General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Paul Krugman should be President Obama's pick for US treasury secretary
Not only is he the world's best-known economist, Krugman has the intellect and integrity to resist Wall Street's calls for austerity
President Obama hasn't picked a treasury secretary yet for his second term, so he has a chance to do something different.
He could ignore what Wall Street and conservative media interests want and pick somebody who would represent what the electorate voted for. And not even just the people who voted for him: there are a lot of Republican voters out there who are also unemployed.
I know what you are thinking: this is impossible. There is too much money and power on the other side of this idea...But Obama has surprised us before. Last June, he picked Jim Kim to run the World Bank. This was unprecedented and an historic change; Kim is practically the only World Bank president in 60 years who was not previously a banker or a war criminal. On the contrary, Kim had spent most of his entire adult life trying to help poor people get healthcare.
<...>
Krugman would be tough to oppose on any substantive grounds. He has a Nobel Prize in economics (also the John Bates Clark award for best economist under 40). The New York Times columnist is probably the best-known living economist in the United States, and perhaps the world.
- more -
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/05/paul-krugman-obama-treasury-secretary
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)I like the nerds.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)but then I'm a big Krugman fan.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And the World Bank spot was in danger of going to someone from another country.
Krugman will remain banished from the White House until he embraces triangulation, which he will not barring a brain trauma of some sort.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Krugman will remain banished from the White House until he embraces triangulation, which he will not barring a brain trauma of some sort."
...that the most important thing in the world to you is to prove Obama is a sellout who should be despised.
Krugman is a practical person who rarily subccumbs to knee-jerk.
By PAUL KRUGMAN
The centrist fantasy of a Grand Bargain on the budget never had a chance. Even if some kind of bargain had supposedly been reached, key players would soon have reneged on the deal probably the next time a Republican occupied the White House.
For the reality is that our two major political parties are engaged in a fierce struggle over the future shape of American society. Democrats want to preserve the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and add to them what every other advanced country has: a more or less universal guarantee of essential health care. Republicans want to roll all of that back, making room for drastically lower taxes on the wealthy. Yes, its essentially a class war.
The fight over the fiscal cliff was just one battle in that war. It ended, arguably, in a tactical victory for Democrats. The question is whether it was a Pyrrhic victory that set the stage for a larger defeat.
Why do I say that it was a tactical victory? Mainly because of what didnt happen: There were no benefit cuts.
<...>
There were also some actual positives from a progressive point of view. Expanded unemployment benefits were given another year to run, a huge benefit to many families and a significant boost to our economic prospects (because this is money that will be spent, and hence help preserve jobs). Other benefits to lower-income families were given another five years although, unfortunately, the payroll tax break was allowed to expire, which will hurt both working families and job creation.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/kurgman-battles-of-the-budget.html
stultusporcos
(327 posts)should he be despised no, just exposed.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"No need to prove it PBO is doing it all on his own should he be despised no, just exposed."
...is the most important thing. What a bullshit waste of time.
stultusporcos
(327 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)..
YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)...and, for a non-economist like me, written in a way that explains our economic situation so that even I can understand it.
He has had an important role in recent years making the progressive case for fixing our economic mess. I think having him out there in the media has been helpful to the Obama Administration. If he were to become Treasury Secretary, that would surely change but he would be a very good choice.
I think MoveOn has a petition out there...
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)Which is why it won't happen.
Weisbrot is correct. I'm thinking "This is impossible."
Go ahead. Make me a believer.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)non-economists have held the job, of course, but they will end up just taking somebody's word for a lot of stuff
Reich's a good man, but not for treasury.
IMO.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,252 posts)He would have to know how many people want Krugman...you think many would sign it?
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)He'd be dragged down by the political realities of the position.
radiclib
(1,811 posts)Won't happen.
Should happen, but that's irrelevant. Wall Street owns the position.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)When it comes to economics, Krugman is the smartest guy in the room no matter where he goes.
Barack Obama is the smartest guy in the room when it comes to a lot of things, especially foreign policy, but not when it comes to economics.
Krugman would be a perfect match. Then we would have two smartest guys in the room in two really important areas. With Kerry at State, set to go.
I don't really know much about Hagel. I think Obama's choosing Hagel is a smart move on Obama's part, but I don't know how smart Hagel is. So, no opinion there.
But Krugman at Treasury and Bernanke at the Fed would be a good balance. They would keep each other in check. Two smart guys bringing two points of view.
I sure hope Obama gets the courage to pick Krugman.
That would be so great, but I don't know whether Obama would have the votes in the Senate. That's my only question. Anyway the nomination hearings would be an eye-opener for the nation. An opportunity to educate the American people.
Even if Krugman couldn't make it through the Senate, he might change the minds of some Americans. I really hope Obama does this.
Hagel and Kerry should be shoo-ins. If they aren't Republicans will look like fools and worse -- bad losers.
So Obama could risk putting Krugman up. Chances are Krugman would get the post. I sure would like to see that.
Obama could get a team he could really work with: Kerry, Hagel and Krugman. Dream team.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...was Krugman's teacher? Although Krugman turned out with different views I guess than Bernanke.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I think they could balance each other.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)rurallib
(62,406 posts)don't they own that position?
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)who have been employed by Goldman Sachs.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Read the latest Taibbi article in Rolling Stone.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)but can't find a link to verify it. Whoever it is it won't be anyone like Krugman but someone Wall Street wants.
Your link also puts forth Wall Streeters:
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)suggested Krugman.
However, I don't blame him for not wanting the job. He would be a Keynesian mouse in a house full of Wall Street fat cats.
garthranzz
(1,330 posts)I'd love to see Krugman at Treasury.
And Obama would welcome the dialogue.
The nomination would give the Republicans fit. A real liberal - with a Nobel Prize in his field - and they'll want to block the nomination. Good luck with that.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)..in the GOP and Wall Street, and hire Krugman. Get it over with. He gave Wall Street a chance in his first term.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Not only the neo-conservatives, but some of the most powerful interests in the country, including the right wing of the pro-Israel lobby, have launched a smear campaign. But so far, Obama has not backed down. This could have something to do with the fact that he no longer has to run for re-election.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/05/paul-krugman-obama-treasury-secretary
It appears to me that makes Hagel a better pick, not the demon he's being painted as in some OPs. The fact Lindsay Graham is against him and that John Kerry and Mex Cleland are for him are good in my view, as well. And this is exactly what I want to have happen, if the article is correct..
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Pointing out that someone is not a Democrat isn't really "trashing" them, pointing out things they have said and positions they've held in the past isn't "trashing" either.
RedstDem
(1,239 posts)they hate Mr.Krugman like no other on the planet.
Peregrine
(992 posts)Let Boner argue with an economist about the economy.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)Press reports say President Obama will soon nominate a new Treasury Secretary . Press speculation has centered on candidates likely to support the Wall Street agenda of cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits and other domestic spending rather than government policies to create jobs. We want President Obama to nominate Nobel prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, who opposes austerity and wants the government to focus on creating jobs.
That's why I signed a petition to President Barack Obama, which says:
"We urge you to nominate Paul Krugman for Treasury Secretary. Krugman will protect Social Security and Medicare from benefit cuts, promote policies to create jobs, and help defeat the austerity dogma in Washington and around the world."
Will you sign this petition? Click here:
http://signon.org/sign/nominate-paul-krugman?source=s.em.cp&r_by=398275
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)let's try to get him to anyway. I signed the petition. Come on everyone, why not?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the Great Depression.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Than outside pissing in.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)way too much time on your hands if you're spending it wondering what I'm thinking.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)However, for some reason, I tend to like Robert Reich more.
Either or is fine.