Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
4. Not really, no...
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:00 PM
Jan 2012

The issue with Newt's Tiffany account wasn't that it was so large, it's that it's an interest-free account--leading to quid pro quo issues because, among other things, Newt knows people who could write preferential treatment for precious metals held for manufacturing purposes (remember, Tiffany is a manufacturer of items made from precious metals) into the tax code.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
11. Except Newt has been out of office for a long time
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:34 AM
Jan 2012

I would wonder if this wasn't - in essence - a discount given to him because of his large purchases there. Interest rates have been low, so if you try to estimate what the real cost to Tiffany might be less than offering a 5% discount.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
14. You might want to look at Newtie's Wikipedia page
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 02:40 AM
Jan 2012

He is a member of all the top conservative think tanks. If you were to go to any of them and ask, "what is the most certain way to stimulate growth in America?" they would all tell you to cut the capital gains tax rate or eliminate it altogether.

Oh, trust me: there are people who spend more at Tiffany than Newt Gingrich does, and they don't get interest-free charge accounts.

Missy Vixen

(16,207 posts)
12. It was also unsecured credit
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 11:27 AM
Jan 2012

Tiffany is a public company. It's hard for me to believe that million dollar credit lines are routinely awarded, especially with Gingrich's financial history.

We might also muse on the fact that the million dollar credit line was ten percent of Gingrich's entire financial worth, allegedly.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
5. Because he's tearing down a mansion in La Jolla to build a bigger mansion.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jan 2012

That would make for a fun exchange between the two.

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
6. Anybody else notice Callista Gingrich wasn't wearing jewelry yesterday?
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:17 PM
Jan 2012

Strange for a woman married to a guy with a mega-credit line at Tiffany's.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
7. That's the lifestyle he is defending
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:20 PM
Jan 2012

If he attacks it he'll get called out for being a hypocrite. Santorum might be able to get away with it. That attack transfers to Romney, so he probably won't. Santorum is in a position to sit back and let them forget all about him while they attack each other.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
8. +1, nailed it.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:52 AM
Jan 2012

Gingrich and Romney on the attack, destroying each other. All Santorum needs to do is kick back and stay in the race to become the nominee.

Still, he's not going to win it. He looks like a wealking - not mean, not very smart and not incredibly manly. Just not going to happen.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
9. Because there is no real scandal there and there are so many real things for Rommney to attack on
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:28 AM
Jan 2012

Gingrich is trying to claim that the ethics investigation found nothing and that it was just political - Romney is making sure people know that he was kicked out over it.

Attacking NG for the Tiffany line of credit is something the ultra-wealthy Romney could not do without it backfiring.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why won't Mitt attack Gin...