To the piece of shit on CNN concerned about if we are getting all of Hillary Clinton's

[RB TexLa]

medical information or not. You have NO right to know any of another person's medical information. That has even been codified into law! It doesn't matter if it's Hillary Smith or Hillary Clinton.

She doesn't even have to provide personal medical information to her husband and child, yet you are concerned about what information you are getting.

[TwilightGardener]

1. She's not an elected official, so it's not the public's concern. She's

a cabinet appointment. If she can't serve, she has replacements. There is no "need to know" on the part of the public. She could quit tomorrow and not reveal why, and it's none of our business.

[RB TexLa]

2. Wouldn't matter if she was an elected official

They still have the right to control their medical information.

[TwilightGardener]

4. They don't need to give private details in that case, but they are directly accountable

to their constituency and if they are unable to serve, they should say why. There's a long history of Presidents, for example, who have had secret debilitating illnesses in office--did the public have a right to know, if others (possibly unelected) had to step in and run things or make decisions?

[PCIntern]

3. Agreed 100%, but what did you honestly think Cable News would do

For viewership on a Federal Holiday?

[dballance]

5. The Fact is I Believe we ALREADY Know more Than We're Entitled to Know

We know she has a blood clot and where it is in her head. We know she's on blood thinners.

I think given the medical privacy laws (HIPPA) Clinton and her team have been generous with information.

[Skittles]

15. it is HIPAA

and that is true: Hillary no doubt released more info because she knows a lot of us care

[proud2BlibKansan]

6. This is just code speak for 'Clintons lie'

The right wingnuts are all over the internet claiming we have no reason to trust Bill or Hilary because Bill lied 15 years ago. And Hilary lied about White Water. so you know, she's lying now too.

If necessary -

[jwirr]

7. Plus her public life has ended when she stepped aside as SOS. She is a private citizen and we

have no rights to any information that the family does not want to give us. Some of these news commentators have no sense of decency.

[jillan]

8. Who said that??? We need to bombard their email box by letting them know how f-ed up this is.

[Liberal_Stalwart71]

9. No difference on MSNBC. Luke Russert and Andrea Mitchell are scum of the earth!

[TwilightGardener]

10. What are they saying? Are they insinuating that's there's

something more medically serious going on?

[Bombero1956]

11. wow

Have these idiots ever heard of HIPPA?

[Skittles]

16. it is HIPAA

and apparently it does not apply to public figures these bastards hate

[ananda]

12. Still waiting to see the Romneys tax returns!

Now that was important!

[cthulu2016]

13. She is high in the line of Presidential succession.

Her health is not entirely outside the sphere of legitimate public interest.

[RB TexLa]

14. She's a human being with rights. She never has to give anyone her medical information.