General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, Guns Don't Kill People?
Really?
Ok, so why exactly does the map of national gun deaths from 2006 look like this..
Firearm Deaths Per State 2006 via The Atlantic
While the map of states with the toughest gun laws look like this?
Strength of Gun Laws per State
Hmmm.... Is there a pattern forming?
MORE:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/10/1177729/-So-Guns-Don-t-Kill-People-eh
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)...how many of the states with higher death rates are "shall issue" states?
Iowa recently changed from a "may issue" to a "shall issue" state. I wonder if the low rate of gun deaths in Iowa will change because of that (the top graphic above is from 2006, before the change). I know some top law enforcement officials were not in favor of the change.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But I already knew that.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)That guns don't kill people.
If one tries hard enough you can kill someone with a large rock and guns make no difference whatsoever.
Please try to keep up.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)People kill. Guns make it easier.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The Magistrate
(95,243 posts)And it is nonesense to extract accident and suicide from gun deaths as a concern for public policy and law.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Have you heard about the "educator and lifelong Democrat?"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1240203475#post7
geomon666
(7,512 posts)derp
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)California gets and A but has more problems than New York that gets a B and is just slightly ahead of Colorado and Wyoming, both of which probably have a good portion of their deaths due to big game hunting accidents. Michigan has a C but has as many deaths per 100K as does Kansas, which has an F.
What we have here is a lack of statistical significance.