Psssssssssssssst Public Threat Yeager can no longer legally carry a a handgun

[malaise]

http://www.wbir.com/news/article/249212/2/West-TN-man-loses-handgun-carry-permit-after-making-video-threats
<snip>
A West Tennessee man can no longer legally carry a a handgun, after he made threatening posts on the internet site YouTube.

The Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security announced Friday that they had suspended James Yeager's handgun carry permit.

Yeager, 42, of Camden, posted videos claiming he would "start killing people" if the Obama administration took executive action to pass gun control measures.

Officials said the decision to suspend Yeager's handgun carry permit was based on a "material likelihood of risk of harm to the public" (TCA 39-17-1352).

"The number one priority for our department is to ensure the public's safety. Mr. Yeager's comments were irresponsible, dangerous, and deserved our immediate attention. Due to our concern, as well as that of law enforcement, his handgun permit was suspended immediately. We have notified Mr. Yeager about the suspension today via e-mail. He will receive an official notification of his suspension through the mail," Commissioner Bill Gibbons said.
--------
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaah hahahahaha

[tridim]

1. I wonder if he now wants to murder the good folks at the TN Dept of Safety?

[SkyDaddy7]

31. Hopefully he loses his Federal Firearms License...

So he can no longer sell firearms...We will see.

[Major Nikon]

33. I think you can count on it

I also think you can count on him completely disregarding their edict. Gun idiotology obviously trumps the rules of civilized society for people like him.

[SharonAnn]

155. I don't think that will stop him. Peaple who lose Driver's License still drive.

[diabeticman]

2. laugh at it BUT my wife has worked for a right wing telemarketing company. She's seen the scripts

for the NRA and the ACLJ (Jay Secalow --or however he spells his name) This guy will be the new rallying point.


Don't get me wrong the guy deserved that and a little more BUT this guy is the next "Joe the Plummer" for the right.

[Scuba]

6. Could be. Joe sure helped sink McCain's ship, this nutjob could do the same for someone ...

... more likely, the R's will run from him. They can smell the change in public opinion.

[upaloopa]

8. Well the idiots need an idiot leader and they now

have one

[leftynyc]

135. I'm perfectly happy with this cretin

to be the face of "gun rights". He's a lunatic and that rant on you tube will get even more attention and I'm guessing the independents will be as horrified as we all are at his lunacy.

[elehhhhna]

12. yep - they'll be defending his right to freely speechify terroristic threats

and they'll lose to their patriotact terroristic threats legislation


deliciously ironic

[sendero]

27. Nonsense..

... even the right wing bullshit-o-sphere isn't that stupid. The guy made terroristic threats. He is lucky he is not in jail, much less a poster boy for gun control.

[Tarheel_Dem]

68. If he were brown, with a Muslim surname, you can bet your hiney he'd be in custody, and the right...

wing noise machine & Peter King would be calling on the DOJ to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. They are world class hypocrites, and giant phoneys.

[VOX]

126. +1,000,000,000,000

A-bloody-men!

[muntrv]

151. Actually, the righties would demand no trial for the brown Muslim and indefinite detention at GITMO.

[awoke_in_2003]

94. You give them too much credit...

I guarantee one of my coworkers will be saying on Monday that Obama did this.

[alcibiades_mystery]

53. Who cares? These gun nuts are increasingly irrelevant to the arguments. They can rally around loons

til doomsday. Doesn't matter a whit. We're not having conversations with these idiots anymore. We're simply imposing public health laws on them. They can eat the penalties for noncompliance.

[malaise]

59. +1,000

Well said

[Shampoobra]

86. Best quote of the day

"We're not having conversations with these idiots anymore. We're simply imposing public health laws on them."

[SouthernDonkey]

129. Amen!

I've quit arguing with right wing idiot friends of friends on facebutt when they go there with the bullshit! I just shut up and post a little smirky face and leave it at that. I know it has to chap their ass, because they know we have the majority now and don't really give two shits about their blabbering rants!

[The Magistrate]

3. Excellent, Ma'am

Sounds like the sort of thing he said to set him to killing people, of course....

[Nay]

41. Indeed! There's the flashpoint the gentleman has been waiting for! Dare I say, "Bring it on!"?

[malaise]

71. I dare him

This is going to be interesting - swat teams will gobble them up

[frylock]

77. the line in the sand has indeed been crossed, sir!

[2naSalit]

89. Apparently, a self-fulfilling prophecy.

[Rider3]

4. Finally...

Nice to see some action taken on a person who, not only is a bully, but is clearly a threat to society's safety. Guy's got a loose screw in there someplace.

[mfcorey1]

5. The increased threats from him and his nutbag colleagues really have me nervous

for the President. All of this meltdown because of fabricated fears that the government is going to knock on their doors and take away their guns. I am tempted to get a gun because they won't put theirs down.

[freshwest]

81. I've been freaked about these guys since Medgar Evers was murdered at his own home.

He had come home to announce the good news he'd heard that morning:

In the early morning of June 12, 1963, just hours after President John F. Kennedy's speech on national television in support of civil rights, Evers pulled into his driveway after returning from a meeting with NAACP lawyers. Emerging from his car and carrying NAACP T-shirts that read "Jim Crow Must Go," Evers was struck in the back with a bullet fired from an Enfield 1917 rifle; it ricocheted into his home. He staggered 9 meters (30 feet) before collapsing. He died at a local hospital 50 minutes later.[11]

Mourned nationally, Evers was buried on June 19 in Arlington National Cemetery, where he received full military honors before a crowd of more than 3,000.

On June 21, 1963, Byron De La Beckwith, a fertilizer salesman and member of the White Citizens' Council (and later of the Ku Klux Klan), was arrested for Evers' murder.[12]

District Attorney and future governor Bill Waller prosecuted De La Beckwith. Juries composed solely of white men twice that year deadlocked on De La Beckwith's guilt.

In 1994, 30 years after the two previous trials had failed to reach a verdict, De La Beckwith was brought to trial based on new evidence. Bobby DeLaughter was the prosecutor. During the trial, the body of Evers was exhumed from his grave for autopsy.[3] De La Beckwith was convicted of murder on February 5, 1994, after having lived as a free man for much of the three decades following the killing (he was imprisoned on an unrelated charge from 1977 to 1980). De La Beckwith appealed unsuccessfully, and died at age 80 in prison in January 2001.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medgar_Evers

Now his widow will speak at the Inauguration this year. It's way past time we got past this regressive way of thinking. They won't go down without kicking and screaming, though. I also fear for our president and our nation.

[Left Coast2020]

154. I fear one of these mental midgets is going to have one too many beers and....

do something stupid. This guy is not the only one that is about to go over the edge. Sad that they can't find something else to stroke instead of their 9mm.

[SirRevolutionary]

7. Ha! They took his precious

"Mr. Yeager's comments were irresponsible, dangerous, and deserved our immediate attention", they forgot to add that it's word salad and falls under the category of incoherent internet tough guy rambling.

Let's see his imaginary text-messaging tough guy warriors respond. Gentlemen, man the smart phones to combat this gub'ment intrusion!

[wryter2000]

9. I love this

Some things just make you smile.

[tanyev]

10. Self-fulfilling prophecy is fulfilled.

[JoePhilly]

11. I can't wait to see this idiot's NEXT video!!!!

[malaise]

18. Here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=365001

[Sunlei]

125. Now he's in his house with 100 guns and a doubled down bad temper. He doesn't care about a permit.

[jody]

13. Agree and remove all other civil rights to make the point. nt

[LanternWaste]

22. To precisely what effect?

"nd remove all other civil rights to make the point..."

To precisely what effect?

[jody]

25. You don't know the effect of removing a person's civil rights? Better read about Parks and King. nt

[LanternWaste]

28. He may still own his handgun...

He may still own his handgun...

But again, to what effect do you believe he should have all civil rights removed (regardless of what you think I may or may not need to read)

[jody]

34. Good question. I don't know of any legal way to deny just one of a person's civil rights. Do you? nt

[LanternWaste]

55. Then may I safely presume your direct suggestion of removing

" I don't know of any legal way to deny just one of a person's civil rights..."

Then may we safely presume your direct suggestion of removing all his civil rights was merely grade-school petulance on your part? Or possibly you're attempting to make a vague and diaphanous point with to no great effect or reason...?

[jody]

58. My post was for graduate-school level understanding. Apparently I overestimated the ability of some.

[LanternWaste]

62. Most likely yourself.

"Apparently I overestimated the ability of some...."

Most likely yourself. Petulance is rarely graduate level, more often seen in 4th graders. Bless your little heart...

[Rex]

144. That epic troll has left the building.

Evidently the admins DO pay attention to what people type on their site.

[leftynyc]

136. Pretty obnoxious

for someone who just got their ass handed to them.

[Rex]

143. Your post earned you a grade of T.

For troll!

[yardwork]

91. No legal way to deny just one of a person's civil rights?

Yes, that happens all the time. People get their licenses revoked for drunk driving, for instance, but they retain their other rights. People convicted of felonies lose the right to vote and a few other rights but the Bill of Rights still applies to them.

Are you suggesting that the state of Tennessee illegally removed this man's right to own a weapon?

[NYC Liberal]

105. Read the OP. That's one way.

Ever heard of gag orders that limit a person's freedom of speech?

Or restraining orders that limit a person's freedom to travel?

Or an involuntary psychiatric hold?

Or a quarantine?

[VOX]

127. Present a clear and present danger or threat to society, or any elected officials...

And this guy, or anyone like him, forfeits the kind of "civil rights" to which you refer.

[kestrel91316]

67. Ignore the troll. He's all butthurt because his terrorist buddy lost his Precious.

[ellisonz]

88. Such Delicate Flowers...

[2ndAmForComputers]

97. That is a correct assessment.

Although a bit more polite than warranted.

[obama2terms]

87. The cops are watching him trust me

[Tsiyu]

38. Did Parks or King threaten to start shooting people?

What part about "threatening to shoot people" is hard for you to comprehend?

Threatened: said he would do it
Shooting: aiming a gun and firing at other humans
People: the humans he aims to start firing bullets at

Did Parks or King threaten this?

Love these False equivalances you people pull out of your asses.

[AlbertCat]

146. Love these False equivalances you people pull out of your asses.

It's a cult. The gun worshiping cult.

All logic and common sense fly out the window and are replaced by over-emotional baloney that doesn't exist. Y'know like the world ending on Dec 21st. Or the spaceship that built the pyramids is coming hiding behind a comet. It's just the same.

People not swayed by ridiculous crap must clean up the cult's mess... again.

[BlueStreak]

45. Forget "militia". What do you think the words "well regulated" mean?

Even if we can't agree on exactly what the word "militia" means in the 2nd amendment, can somebody please explain why they would have included the words "well regulated" if they did not mean laws and government action?

What else could those words possibly mean?

[jody]

49. From DC v Heller,

a. “Well-Regulated Militia.” In United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, 179 (1939) , we explained that “the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense.” That definition comports with founding-era sources. See, e.g., Webster (“The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades … and required by law to attend military exercises on certain days only, but at other times left to pursue their usual occupations”); The Federalist No. 46, pp. 329, 334 (B. Wright ed. 1961) (J. Madison) (“near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands”); Letter to Destutt de Tracy (Jan. 26, 1811), in The Portable Thomas Jefferson 520, 524 (M. Peterson ed. 1975) (“[T]he militia of the State, that is to say, of every man in it able to bear arms”).

Petitioners take a seemingly narrower view of the militia, stating that “[m]ilitias are the state- and congressionally-regulated military forces described in the Militia Clauses (art. I, §8, cls. 15–16).” Brief for Petitioners 12. Although we agree with petitioners’ interpretive assumption that “militia” means the same thing in Article I and the Second Amendment , we believe that petitioners identify the wrong thing, namely, the organized militia. Unlike armies and navies, which Congress is given the power to create (“to raise … Armies”; “to provide … a Navy,” Art. I, §8, cls. 12–13), the militia is assumed by Article I already to be in existence. Congress is given the power to “provide for calling forth the militia,” §8, cl. 15; and the power not to create, but to “organiz[e]” it—and not to organize “a” militia, which is what one would expect if the militia were to be a federal creation, but to organize “the” militia, connoting a body already in existence, ibid., cl. 16. This is fully consistent with the ordinary definition of the militia as all able-bodied men. From that pool, Congress has plenary power to organize the units that will make up an effective fighting force. That is what Congress did in the first militia Act, which specified that “each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective states, resident therein, who is or shall be of the age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia.” Act of May 8, 1792, 1 Stat. 271. To be sure, Congress need not conscript every able-bodied man into the militia, because nothing in Article I suggests that in exercising its power to organize, discipline, and arm the militia, Congress must focus upon the entire body. Although the militia consists of all able-bodied men, the federally organized militia may consist of a subset of them.

Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training. See Johnson 1619 (“Regulate”: “To adjust by rule or method”); Rawle 121–122; cf. Va. Declaration of Rights §13 (1776), in 7 Thorpe 3812, 3814 (referring to “a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms”).

[BlueStreak]

54. That seems to argue that we cannot ignore "militia". Nonetheless

your citation concludes with, "the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."

So again, I ask. What does the word "imposition" mean if it does not involve laws and government action?

[jody]

57. Heller is the law of the land at this time. Well regulated and militia are not needed because

Congress has all the authority it needs regarding militia in Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 16 of our constitution.

[BlueStreak]

107. But the point is that clause includes the words "well regulated"

What meaning could that possibly have other than government enforcement?

You seem to arguing that government doesn't have the responsibility to regulate guns, yet it is right there in plain English. And I see nothing in the Heller quote that indicates otherwise.

[AlbertCat]

147. That definition comports with founding-era sources.

OK....if you're gonna use the 18th century definition of "well regulated", you must use the 18th century definition of "arms" as well. We cannot define the 1st part of the sentence one way and the last part another.

So teach those boys how to load a flintlock. You have the right to own flintlocks.

[pansypoo53219]

120. well regulated means, confiscate all his firearms.

gitmo still has room right?

[Wednesdays]

138. Well, I'm not afraid of anything

...oh, except a lighted match.

[Quasimodem]

122. Well regulated militia.

They eat a lot of fiber.

[BlueStreak]

123. Nothing more dangerous than a bunch of constipated old men with loaded guns

[kestrel91316]

66. Awwwwww........you all upset that they took the terrorist's Precious?????

[jody]

69. See #13. Do you know what "Agree" means? nt

[2ndAmForComputers]

93. We know what "passive-aggressive" means.

[Warren Stupidity]

117. It means you are treading carefully these days.

[Warren Stupidity]

118. But not carefully enough. Buh-bye.

[bettyellen]

78. Are you actually suggesting he shld retain his "right" to bear arms after

What he did?
You really think everyone should have guns no matter what they say or do?

That seems to be the point you're attempting to make.

[2ndAmForComputers]

95. Your questions are, of course, rhetorical.

Things are exactly like you say.

[RainDog]

111. Your reply is a steaming pile of shit

The jump from enforcing the law to removing civil rights is mighty large for most folks.

but not for you.

and THEN you have the gall to put the racist anti-Obama nutters in the same category as people who, in the last century, fought for civil rights.

You need to stop with this false equivalency that rightly chills this neo-confederate hate bullshit that contain actual threats of physical violence and counter revolution with civil rights.

[Warren Stupidity]

119. Won't anyone rid me of this troublesome troll?

Oh wait, Thanks EarlG!

[RainDog]

121. I'm always the last to know anything on DU

I can't keep up and I'm not here often enough to wallow in the metamud

[GeorgeGist]

14. This guy wants to replace Ted Nugent for being too smart.

[1StrongBlackMan]

15. What happens ...

to the weapons that a previously lawful possessor has his/her priviledge suspended/revoked. Does law enforcement accept that the suspendee will just promise not to touch the now prohibited weapons?

Anyone know?

It seems that he is about to get his wish.

[Motown_Johnny]

20. He can still keep them in his home or business

this is just his ability to walk around with a pistol on him

[1StrongBlackMan]

23. So ...

it's just his priviledge to carry; not his priviledge to possess?

[Motown_Johnny]

24. as I understand it, yes

[Historic NY]

116. In Ny they must be surrendered, the sheriff will come out...

and collect them.

[GeorgeGist]

16. It just keeps getting better.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=365001

[malaise]

17. Federal Prison coming up

Won't be long.
The problem with these stupid fucks is that they do not read

[Lars39]

19. Now they need to pull his business licenses.

[Cha]

21. The Tennessee Homeland Security Dept

realizes that threats like this cannot be ignored. They are not just warning signs of instability.. they're "In Your Face, MOs.. I'm gonna get you with my stupid guns!"

I'm glad James Yaeger is such a Stupid Stupid man.

[samsingh]

26. isn't he going to resist or is he staying indoors

[Fresh_Start]

29. hopefully his customers will fire him

since I'm not sure having someone that unstable is a good business decision.

[Odin2005]

30. $100 bucks says Yeager isn't his real last name.

In another thread a poster mentioned that "Yeager" is a common alias of while supremacists.

[malaise]

32. Wow

Didn't know that - explain further please

[Odin2005]

40. Can't remember which thread it was.

[riqster]

65. It is a misspelled version of Jeager

"Or "Hunter" auf englische.

[Thinkingabout]

35. When is Texas going to pull Alex Jones CCW, he has made threats also.

This would be a good time since the nuts are coming out themselves. They have no one to blame for their stupid mouths but themselves.

[Politicub]

36. I hope people like him keep making youtube videos since they reveal themselves to be the dicks

they are.

[SummerSnow]

37. He'll be on Fox snooze crying and bitching along with Hannity

He'll file a lawsuit ...bitch some more. Then he'll get a call from Ted Nugent ...both will bitch some more.

[Buns_of_Fire]

61. As a guest? Naw, this guy's HOST material!

Team him up with Alex Jones!

[grantcart]

82. just make sure that they are both fully armed.

Put them on late in the afternoon and keep their schedule packed during the day so they don't have a chance to eat.


Then have the producer talking in each guys ear provoking each one.


Would be better than pay per view.

[livefromsac]

39. He said he'd start killing people if the gov took his guns... Well, look what just happened.

[calimary]

43. Welcome to DU, livefromsac!

VERY happy to see this nutcase dis-armed. Not that he'd stay that way. I'll bet the first thing he does after they yank his license is to go out and get MORE guns illegally. There's no stopping these people, short of long-term incarceration.

[glinda]

75. Good point from the newbie! Welcome!

[malaise]

84. They took his permit not his guns

I dare him to try using them now

[freshwest]

141. He can still fight without his arms. Unless he was rendered toothless, no need to give up now.

I'll never quit posting that skit.

[calimary]

42. Is that the jackass with the tattoos looking into his little camera and making murderous threats?

YET ANOTHER example of unhinged delusional assholes with anger issues - who have NO BUSINESS anywhere NEAR guns of any kind!

[malaise]

44. Yep

One of them

[calimary]

112. That man is a PUBLIC MENACE!!!!

And so are all the others like him.

[Recursion]

46. That is awesome (nt)

[Flatulo]

47. Wait - they took his permit. That's just a piece of paper. They need to confiscate his firearms

as well.

Taking his license is meaningless if he decides to go out in a blaze of glory. What, is he going to fear the penalty for unlawful possession while on his way to commit murder?

[malaise]

50. These idiots have some fantasy wild West views of life

and a heavy dose of racism.

[Flatulo]

98. Well if it's martyrdom he seeks, I hope he finds it without

taking anyone else with him.

[RomneyLies]

48. Now they need to charge him with making a murderous threat

Convict his ass and insure he can never legally own a gun again in his life.

[malaise]

51. They will leave him to self destruct

and he will

[A Simple Game]

99. He's threatened the Government and claims to have put together an army.

That must merit some kind of charge. Insurrection?

[99Forever]

52. Couldn't have happened to ...

... a better coward.

[chuckrocks]

56. oh no! now the criminals know they can rob him!

[still_one]

60. He should be arrested for making a threat to do bodily harm to people

[redwitch]

63. Have they confiscated his arsenal?

Because if they don't there is not much point.

[2pooped2pop]

64. thanks for posting this.

I was hoping we'd hear something like this about this guy. I wish I could of seen him when he was told. lol

[davesliberal1977_gg]

70. Bwhahaha, what a doofus

Perhaps this will teach him a lesson, about keeping his big mouth shut, when it comes to saying such things. Typical RW gun nut maniac.

[PeaceNikki]

72. state's rights, asshole!

[Solly Mack]

73. ROFLMAO

[defacto7]

74. Psssssssssssssst

...but he doesn't care..... and people like him probably don't care either.

But I'm glad the Tennessee Department of Safety did it. It's a start but we have a long way to go.

[frylock]

76. this won't sit well with his formidable army

[malaise]

83. DUzy

[Democratopia]

79. We now need to see the same happen for Alex Jones.

Jones should also have to undergo a mental health assessment to see if he should be institutionalized in order to protect society.

[Fearless]

80. Foiled by laws upheld by the Bush Administration.

[WillyT]

85. ROFLMAO !!! - K & R !!!

[WheelWalker]

90. The guy "self-registered" on the mental health no-carry list. They just MIGHT

come for his guns, now.

[Canoe52]

92. Go to his Youtube channel

most of the comments left there are just slamming him for being such an a**hole.



In one of his videos he says that Piers Morgan was the one who made a threat to Alex Jones... sorry dude you need to figure out which planet you are on, cause you for sure ain't on this one...

[malaise]

101. LOL

Welcome to DU

[Larrymoe Curlyshemp]

96. Awwwwwwwww

[babylonsister]

100. Perfect! Wasn't he supposed to be on Ed tonight? Was he?

I just got home and haven't seen news all day.

[malaise]

104. I didn't know that

Ha

[babylonsister]

108. Yep. Ed mentioned his appearance last night. I guess

it didn't happen?!

[Tx4obama]

110. Ed said he canceled due to advice from his attorney. n/t

[Warren DeMontague]

102. What will he do, without his dick?

Sorry, gun.

[Snarkoleptic]

103. Looks like he, errrr...shot himself in the foot.

Stupid is as stupid does.

[Canuckistanian]

106. This sort of thing should be happening on a regular basis

If the NSA can read everything we we post, then permits should be revoked based on what they read.

[RomneyLies]

109. There's a huge controversy regarding this prick and him being a COWARD

Seems when he worked with Edinburgh Risk and Security Management (ESRM) in IRaq, he demonstrated COWARDICE UNDER FIRE:

http://mountainrunner.us/2006/01/edinburgh_risk_/#.UPDEt_KGe3M

So take that as you will...

[malaise]

113. Oh Dear

Why am I not surprised

[RomneyLies]

115. Might have something to do with the fact that his paranoid rantings come off as the rantings of a

COWARD?

[geomon666]

114. Well you can't really blame the dude for that.

They were firing back after all.

[apocalypsehow]

124. I wonder what handle he posts under down in the Gungeon? As a "pro gun progressive,"* of course...

*( )

This is actually how the vast majority of those who feel they can't venture to Wal Mart without a pistol perched in their pants no doubt fantasize about acting out like: they are simply itching to get into a shooting war with other Americans, this gump just happened to be stupid enough to verbalize it on YouTube.

[tblue37]

128. Hahahahahahahaha!!! nt

[watoos]

130. Not like this hasn't happened in Tennessee before.

The guy who walked into a church and started shooting because he couldn't get near the top Libruls, so he went after the people who voted for the Libruls.
Yeah, all of the people I know who own assault rifles are pretty paranoid.
Also, are people sane who hide loaded guns throughout their house, you tell me?

[xoom]

131. Good! That will keep him away from guns.

[Recursion]

132. Well, no, he just can't legally carry them anymore

Since he's in Tennessee he won't have to surrender his handguns, though, and I don't think anywhere requires a license to own a rifle.

Still, I like seeing him taken down a peg.

[xoom]

133. Fur sure.

[Berlum]

134. Republican Family Values

As usual.

These RepubliWankers really need to try American Values.

[kooljerk666]

137. If he lost a Concealed carry, then he just straps a cowboy holster on..........

....he just can't hide it. Also I am not sure if it is allowed to be loaded or accessible when driving.

[toby jo]

139. Guy sees holes in the world & calls em danger, but the only holes are in his head

[whoisthatis]

140. Pardon my ad hominem but...

Can we legally get rid of his silly beard as well.

[sulphurdunn]

142. A great deal of the discussion

on this thread has dealt with what the suspension of civil rights means. Whatever else it means, it most definitely means the de facto suspension of Habeas Corpus and the authority to commit the extrajudicial murder of American citizens by their own government.

[John2]

145. Well I think he

was a lot of hot air. Let's see how far he think he can get by beating his chest at the Government? They can put him in chains for all I care. Let him beat his chest behind bars.

[Autumn]

148. Psssssssssssssst, if he were not white he would be in jail

that's IMO a real fucking problem. K/R at least the ass can't "legally" carry a a handgun. But I bet he will.

[malaise]

149. Valid point n/t

[arely staircase]

150. the irony is great

guy complains (frighteningly) about an imaginary threat to his ability to carry a gun. this causes him to lose said ability.

[blkmusclmachine]

152. That'll show him!

[r2p]

153. Yeager give white supremacist code signal?

Rumor going around in Memphis bars Yeager gave a signal to white supremacist's for some kind of nation wide uprising the day Obama gets inaugurated.

Yeager no arrest? Govt will look stupid if something happens!