM
Jan 2012

at a pretty damn high price, so no, I'm not turning off my TV. If the bombardment doesn't cool down I'll complain everyday to the cable company and hope others do to. Maybe on the cable stations they could limit the number of political ads?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
8. Disingenuous bullshit
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:41 AM
Jan 2012

He knows very well people aren't complaining about the amount of ads they get on their own TV; they're complaining about the influence the unlimited money has on the perceptions of the population as a whole, normally because of high TV ad spending, but by no means limited to that. We can't turn off everyone's TV for them, because you stopped us, Scalia.

What's so sad is to see a judge who is supposed to be wise and neutral feels free to spout political bullshit like this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scalia: Don’t like super-...