Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:29 PM Jan 2012

Aren't the members of Congress protected by the constitution from

arrest or detainment while going to or from Congress?

I think the TSA may be on thin ice if they interfere with members of Congress. Any legally eagles think I'm pointed in the right direction.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aren't the members of Congress protected by the constitution from (Original Post) CK_John Jan 2012 OP
Yes, but he wasn't going to Congress. TheWraith Jan 2012 #1
Isn't Congress still in recess? I also thought he was going to a march, not to work. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #2
Arrest maybe but I don't think there is anything about detainment or searches. Bandit Jan 2012 #3
he was traveling to a "function" pkz Jan 2012 #4
Love the way they always talk about "Liberty" atreides1 Jan 2012 #8
The veracity of his "detention" Lawlbringer Jan 2012 #5
He wasn't detained, just not allowed to proceed to his flight ashling Jan 2012 #9
From dictionary.com hugo_from_TN Jan 2012 #10
Do you think that the TSA refers to dictionary.com? ashling Jan 2012 #11
He wasn't detained. Ian David Jan 2012 #6
He was going to DC and would be covered. former9thward Jan 2012 #7

pkz

(719 posts)
4. he was traveling to a "function"
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:32 PM
Jan 2012

“Today I’ll speak to the March for Life in DC. A nation cannot long endure w/o respect for the right to Life. Our Liberty depends on it,” tweeted Rand Paul at 9:49 A.M.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71818.html#ixzz1kJcbJIDN

atreides1

(16,072 posts)
8. Love the way they always talk about "Liberty"
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:09 PM
Jan 2012

Especially when it involves the idea of taking away someone else's liberty...because they don't like it!

Lawlbringer

(550 posts)
5. The veracity of his "detention"
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:33 PM
Jan 2012

could be called into question.

Plus he wasn't detained or arrested. I mean, detained in the technical sense, he wasn't taken into custody. He took another flight later.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
9. He wasn't detained, just not allowed to proceed to his flight
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:39 PM
Jan 2012

If hes was allowed to leave, then he was not detained.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
11. Do you think that the TSA refers to dictionary.com?
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 01:37 AM
Jan 2012

seriously, detention in legal terms refers to mobility - not forward or sideways or backward, but full detention.
If the TSA said (and somebody should, they REALLY should)
"SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP! AND DON"T MOVE!"
that would have been detention.

former9thward

(31,973 posts)
7. He was going to DC and would be covered.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jan 2012

The fact that he was going to a march first is irrelevant and would not stand up in any court. The question would be when effectively does a detention become an arrest. Some of the people at Gitmo may have an opinion about that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Aren't the members of Con...