Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUpdate on the GOP mess in the House
The Senates New Years Eve compromise on the "fiscal cliff" hit major turbulence in the House on Tuesday, and the Republican majority is likely to try to amend the bill and send it back to the Senate, House Republicans said.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) told his conference he is flatly opposed to the Senate bill without more spending cuts, members said as they emerged from a nearly two-hour Republican meeting in the Capitol.According to sources in the room, Cantor said that he did not "support" the Senate-backed bill but stopped short of saying he would vote against it if the House took it up on the floor.
GOP leaders repeated "10 to 15 times" that they would only take up an amendment if 218 House Republicans will vote for the amendment.Democrats are all but certain to oppose any amendment to the Senate-passed bill and GOP leaders are not willing to take a chance that their own rank-and-file members would kill it.
Spokesmen for Boehner and Cantor issued an unusual joint statement after the meeting, saying there was universal concern among members about the Senate bill.
GOP leaders plan to reconvene the rank-and-file around 5 p.m. on Tuesday.Boehner told his conference that he was "shocked" that so many Senate Republicans voted for the bill, but he would not indicate how he felt personally about the direction the House should move in."He said he was not in favor of the Senate bill," Jones said of Cantor. "I think the Speaker was as open today as I have ever seen him to the will of what the conference wants."At this point, House GOP leaders are meeting to hammer out a way forward that could include taking the bill up as-is and letting it pass with primarily Democratic votes or amending it in some way that would garner at least 218 House GOP votes, Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) told The Hill.The general consensus among House GOP lawmakers, however, was that the Senate-passed bill spends too much and cuts too little.
Brent Bozell, a prominent conservative activist and fundraiser, said Tuesday the Republican Party would loose its "soul" if House lawmakers vote for Senate legislation raising taxes on the wealthy.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) told his conference he is flatly opposed to the Senate bill without more spending cuts, members said as they emerged from a nearly two-hour Republican meeting in the Capitol.According to sources in the room, Cantor said that he did not "support" the Senate-backed bill but stopped short of saying he would vote against it if the House took it up on the floor.
GOP leaders repeated "10 to 15 times" that they would only take up an amendment if 218 House Republicans will vote for the amendment.Democrats are all but certain to oppose any amendment to the Senate-passed bill and GOP leaders are not willing to take a chance that their own rank-and-file members would kill it.
Spokesmen for Boehner and Cantor issued an unusual joint statement after the meeting, saying there was universal concern among members about the Senate bill.
GOP leaders plan to reconvene the rank-and-file around 5 p.m. on Tuesday.Boehner told his conference that he was "shocked" that so many Senate Republicans voted for the bill, but he would not indicate how he felt personally about the direction the House should move in."He said he was not in favor of the Senate bill," Jones said of Cantor. "I think the Speaker was as open today as I have ever seen him to the will of what the conference wants."At this point, House GOP leaders are meeting to hammer out a way forward that could include taking the bill up as-is and letting it pass with primarily Democratic votes or amending it in some way that would garner at least 218 House GOP votes, Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) told The Hill.The general consensus among House GOP lawmakers, however, was that the Senate-passed bill spends too much and cuts too little.
Brent Bozell, a prominent conservative activist and fundraiser, said Tuesday the Republican Party would loose its "soul" if House lawmakers vote for Senate legislation raising taxes on the wealthy.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/275101-senate-fiscal-cliff-deal-in-trouble-in-house
What soul???
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1210 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update on the GOP mess in the House (Original Post)
octoberlib
Jan 2013
OP
As if the Republican Party has a soul... or any of it's members for that matter.
Motown_Johnny
Jan 2013
#1
'would loose its "soul" if House lawmakers vote for Senate legislation raising taxes on the wealthy'
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#3
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)1. As if the Republican Party has a soul... or any of it's members for that matter.
NashvilleLefty
(811 posts)2. By "soul" they mean $$$$$$. nt
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)3. 'would loose its "soul" if House lawmakers vote for Senate legislation raising taxes on the wealthy'
And if nothing gets agreed to, taxes on the wealthy go up even more.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)4. it would be ironic of the house republicans killed the deal and forced the best course
which is for all the tax rates to go up.