Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:14 PM Jan 2013

Is it possible to buy a 155mm artillery piece on the market?

With the rounds?

Would it be legal to set it up in your back yard and point it whatever direction you wanted?

You can target stuff easily from more than a mile away.

Would the NRA draw the line with artillery pieces?

What about the 175mm (Atomic Annie) that can shoot a nuclear round? Would that be acceptable to have as a collector's item?

Is there a line they would draw with any type of weapon?

I rather doubt it.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it possible to buy a 155mm artillery piece on the market? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2013 OP
well, they want their militia well armed..... spanone Jan 2013 #1
Can we please learn the state of gun laws before we complain? Recursion Jan 2013 #2
Have machine guns been banned also? kentuck Jan 2013 #3
functionally yes Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #4
Can you hunt ducks with a machine gun? kentuck Jan 2013 #5
You could set up a machine gun in a duckblind. HubertHeaver Jan 2013 #6
How come? kentuck Jan 2013 #7
You've never fired a machine gun, have you? HubertHeaver Jan 2013 #10
Actually, I have. kentuck Jan 2013 #11
I think they had a vision of reality. HubertHeaver Jan 2013 #32
Yeah, that was the problem... kentuck Jan 2013 #37
50mm ? mwrguy Jan 2013 #56
LOL... raidert05 Jan 2013 #34
Burned out barrel... stoppage... bad stuff... Bigmack Jan 2013 #40
Nope, for that you need one of these: JoeyT Jan 2013 #50
On the class III form meanit Jan 2013 #8
But weren't "machine guns" declared illegal in the 1920's? kentuck Jan 2013 #9
no, actually, you can get them, it's very expensive dionysus Jan 2013 #12
No. Assault weapons are normal rifles that look like military guns Recursion Jan 2013 #13
No ..... oldhippie Jan 2013 #14
Then why are you answering. kentuck Jan 2013 #17
It was the machine gun act of 1934 I believe, meanit Jan 2013 #23
But aren't they rather easily fixed to fire automatic?? kentuck Jan 2013 #27
If you can obtain the parts meanit Jan 2013 #31
Do you have to have an extra part? kentuck Jan 2013 #33
Its a different mechanism. HooptieWagon Jan 2013 #35
I'm not sure meanit Jan 2013 #38
Most of them... raidert05 Jan 2013 #39
The legal parts themselves are registered as Class III weapons NickB79 Jan 2013 #55
machine guns are not illegal at all...just difficult and expensive to get a license. crazyjoe Jan 2013 #36
State of gun laws? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2013 #18
Don't know about 155mm Crepuscular Jan 2013 #15
Pretty sure those were disabled (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #16
Don't think so Crepuscular Jan 2013 #26
Be sorta hard to get one of those in a schoolroom, though.. kentuck Jan 2013 #20
Doesn't Arnold Schwarzenneger own a tank? nt. thucythucy Jan 2013 #19
There's some Sherman Tanks in private hands TheMightyFavog Jan 2013 #24
have a rich uncle? d_r Jan 2013 #41
Why don't you just stick with small arms like AR's and AK's ileus Jan 2013 #21
I am just curious to where the NRA would draw the line? kentuck Jan 2013 #22
ICBM's with nuke warheads. Only one per household. Scuba Jan 2013 #25
Sounds about right. kentuck Jan 2013 #28
With a Walmart voucher! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2013 #52
I think they support the line as it was drawn in 1934 hack89 Jan 2013 #42
A mile? bluedigger Jan 2013 #29
Been a long time since I was in an artillery unit.. kentuck Jan 2013 #30
There were a lot of posts I wanted to avoid GP6971 Jan 2013 #43
Best wishes to your son from a 2nd ACR vet. Adsos Letter Jan 2013 #47
This guy is selling one. TexasPaganDem Jan 2013 #44
The breech block is missing. oneshooter Jan 2013 #46
This 90mm T8 is/was for sale oneshooter Jan 2013 #49
Good lord. A bag gun Recursion Jan 2013 #51
An operating howitzer is considered a Destructive Device jmowreader Jan 2013 #45
Let me know if you get one. Adsos Letter Jan 2013 #48
There are people who own personal tanks, jet fighters, and prop bombers Major Nikon Jan 2013 #53
Surely the FF pondered that. moondust Jan 2013 #54

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. Can we please learn the state of gun laws before we complain?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:17 PM
Jan 2013

No, not for the past 80 years, and nobody's talking about overturning that law.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
3. Have machine guns been banned also?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jan 2013

And is there really that big of a difference between machine guns and assault weapons?

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
7. How come?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jan 2013

Wouldn't ducks be falling out of the air when you pulled off a few quick spurts of machine gun fire??

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
10. You've never fired a machine gun, have you?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:43 PM
Jan 2013

After the first "spurt" ducks are gone.

Hunters on the other side of the lake are pissed.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
11. Actually, I have.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:46 PM
Jan 2013

But I emptied the magazine instead of shooting in "spurts" and was escorted off the range. Bullets were flying everywhere. They must have thought I wasn't safe around machine guns.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
37. Yeah, that was the problem...
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:31 PM
Jan 2013

I think it was a 50MM... But it kept wanting to ride upwards the more I fired? I was only attempting to mow down the target....

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
40. Burned out barrel... stoppage... bad stuff...
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:37 PM
Jan 2013

..if you fire loooong bursts.

My Gunny had a way of keeping you from firing long bursts.

A size 13 EE .....

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
50. Nope, for that you need one of these:
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 01:08 AM
Jan 2013


That gun isn't illegal to own or shoot, but it's illegal to hunt with.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
9. But weren't "machine guns" declared illegal in the 1920's?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:42 PM
Jan 2013

Then would assault weapons be illegal also, under the letter of the law??

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. No. Assault weapons are normal rifles that look like military guns
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:49 PM
Jan 2013

The AWB didn't regulate how fast guns can fire, it regulated what the fastest-firing class of legal guns could look like.

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
14. No .....
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:51 PM
Jan 2013

.... and no.

Why are you pursuing this worthless line of questioning? Building your post count? Or really don't you have anything productive to do on a Sunday evening? Me, I'm watching the Texans get their butt kicked.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
17. Then why are you answering.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jan 2013

I left because I felt sorry for the Texans and was trying to have a thoughtful discussion. Thanks for your input.

meanit

(455 posts)
23. It was the machine gun act of 1934 I believe,
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jan 2013

that made it very hard for a private citizen to obtain a machine gun, but not impossible. It takes a federal transfer tax to be paid, criminal and IRS background checks and the signed permission of the local police chief in order to buy a fully automatic machine gun.
With that said, yes, true assault weapons that can go full auto cannot just be had at the local gun dealer. What can be bought by the public are exact copies of these military assault weapons that can only fire semi auto, or as fast as you can pull the trigger. These are what your Bushmasters, etc., are.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
27. But aren't they rather easily fixed to fire automatic??
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:11 PM
Jan 2013

It's not that complicated from what I have read.

meanit

(455 posts)
31. If you can obtain the parts
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jan 2013

and have the know how, I believe any semi auto fire arm can be made full auto. Absolutely illegal to do or possess, though.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
33. Do you have to have an extra part?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:22 PM
Jan 2013

Or do you just have to remove a part that keeps it from shooting automatic? Maybe someone has knowledge of this part?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
35. Its a different mechanism.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:30 PM
Jan 2013

The parts permitting automatic fire are as tightly regulated as automatic weapons themselves. Plus, it takes machining skills to install them and modify the gas ports. Its not a DIY job.

meanit

(455 posts)
38. I'm not sure
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:31 PM
Jan 2013

what actually needs to be done to make a semi auto firearm fully automatic. It may differ from gun to gun? Hopefully it is not easy to do.
But I have heard stories of it being attempted by idiots, although unsuccessfully.

 

raidert05

(185 posts)
39. Most of them...
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jan 2013

That are semi-automatic have to have the lower receiver milled to fit the extra parts, which most people can't do and is completely illegal, there are bump-fire setups, I'm not exactly sure how they work, but I do know that they will wear a gun out faster.

 

crazyjoe

(1,191 posts)
36. machine guns are not illegal at all...just difficult and expensive to get a license.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:31 PM
Jan 2013

Have you ever seen the show Sons of Guns? The build an fire machine guns for private clients in every show. They also blow up alot of shit out in the woods of Louisiana.

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
15. Don't know about 155mm
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:51 PM
Jan 2013

but you used to be able to purchase artillery pieces as a private citizen.Here are a few pics from a catalog that I have for the "Service Armament Company" circa 1963.

They sold WWII surplus arms, you could purchase artillery, mortars, anti-aircraft guns, etc. as well as the ammunition. The only requirement on the order sheet was that you had to be an American Citizen.

[IMG][/IMG]


[IMG][/IMG]

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
26. Don't think so
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jan 2013

Here is the description for the 37MM Boffors anti-tank cannon -

"Made for the armies of various Scandinavian countries, it is chambered for the 37MM Boffors round which we have in large quantity. This cannon can easily be put in the back of a pick-up truck for transportation to the nearest firing range or sand pit for firing."

That would lead me to belief that they were not disabled.

Some of the captured German weapons were marked as de-milled and for collectors only but a lot of the artillery appears to be fully functional.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
21. Why don't you just stick with small arms like AR's and AK's
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jan 2013

Either of these are better suited for home and self defense than artillery.





hack89

(39,171 posts)
42. I think they support the line as it was drawn in 1934
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:59 PM
Jan 2013

they have never suggest the NFA be rescinded.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
29. A mile?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:14 PM
Jan 2013

Try well over 20kms, depending on your chosen munitions. Of course, your rate of fire would be kind of slow by yourself.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
30. Been a long time since I was in an artillery unit..
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 09:17 PM
Jan 2013

We practiced on an old car about 5 miles away as I recall. Add 300 and fire for effect. But that was at Ft Sill, OK about 1967.

GP6971

(31,133 posts)
43. There were a lot of posts I wanted to avoid
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 11:11 PM
Jan 2013

Sill was one of them. There are only two left on my list of the many posts I wanted to avoid.....Sill & Hood. Well, that looks that' going down the tubes, at least for Hood......my son is on orders to the 3rd ACR

TexasPaganDem

(42 posts)
44. This guy is selling one.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jan 2013
http://www.cannonsuperstore.com/m1918.html

It even states that it's an antique that doesn't require registration or transfer tax. The barrel plug just keeps out contaminates, just remove and it's ready to go.

Can be yours for only $18K.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
46. The breech block is missing.
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 12:03 AM
Jan 2013

The third picture shows that both the breech block and it's mounting have been removed.
It has been de-milled.(demilitarized)

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
49. This 90mm T8 is/was for sale
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 12:28 AM
Jan 2013


The gun is from WW2, the ammo is cast solid shot, no explosives. What you are seeing is kinetic energy from the solid shot.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
45. An operating howitzer is considered a Destructive Device
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 11:31 PM
Jan 2013

The National Firearms Act of 1934 would class your howitzer under both provisions of the Destructive Device clause:

The piece itself is over 12.7mm.

And the rounds it fires are considered to be bombs.

So no...if you don't weld the breech of your howitzer shut, you can't have one.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
54. Surely the FF pondered that.
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 02:19 AM
Jan 2013

And decided it was okay because they didn't place any limitations in the 2nd Amendment on who can own what or how many. Anything goes, baby!

Personal nukes for everybody!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it possible to buy a 1...