Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:09 PM Jan 2013

While Department of Justice Let Financial Criminals Go Free, They Pursued Aaron Swartz to Death

While Department of Justice Let Financial Criminals Go Free, They Pursued Aaron Swartz to Death
By Mark Karlin
BuzzFlash at Truthout

Tuesday 15 January 2013

The status quo managerial elite – consisting of the political and financial masters of the universe – cannot tolerate progressive advocacy that threatens to redistribute power or wealth. That is why police across the nation were instructed to crush the Occupy Movement, to pummel it into dust as a public occupation of space – and more importantly to remove its message of grassroots power and wealth redistribution from the headlines of the media.

Those in the driver's seat of the nation fear empowering activism such as Occupy, as if it were a virulent contagion that might rapidly spread across the population and infect the public with "dangerous" ideas of financial and political justice.

Last week, BuzzFlash at Truthout yet again chastised the Department of Justice (DOJ) for giving a get out of jail free card to the moneyed elite. But that applies to the political elite too, who generally are not prosecuted for war crimes, torture, etc. Those in power protect those in power.

But the DOJ appears to have limitless resources to pursue Internet transparency activists such as Aaron Swartz, who committed suicide the other day at the age of 26. The pursuit only stopped with death, as the DOJ, according to The Hill, formally dropped the charges that appeared to be the precipitating factor in Swartz's taking his own life (in what appears to have been a valley of personal depression)...

The rest: http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/17749-while-department-of-justice-lets-financial-criminals-go-free-they-pursued-aaron-swartz-to-death
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
While Department of Justice Let Financial Criminals Go Free, They Pursued Aaron Swartz to Death (Original Post) WilliamPitt Jan 2013 OP
Eric Holder sets the tone. GeorgeGist Jan 2013 #1
the bush agenda marches on, under new management nt msongs Jan 2013 #2
Not sympathetic. Swartz did something he should not have MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #3
What did he do, exactly? EOTE Jan 2013 #5
Exactly.It really doesnt matter if you act legally or not if that action puts the elites in peril.nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #11
It's a crying shame. I saw Chris Hayes' tribute to Swartz, it nearly brought me to tears. EOTE Jan 2013 #13
I believe that "harassment to suicide" is a specific technique to close investigations. rhett o rick Jan 2013 #14
I never thought about that before, but it makes a lot of sense. EOTE Jan 2013 #18
I agree with your very sensible position. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2013 #15
I see what you did there. I bow to your wisdom Autumn Jan 2013 #31
Department of Injustice. Scuba Jan 2013 #4
Are we equally unfairly prosecuting the prosecutor? frazzled Jan 2013 #6
Thanks for bringing that to light. It's important to know the truth no matter where it leads. randome Jan 2013 #10
My understanding is that Justice wanted no time, but MIT would not sign off on that--they wanted msanthrope Jan 2013 #20
You may be right that there is more to this. randome Jan 2013 #28
I am wondering if the plea deal was contingent on him being available to testify. nt msanthrope Jan 2013 #30
Being a defendant in a criminal case is extremely stressful. It would have been JDPriestly Jan 2013 #32
Many of these CEO's dotymed Jan 2013 #33
HSBC banking executives were in business with drug lords for years Vinnie From Indy Jan 2013 #7
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2013 #8
It's repulsive to see. n/t RainDog Jan 2013 #9
You can do something about it here ... MindMover Jan 2013 #12
Don't you just love change! MotherPetrie Jan 2013 #16
He committed suicide over a 4-6 month federal plea? 13 felonies, and the original msanthrope Jan 2013 #17
Securities and Exchange Commission Agony Jan 2013 #19
He did wrong, but more importantly, veganlush Jan 2013 #21
It seems the plutocracy is firmly entrenched in the DOJ. Rex Jan 2013 #22
The surprise is that we are so coalition_unwilling Jan 2013 #23
The Judiciary was my last hope Oilwellian Jan 2013 #24
Not mine. WilliamPitt Jan 2013 #27
I'll say it again CanonRay Jan 2013 #25
kr. and it was because of his political activity. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #26
The first I heard of his death this is just what came arthritisR_US Jan 2013 #29
I thought I read where MIT wanted him to serve time as an example, and that Justice wanted no time bigtree Jan 2013 #34
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
3. Not sympathetic. Swartz did something he should not have
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:18 PM
Jan 2013

unless he had the ready cash to avoid prosecution.

Regards,

Third-Way Manny

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
5. What did he do, exactly?
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jan 2013

Other than downloading large amounts of documents that he had legal access to? That's deserving of the ruthless and relentless hounding and facing of many years in jail? How is that not sick?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. Exactly.It really doesnt matter if you act legally or not if that action puts the elites in peril.nm
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:12 PM
Jan 2013

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
13. It's a crying shame. I saw Chris Hayes' tribute to Swartz, it nearly brought me to tears.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jan 2013

It sickens me to think of how many more things like this are going on that I have no idea of.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
14. I believe that "harassment to suicide" is a specific technique to close investigations.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:34 PM
Jan 2013

Remember Bruce E. Ivins who was one of the nation's top bio-defense researchers that died in Maryland from an apparent suicide, just as the Justice Department was about to file criminal charges against him in the anthrax mailing assaults of 2001 that killed five. He was harassed for years. No trial, no dirty laundry get exposed.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
18. I never thought about that before, but it makes a lot of sense.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:50 PM
Jan 2013

I also followed the trial of Dr. Ivins, was horrified at his treatment and utterly convinced of his innocence. I never thought that such treatment would be systemic, but I'm beginning to think better. The priorities of our DoJ in this country are abhorrent. Truly disgusting.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
6. Are we equally unfairly prosecuting the prosecutor?
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:27 PM
Jan 2013

There may be a certain amount of hyperbole in these accounts. According to yesterday's Boston Globe:

In the most recent plea negotiations, Swartz’s lawyer said Monday, the office of US Attorney Carmen Ortiz remained insistent on prison time of four to six months, far less than the 35 years and $1 million fine allowed under federal law but more than Swartz was willing to accept.

http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/14/mit-hacking-case-lawyer-says-aaron-swartz-was-offered-plea-deal-six-months-behind-bars/l8Cq70KJXNWwdKlF1V0yoJ/story.html


Lots of things probably entered into the suicide: his openly admitted bouts of depression, MIT's intransigence, etc. I'm not sure an offer of 4-6 months (in a case the latest defense attorney said they'd win) is generally cause for suicide. I don't think charges of prosecutorial harrassment should be met with harrassment of the prosecutors. There are a lot of things about this that bother me, but I won't go into them here. (Disclosure: I am neither a prosecutor nor a lawyer.)
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. Thanks for bringing that to light. It's important to know the truth no matter where it leads.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jan 2013

This is not meant as supporting the Department of Justice nor MIT. They should not have gone to the trouble of pursuing this.

But sometimes a confluence of events leads to tragedy.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
20. My understanding is that Justice wanted no time, but MIT would not sign off on that--they wanted
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:52 PM
Jan 2013

some time, as a deterrent to other students. 4-6 months on a federal plea? Jeebus...they would have put him in Devens at the worst.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
28. You may be right that there is more to this.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:09 PM
Jan 2013

Swartz could have come out of this even more of an inspiration to the world. Whatever deep-rooted demons drove him to suicide were probably not known to anyone but himself.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
32. Being a defendant in a criminal case is extremely stressful. It would have been
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 08:04 PM
Jan 2013

especially stressful for him because he stated that he believed he was doing the right thing.

What "deep-rooted demons" have driven our Justice Department to let the owners and CEOs of mortgage companies and the big Wall Street banks who brought our economy down with their greed, lawlessness and stupidity?

Seems to me we would do well to ask that of our Justice Department.

As I have said so many times on DU, our bankers kept giving loans, never alerting our leaders to the simple fact that housing prices were rising at rates far higher than wages or savings.

Bankers are responsible for the job they do.

If a truck-driver negligently runs into a car and kills a passenger, the truck-driver is held responsible. He will probably lose his job or be put on notice that he could lose his job, and he might even face criminal charges for manslaughter depending on the facts.

How is it possible that our Justice Department allows the same Wall Street CEOs whose "deep-rooted" greed brought down our economy to continue without even explaining to us what they did wrong? Why are they allowed to proceed? Why were they bailed out? Why are they still running our banks, mortgage companies (those that survived) and Wall Street?

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
7. HSBC banking executives were in business with drug lords for years
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 04:29 PM
Jan 2013

and have the blood of tens of thousands of murdered people on their hands. The DOJ cut these bankers a deal that only partially restricted their yearly bonuses and indicted not a one of them on criminal charges.

You can bet that not one major media outlet will ask the DOJ about why HSBC executives walk free and Swartz was hounded to his death.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. He committed suicide over a 4-6 month federal plea? 13 felonies, and the original
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jan 2013

sentence rec by Justice was no time, but when MIT would not sign off on it, he was offered a 4-6 month plea?

I suspect there's more to what Mr. Swartz was eventually facing.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
19. Securities and Exchange Commission
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:52 PM
Jan 2013

Securities Act of 1933

Often referred to as the "truth in securities" law, the Securities Act of 1933 has two basic objectives:

•require that investors receive financial and other significant information concerning securities being offered for public sale; and

•prohibit deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities.

Where IS the DOJ?

veganlush

(2,049 posts)
21. He did wrong, but more importantly,
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:53 PM
Jan 2013

It's just wrong to assign blame for a suicide on those who enforce the laws

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
22. It seems the plutocracy is firmly entrenched in the DOJ.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:00 PM
Jan 2013

The DOJ wants to become an entity answerable to itself alone.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
23. The surprise is that we are so
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:00 PM
Jan 2013

surprised. This is, after all, a nation where the 6 Walmart heirs control as much wealth between them as the bottom 30 million Americans combined. (Consider that stat for a moment. Savor it slowly for proof of how obscene Amerikkka has become.) Meanwhile, 1 in 5 American children lives in poverty and 1 in 6 experiences at least one episode per month of food insecurity (aka 'HUNGER').

This country may have once been mankind's 'last, best hope' back when A. Lincoln uttered the words in his 1862 Address to Congress. But I don't think anyone can seriously make that claim any longer.

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
25. I'll say it again
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:04 PM
Jan 2013

Eric Holder is the worst Attorney General ever appointed under a Democratic President. And, IMHO, worse than most appointed by Republicans.

arthritisR_US

(7,287 posts)
29. The first I heard of his death this is just what came
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 06:13 PM
Jan 2013

to my mind! How freaking unjust the justice system is, they have blood on their hands. The thought of the fat cats walking free makes me sick.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»While Department of Justi...