Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be the first on your block to have one!!!! (Original Post) Playinghardball Jan 2013 OP
Hahaha! No thanks. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #1
You think this is funny? proud2BlibKansan Jan 2013 #2
Yes, I think spending $100 on a President Obama poster is funny. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #3
The Selling of the President Larrymoe Curlyshemp Jan 2013 #8
Thanks! nt ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #9
Very cool!!! Chuck Close is one of my favorites... reACTIONary Jan 2013 #4
If that's art, then I'm Pablo Effin Picasso. JohnnyRingo Jan 2013 #5
Please watch this video about Close's technique and process. Heidi Jan 2013 #6
I do understand more about his style now... JohnnyRingo Jan 2013 #12
I love photo realism, too. Heidi Jan 2013 #14
That is indeed impressive! JohnnyRingo Jan 2013 #15
I like Chuck Close catpuke9000 Jan 2013 #7
I like that image as well. JohnnyRingo Jan 2013 #10
There's this thing called Artprize where I live. catpuke9000 Jan 2013 #11
Better yet, take that $100, split in to two $50 bills and give them away. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #13

reACTIONary

(5,768 posts)
4. Very cool!!! Chuck Close is one of my favorites...
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 01:29 AM
Jan 2013

...a little too expensive for me, but a great portrait nonetheless!

I got to see Shepard Fairey's Hope portrait at Irivne Contemporary in DC just before it was purchased by the National Portrait Gallery.

http://www.npg.si.edu/collection/obamaportrait.html

http://irvinecontemporary.com/otherExhibitions.php?eventID=87

JohnnyRingo

(18,618 posts)
5. If that's art, then I'm Pablo Effin Picasso.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 01:35 AM
Jan 2013

Last edited Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:28 AM - Edit history (1)

It looks like someone simply degraded a quality photo of the president with a pixelation program and stepped back to accept accolades and undeserved cash, which according to his Wikki, is exactly how he "creates".

He's no Shepard Fairey, and at $200,000 gross, it ranks to me as the same opportunistic money making scam as those quarters with Obama stickers pasted on and sold in a plastic jewel box. I wouldn't hang that in my home unless I needed something to cover a stain on the wall by my basement water heater.

Maybe it's like impressionism, where the further away from the painting the viewer stands, the more they can appreciate it. I'd begin from a couple miles then walk slowly backwards.

The opinion of others certainly may differ, but I'll be the first on my block to point out that the emperor has no clothes.

Michael Moore can cut me a check for this masterpiece later:



There goes seven minutes down the drain.


Heidi

(58,237 posts)
6. Please watch this video about Close's technique and process.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 03:53 AM
Jan 2013


I would not hang the inauguration print in my home, but there's a lot more than seven minutes involved Chuck Close's work.

JohnnyRingo

(18,618 posts)
12. I do understand more about his style now...
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:21 AM
Jan 2013

...and I thank you for the edification.

I love photo realism, especially the famed work of Gary Erbe, and I didn't know that amazing self portrait of Close was a painting. It's that good, but I apparently don't care for his newborn style of mixing it with impressionism. It just looks computer manipulated to me, and I don't know how unique and distinctive that can be.

When I mentioned seven minutes, I of course meant how long it took me to throw together my own version of the Michael Moore portrait. I guess if I sat down and painted every pixel by hand, I'd want $100 too. LOL

Regardless, my opinion is of little value if art experts say otherwise, and it's not like I'm leaving the party over it or anything.

Heidi

(58,237 posts)
14. I love photo realism, too.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 06:37 AM
Jan 2013


Perhaps you would like, as I do, the work of painter Scott Fraser.

http://www.sfraser.com/pages/paintings01.html

Here's a video about the making of his painting, "Reign."

JohnnyRingo

(18,618 posts)
15. That is indeed impressive!
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 07:13 AM
Jan 2013

I've never heard of him, but I like what I see. At times it was hard to tell his subject in the video from the canvas. My favorite photo-realism paintings are of subjects that are impossible to occur in the physical world, though.

I'll soften my criticism of the Close work and just say that I really don't like the pose by Obama. As you recall in the 2008 work by Fairey Shepard, Obama was looking stalwart and resolutely upward, as if he was facing an uncertain future with confidence and courage. In the Close portrait it's as if he's saying: "How ya doin' ?". Those white dots are distracting too.

If I could pick someone to paint the inaugural poster, I don't think I'd choose an artist like Close. I'd go with someone who actually paints posters. As my avatar would indicate, that'd be the great '60s pop artist Peter Max.

They could have just picked any one of his "44 Obamas", and I may have bought a poster myself:





On edit: I'm beginning to like the pixelled image I created of Michael Moore better everytime I look at it, so maybe that style can grow on me.

catpuke9000

(4 posts)
7. I like Chuck Close
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 04:09 AM
Jan 2013

I've always liked this self-portrait by Chuck Close. It makes me wish I lived in the 60s and was a political radical.
[link:|

JohnnyRingo

(18,618 posts)
10. I like that image as well.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:02 AM
Jan 2013

Fortunately, he didn't take it in the reflection of a fun house mirror. On edit: I never knew until now that was a huge photo-real painting. It's that good.

It's clear I'm very disappointed that the inauguration committee chose that distorted version of what I didn't think was an interesting photo of the president to begin with though.

Like Banksy, Shepard Fairey's avant street art is instantly recognizable as his own. He borrowed an iconic photo and edited it in a way that had never before been tried for the 2008 inauguration, and it retains it's appeal and distinction to this day.

It could also be said the Beatles introduced a new kind of music that was always present in other forms, but no one ever tried it before in their style. I see this easily manipulated print of Obama is as unique and distinctive as The Banana Splits.

I know art is in the eye of the beholder, but the committee could have done better in my opinion. At 2013 prints (unsigned?), I'm sure they'll sell every one of them, but they should probably lie about what they paid for it. Glenn Close could have done a better job.

Once again... I know many will like it, but I'm more than unimpressed.

catpuke9000

(4 posts)
11. There's this thing called Artprize where I live.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:06 AM
Jan 2013

It's like an American Idol type contest where people get to vote for their favorite art. There are tons of things made out things, like, it's a picture made out of gumballs, or it's a giant penny made out of pennies. That is what the inauguration poster reminds me of, Artprize.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
13. Better yet, take that $100, split in to two $50 bills and give them away.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:42 AM
Jan 2013

What is just another piece of crap to throw away in a few weeks or months can make a lot of difference in someones life today.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Be the first on your bloc...