Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MinervaX

(169 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:04 PM Jan 2012

No, the U.S. is not leaving Iraq

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/

Thousands of armed U.S. private contractors will be based in the country, and the potential for violence is real
By Justin Elliott

*
*

In a speech at Fort Bragg, N.C., Wednesday, President Obama declared that the war in Iraq is over.

“I’ve come to speak to you about the end of the war in Iraq,” he told gathered troops. “Over the last few months, the final work of leaving Iraq has been done. Dozens of bases with American names that housed thousands of American troops have been closed down or turned over to the Iraqis. Thousands of tons of equipment have been packed up and shipped out. Tomorrow, the colors of United States Forces-Iraq — the colors you fought under — will be formally cased in a ceremony in Baghdad.”

All the specifics were true. But what about Obama’s claim that the war has come to a end?

The truth is more complicated. It turns out the Obama administration is leaving behind a huge contingent from the State Department along with thousands of armed private contractors. The possibility for violence between Americans and Iraqis is very real.
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, the U.S. is not leaving Iraq (Original Post) MinervaX Jan 2012 OP
..... ingac70 Jan 2012 #1
Interesting article. Hundreds of contractors have been detained. morningfog Jan 2012 #19
Sorry for the shit stirrers, but we already have. TheWraith Jan 2012 #2
The face of the war has just changed Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #4
But we "won" though, right? truebrit71 Jan 2012 #6
that would be a big ..... NO Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #9
The War is Over, We Won, Bush was Brilliant for Invading.. mdmc Jan 2012 #7
Edited to add a source. morningfog Jan 2012 #10
but the occupation has merely entered another phase... mike_c Jan 2012 #16
Armed Private Contractors???? lamp_shade Jan 2012 #3
Security guards and body guards. ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #28
But ProSense Jan 2012 #5
I remember that speech MinervaX Jan 2012 #12
Is that true there are less than 10,000 contractors? That is great news. morningfog Jan 2012 #13
Tax payers dollars - just covered up a little bit. Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #8
And another manufactured outrage widget hits the shop floor. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #11
Yeah because all of those deaths and the emptying of the US Treasury is just so fucking... truebrit71 Jan 2012 #14
Call a Bush supporter with that nonsense. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #15
Yeah, we "won" and we have left Iraq a better place... truebrit71 Jan 2012 #17
When did I say "we won"? JoePhilly Jan 2012 #20
As far as I can see it is out of the frying pan into the fire. Mercanaries are more dangerous to jwirr Jan 2012 #18
How is this not the war being over? SpartanDem Jan 2012 #21
I read on DU that Bradley Manning ended the war. Scurrilous Jan 2012 #22
LOL NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #24
Thanks for the month old article that was has previously been posted here several times onenote Jan 2012 #23
MinervaX has been here for 2 weeks. progressoid Jan 2012 #26
Then the possibilities for posting old material are just about endless onenote Jan 2012 #27
Welcome to DU NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #25
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
19. Interesting article. Hundreds of contractors have been detained.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:05 PM
Jan 2012

I am curious on the actual number of armed contractors still left, but it is a good sign, in my opinion, that Iraq is exerting control over the situation through denials of renewals to carry weapons and arrests.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
2. Sorry for the shit stirrers, but we already have.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:09 PM
Jan 2012

Trying to create imaginary contractor armies doesn't change the fact that the war is over.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
4. The face of the war has just changed
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:14 PM
Jan 2012

We have an embassy that is 1.5 miles square
and we left the country in worse shape than when we got there

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
6. But we "won" though, right?
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:17 PM
Jan 2012

...what was that someone once said about putting lipstick on a pig..???

mdmc

(29,065 posts)
7. The War is Over, We Won, Bush was Brilliant for Invading..
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:21 PM
Jan 2012

I opposed the war because I didn't think getting rid of WMD (aka nerve gas) was worth 50 years of blood and sacrifice.

Ten years later we have a stable, secular, pro west, unified Iraq. I guess I was wrong to oppose Bush. He was playing multi dimensional chess like a champ, not a chump..

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
10. Edited to add a source.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:26 PM
Jan 2012

In my original post, I asked if you knew how many contractors were still in Iraq and what operations they were conducting.

Here is a report from March 2011 that shows the contractor numbers have been steadily dropping, which is positive. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40764.pdf

As of March 2011, there were still 64,000 contractors in Iraq, of which around 18,000 were US. I am sure that number is much lower. In this thread a poster said the numbers were now under 10,000.

Also in the report, the majority (61%) were base support, which undoubtedly has lessened. 18% were security and 1% were training.

I am interested in seeing updated numbers.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
16. but the occupation has merely entered another phase...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:52 PM
Jan 2012

...with a less familiar face. Arguably, the "war" ended when it became clear that further hostilities against the occupying force were futile except as a way to express anger. At that point it became a garrison occupation. Now the garrisons have been replaced with foreign service officers, "security consultants," and "embassy staff." But no one is under any illusions about the occupation being ended. That will happen when Iraqis have no need to fear retribution from Americans, their proxies, or their drones.

There's another dimension to this that rarely gets mentioned. It took three years for Obama to end a war that was started on false pretenses and should never have happened. The war itself was a war of aggression, and thus an international crime under the U.N. Charter. Again, we can spin arguments about the details all day long, but the war should never have happened and it shocks me that a U.S. president apparently cannot remedy a mistake of that magnitude in less time than three years. It's like telling a bank robber to wind it up sometime in the next month or two, or else! If the will to do the right thing rather than the maximally politically expedient thing had existed in the White House, we could have ended the war against Irag (and Afghanistan) within weeks, rather than years, and could have begun an orderly stand down immediately upon Obama taking command. He PROLONGED the wars unnecessarily. That is absolutely unforgivable.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. But
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:17 PM
Jan 2012

"In a speech at Fort Bragg, N.C., Wednesday, President Obama declared that the war in Iraq is over." (when?)

...Bush ended it! But the Iraqis ended it! But Obama doesn't deserve credit! But contractors!

Did you know that there were more than 130,000 contractors in Iraq in January 2009 and now there are less than 10,000, and dropping?


http://www.whitehouse.gov/iraq


 

MinervaX

(169 posts)
12. I remember that speech
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:28 PM
Jan 2012

It's the one where Obama praises George W. Bush the war criminal.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/01/maddow-outraged-obamas-kind-words-bush-iraq-speech/

“I think we shouldn’t get past how remarkable it is how much the proponents of the Iraq war are getting off easy here,” Maddow said to MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann immediately following the speech.

“And to to have in this speech, as combat operations are ending, to have, as you point out Keith, the president not only not addressing the circumstances in which he we went to war, but these kind words for President Bush, describing his commitment to our security, despite the recklessness with which President Bush discarded that national security in favor of this war of choice, which only diminished our security, and is responsible probably for the Afghanistan war still going on today, for the depths of people who have died in Afghanistan after the time, after which that war would have ended had we not gone to Iraq, not to mention all of the people who died in Iraq,” Maddow continued.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
13. Is that true there are less than 10,000 contractors? That is great news.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:29 PM
Jan 2012

Last I had seen it was much higher. Do you have a link on the contractor levels?

I agree that for all intents and purposes the war in Iraq is over.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
14. Yeah because all of those deaths and the emptying of the US Treasury is just so fucking...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:39 PM
Jan 2012
right?

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
15. Call a Bush supporter with that nonsense.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:42 PM
Jan 2012

Obama pulled our troops out of Iraq.

But hey ... maybe you can start a business dedicated to moving goal posts from one location to another.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
17. Yeah, we "won" and we have left Iraq a better place...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:01 PM
Jan 2012

...Sorry but I ain't buyin' your happy sauce...

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
20. When did I say "we won"?
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jan 2012

I said its over. And it is. Our troops are out.

Sorry that truth pisses you off.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
18. As far as I can see it is out of the frying pan into the fire. Mercanaries are more dangerous to
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:01 PM
Jan 2012

this world than armies who can be controlled if TPTB have the balls.

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
21. How is this not the war being over?
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:14 PM
Jan 2012
The contract is for diplomatic protection. You’re not supposed to see Triple Canopy employees, say, go out on raids. Fifty-six days before the U.S. withdrawal, the State Department also put out a contract for aviation support. That’s an indicator of how this is being put together on the fly. It’s also an indication that the State Department is contracting for missions as sensitive as Medevac or close air support.


The contractors are for security of our embassy, consulates and the State Dept. employees. Is it still as very dangerous situation, of course, but it's not active combat.

onenote

(42,685 posts)
23. Thanks for the month old article that was has previously been posted here several times
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:22 PM
Jan 2012

I suppose if one wanted to, one could fill up DU just reposting old stories.

onenote

(42,685 posts)
27. Then the possibilities for posting old material are just about endless
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:19 PM
Jan 2012

Maybe its just me but I don't recall a lot of new DUers posting old articles.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, the U.S. is not leavi...