Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeJoe

(1,039 posts)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 04:00 PM Jan 2013

Guns not a priority

We have much bigger issues on which we can make much more progress. I think both sides of politicians like the gun issue because it is a distraction and a way to raise funds from the faithful. When the debate is over, we'll have a few minor tweaks that accomplish very little. In the mean time, there will be too little focus on our real problems, like or broken tax system, or lack of spending control, unrestrained drone strikes, etc.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns not a priority (Original Post) FreeJoe Jan 2013 OP
What lack of spending control? Scuba Jan 2013 #1
Walk, chew gum. Robb Jan 2013 #2
Wanting to have my 1st amendment right of peaceful assembly, I beg to disagree graham4anything Jan 2013 #3
We can chew gum and dance at the same time upaloopa Jan 2013 #4
Priority, yes. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2013 #5
So dead children and bloody slaughter aren't worth our time? Agnosticsherbet Jan 2013 #6
tell that to 26 families in Connecticut spanone Jan 2013 #7
Chew gum, walk...we can do more than one thing nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #8
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. Wanting to have my 1st amendment right of peaceful assembly, I beg to disagree
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jan 2013

and I want more spending
more spending on roads and bridges
more spending on schools
more spending on building new mass transit
more spending on finding cures for cancer and heart disease and alzheimer's
more spending on everything and anything
more spending on climate control
I for one would gladly stand for more taxes

and I am sure you would agree, more hoping Mike Bloomberg spends a lot of money supporting only anti-gun, anti-NRA candidates, so that in 5 or 6 years, we have the entire supreme court (or at least 8 to 1) and the house and the senate

and we have ZERO guns in the street except federal/state/local law enforcement, and even those have to leave their guns in the office, when their shifts protecting the public is over.

So I humbly disagree with everything.

BTW, the NRA is already dead. Their side has a finite # and finite money.

We, on the other hand, have only just begun.

The NRA didn't even know what hit them, but like the Knight who said Ni, they are gone.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
4. We can chew gum and dance at the same time
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jan 2013

We are able to work on all those things together. We have committees and they have aids and they have research.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
6. So dead children and bloody slaughter aren't worth our time?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jan 2013

But taxes are a killer?

Screw taxes.

Public safety must take priority, even if it is difficult.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guns not a priority