General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAren't the members of Congress protected by the constitution from
arrest or detainment while going to or from Congress?
I think the TSA may be on thin ice if they interfere with members of Congress. Any legally eagles think I'm pointed in the right direction.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Also, being delayed in airport security is not "arrest."
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)pkz
(719 posts)Today Ill speak to the March for Life in DC. A nation cannot long endure w/o respect for the right to Life. Our Liberty depends on it, tweeted Rand Paul at 9:49 A.M.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71818.html#ixzz1kJcbJIDN
atreides1
(16,072 posts)Especially when it involves the idea of taking away someone else's liberty...because they don't like it!
Lawlbringer
(550 posts)could be called into question.
Plus he wasn't detained or arrested. I mean, detained in the technical sense, he wasn't taken into custody. He took another flight later.
ashling
(25,771 posts)If hes was allowed to leave, then he was not detained.
hugo_from_TN
(1,069 posts)1. to keep from proceeding; keep waiting; delay.
ashling
(25,771 posts)seriously, detention in legal terms refers to mobility - not forward or sideways or backward, but full detention.
If the TSA said (and somebody should, they REALLY should)
"SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP! AND DON"T MOVE!"
that would have been detention.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)former9thward
(31,973 posts)The fact that he was going to a march first is irrelevant and would not stand up in any court. The question would be when effectively does a detention become an arrest. Some of the people at Gitmo may have an opinion about that.