General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYPD ‘looking into’ drones to survey crowds
During an interview at the 92nd Street Y in New York City with Reuters News editor-in-chief, Kelly explained the need to look into anything that helps us, although a drone program was not being aggressively pursued currently.
When asked about the massacre in Newtown, Conn., he said that he did not believe banning assault weapons would have significant impact on gun crime because people are being shot with handguns.
He also discussed the departments counter-terrorism programs and the fact that the force has privately paid officers in 11 cities worldwide to act as tripwires or listening posts for the city.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/11/nypd-looking-into-drones-to-survey-crowds/
Drones to "survey" demonstrations? Ugh.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)it would seem like the good protesters wouldn't mind outing any bad protester with anarchy or evil on their mind
and historically infiltration by plants always happens
9-11 happened in NYC, and because of it, the nationwide economy went broke
I commend the extra security and the wanting to keep ALL guns out of the streets
it only takes one gun to kill many
guns=wmd
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Or chemical mace to disperse unruly, violent crowds?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)If you don't think plants are put into protest groups, well,you haven't followed protest history over the years
its like bad cops and baseball players who use steroids
you would think one would want to out all the bad cops and steroid users, so that
others don't think everyone is using and bad
anarchy helps no one
violence helps no one
Who wouldn't have loved a drone to hit Hitler in the head one day before the first of 20 million died?
Same with getting Osamabinladen the day before he gave the orders to do 9-11, not waited to get him 10 years later after the damage was done
Same with TimMcCoward in oklahoma, wish they had a drone then to take him out before he killed all those babies
Same with the CT shooter.
so anything that can prevent another incident like any of those, is a good thing
because my first amendment rights are violated by not being able to assemble peacefully in a supermarket, restaurant, movie theatre, etc.
And security has always been around.
Hell, I go to see concerts and sporting events at Madison Square Garden in NYC and have been frisked for 35 years now, maybe 40 or more.
It goes with the territory.
NYC is one of the safest cities in the nation
Glad they are always updating
Btw, think this is an old story, read a simliar one a long time ago
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)How many ways can this go wrong?
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)I think there's a stigma attached to the word 'drone' because we associate with a weapon of war used to kill people. The drones being discussed are web cams mounted unmanned, remote control aerial vehicles, allowing police to deploy a camera to a section of the city where a large crowd is gathering.
There is no mention by any source in NYPD of deploying armed drones that I've seen. Steering the discussion in the direction suggesting otherwise are just distracting from the real story.
All that being said, I'm not a huge fan of routinely being under camera surveillance but, as discussed many times on DU, our constitution doesn't grant an explicit right to privacy.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Or making the govern responsible for guaranteeing them.
That aside, it would if "reasonable" wasn't stretched to ANYTHING goes if someone can come up with a reason, including hunches.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Me walking into the view of your camera (at least when I know it is a camera) and you putting a camera on me are two very distinct things.