Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mrs. Overall

(6,839 posts)
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:11 AM Jan 2013

Everything you've ever tweeted: The Library of Congress says it's amassed about 170 Billion Tweets

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Library of Congress says it's amassed about 170 billion tweets since it began collecting an archive of all Twitter messages in 2010.

Twitter is donating its archive to the library, going back to the first one posted in 2006.

Library Director of Communications Gayle Osterberg wrote in a blog post Friday that the volume of tweets it receives has grown from 140 million daily in February 2011 to nearly half a billion tweets each day in late 2012.

Librarians have been developing a system to preserve and organize the collection. Now the library is shifting its focus to handle the technical challenges of making such a massive archive available to researchers.

http://www.komonews.com/news/tech/Library-of-Congress-has-amassed-170-billion-tweets-185694722.html

I had no idea all tweets were being archived.



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everything you've ever tweeted: The Library of Congress says it's amassed about 170 Billion Tweets (Original Post) Mrs. Overall Jan 2013 OP
Now your inane bullshit can live forever, in the LoC Scootaloo Jan 2013 #1
"...the technical challenges of making such a massive archive available to researchers." Adsos Letter Jan 2013 #2
Yes! geomon666 Jan 2013 #3
Genealogy 100 years from now will be interesting. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jan 2013 #4
Finally! Jamastiene Jan 2013 #5
Very interesting intaglio Jan 2013 #6
kick for morning. Mrs. Overall Jan 2013 #7
why. i can understand keeping interesting stuff but most of it is inane loli phabay Jan 2013 #8
The Library of Congress HappyMe Jan 2013 #9
Cross-referenced, linked, and all tied back to Honey Boo Boo... Buns_of_Fire Jan 2013 #12
Unfortunately true. HappyMe Jan 2013 #13
I have never tweeted. In_The_Wind Jan 2013 #10
As the technical hurdles to storing information melt away, expect more of this. Robb Jan 2013 #11
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. Now your inane bullshit can live forever, in the LoC
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:15 AM
Jan 2013

I'll bet if tweeters had know, they would have worn clean underwear.

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
2. "...the technical challenges of making such a massive archive available to researchers."
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:36 AM
Jan 2013

One of the hurdles future historians will have to address; not a dearth of documentation, but an excess. Determining the significant will be a challenge, I would think.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,142 posts)
12. Cross-referenced, linked, and all tied back to Honey Boo Boo...
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 12:53 PM
Jan 2013

or the Kardashians, whichever seems appropriate for future historians. FSM only knows what they're going to think of us.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
13. Unfortunately true.
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:06 PM
Jan 2013

To say nothing of the inanity of the average person.
"i bought new shoes!"
"we 8 lunch!"



Robb

(39,665 posts)
11. As the technical hurdles to storing information melt away, expect more of this.
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jan 2013

"Save it all, we'll look through it later."

I suggested one time to a former boss that we go through and delete duplicate files on our server. He said he would spend more money paying anyone to do that than he would just buying more server space.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Everything you've ever tw...