Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 09:27 PM Jan 2013

Gerrymandering , Gerrymandering , Gerrymandering

and Gerrymandering.
All those who think it will be a shoe in for the Dems to retake the House in 14. Remember the Dems already got more votes for Congress than the Repugs. And States like PA and MI, where there is a bigger GOP delegation to Congress, the Dems got more votes.
So until gerrymandering is addressed, the Congress is staying Red.

Don't get cocky, we kicked their ass in 08 and it didn't last.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gerrymandering , Gerrymandering , Gerrymandering (Original Post) edhopper Jan 2013 OP
The house is likely GOP until 2020. All thanks to gerrymandering. nt aaaaaa5a Jan 2013 #1
Never underestimate the power of the RWNJs to slit their own throats. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #2
Yep! I plan on researching this subject since I know very little about how it was accomplished. Sadiedog Jan 2013 #3
This interactive map edhopper Jan 2013 #4
Phew! Thanks for the link to the map! Sadiedog Jan 2013 #6
I tried to get peoples attention before the GOP abused the gerrymander after this last census. Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #5
I agree, I am sorry that I did not pay much attention to the subject myself! nt Sadiedog Jan 2013 #7
not sure what we could have done oldhippydude Jan 2013 #8
We have no one to blame but ourselves. Redfairen Jan 2013 #9
Progressives are part of the problem. Obama didn't get Single Payer, repeal DADT, eliminate bluestate10 Jan 2013 #10
The Democrats gerrymandered here in Maryland kwassa Jan 2013 #11
Totally agree.... Swede Atlanta Jan 2013 #12
Whenever redistricting happens in my state, Jenoch Jan 2013 #13
What you discribe edhopper Jan 2013 #15
Not really. It's more of a compromise put together by judges. Jenoch Jan 2013 #16
Yes really edhopper Jan 2013 #18
You need to rethink this. Jenoch Jan 2013 #19
Yeah, the courts edhopper Jan 2013 #21
So we know that repukes participate in gerrymandering... I wonder current districts OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #14
watch out for gerry and the mander-makers! farminator3000 Jan 2013 #17
Those assholes. This is my fucking district now. MadrasT Jan 2013 #20
 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
2. Never underestimate the power of the RWNJs to slit their own throats.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jan 2013

They handed us the Missouri and Indiana Senate seats on a silver platter by insuring the most RWNJ candidate possible was nominated in each race.

The long knives are already out to primary ALL of the current RWNJs with people even more extreme come 2014.

If we win the House back in 2014, it will be entirely due to the efforts of the teabaggers.

Sadiedog

(353 posts)
3. Yep! I plan on researching this subject since I know very little about how it was accomplished.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jan 2013

I certainly hope there is away to undo this as it is atrocious!

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
5. I tried to get peoples attention before the GOP abused the gerrymander after this last census.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jan 2013

Texas was once again a testing tool for the GOP's future plans. What they did to this state via gerrymandering in the previous decade was then implemented on other states after the 2010 census.

I think too few people actually understood what gerrymandering was, and how it was implemented, to understand the potential it had to skew a districts electorate from Dems to Republicans.

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
9. We have no one to blame but ourselves.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:05 PM
Jan 2013

We've allowed gerrymandering to happen. Progressives have watched it happen and not demanded change. Mobilizing to destroy this corruption has to be one of the great progressive causes between now and 2020. Redistricting reform has been successful in a handful of states. It just hasn't been tried in most of them. We have to get the ball rolling, and so far, we just haven't.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
10. Progressives are part of the problem. Obama didn't get Single Payer, repeal DADT, eliminate
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:17 PM
Jan 2013

Bush tax cuts during the first 18 months of his first Administration, so Progressives went bullshit and decided to make democrats "pay" in the 2010 midterms. The "pay" is what we have now, crazed republicans in control of the House and deeply entrenched in some key Blue states.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
11. The Democrats gerrymandered here in Maryland
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jan 2013

Took over a traditional Republican area of western Maryland with it, got another house seat out of it.

And had the district changes voted on, and accepted as a referendum during the general election.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
12. Totally agree....
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:34 PM
Jan 2013

We have to be patient and ensure we take back state houses and governor's mansions in time for re-districting after the 2020 census. Unfortunately that is 7 years away.

We may do well nationally but must realize that all politics is local and that is no more evident than in the re-districting that goes on every 10 years. Even in states that do not add or lose a congressional seat, re-districting to "respect the demographic changes of the past 10 years" occurs. If those making the decisions are pukes they will ensure they get the most out of the deal.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
13. Whenever redistricting happens in my state,
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:35 PM
Jan 2013

it always ends up in the courts and neither party is pleased with the outcome.

By the way, the fact that Democratic candidates got more total votes in the entire country than did all of the republican candidates is a fairly meaningless statistic. It's not a 'winner takes all' system. The democrats won by larger margins and thus got more total votes. That does not help the democratic candidates in republican leaning districts.

Did you ever notice flocks of geese as they migrate in the spring or the fall? They fly in a "V" pattern. Frequently, one side of the "V" is longer than the other side? Do you know why one side is longer? More geese.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
16. Not really. It's more of a compromise put together by judges.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jan 2013

Gerrymmandering is when one party sets the district's boundaries to their satisfaction and to the detriment of the opposing party.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
19. You need to rethink this.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 01:49 PM
Jan 2013

Gerrymandering is when district borders are manipulated to give one party an advantage over the other. When the birders are set by a panel of judges and both parties are pissed off, how is that gerrymandering? Don't get me wrong, attempts at gerrymandering are made by both parties. They both submit their plans but the last couple of times the legislature has been split so neither party has had enough power to get their way. They both file a lawsuit and the courts decide.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
14. So we know that repukes participate in gerrymandering... I wonder current districts
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jan 2013

democrats hold because of blue gerrymandering. Maybe dems are reluctant to raise the flag on it because a few of their own districts might get caught in an investigation.

So I'm curious as to how many dem districts are blue thanks to gerrymandering. (?) There must be at least few.

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
17. watch out for gerry and the mander-makers!
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 12:25 AM
Jan 2013

Republicans in Pennsylvania, however, took a state that is two or three points more Democratic than the country as a whole, and created 12 districts (out of 18) that are more Republican than the country as a whole. They did so by creating what can only be called a group of Rorschach-inkblot districts in southeastern Pennsylvania.

The net result is a map that shores up their vulnerable incumbents, and that may well result in a 14-4 Republican edge by the end of the decade.

To see how this works, take a look at the following two charts.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/12/14/in_pennsylvania_the_gerrymander_of_the_decade_112404.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gerrymandering , Gerryman...