Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:48 PM Jan 2013

An interesting thing about Gubernatorial recalls in America--

There have been 3 attempts: Lynn Frazier in North Dakota in 1921, Gray Davis in 2003, and Scott Walker in 2011. The first 2 succeeded, and the last one failed.

What hit me recently was that in every case, the outcomes were the ones supported by the predatory business interests.

Because I'm both lazy & somewhat pressed for time, I'm just cutting & pasting some relevant information from Wikipedia about these political events. I'm also providing less background on the Walker debacle because that's still so fresh in everyone's memory.

Lynn Frazier

Frazier was extremely popular and implemented several reforms such as the establishment of the Bank of North Dakota and the North Dakota Mill and Elevator. He was re-elected twice, in 1918 and 1920, but an economic depression hit the agricultural sector during his third term and resulted in a private-business-led grassroots movement to press for his recall. The movement succeeded, and in 1921 the governor was the first to be successfully removed from office.

Bank of North Dakota

Though initially conceived by populists in the Non-Partisan League as a credit union-style institution to free the farmers of the state from predatory lenders, the bank's functions were largely neutered by the time of its inception by the business-backed Independent Voters Association. The recall of NPL Governor Lynn Frazier effectively ended the initial plan, with BND taking a more conservative central banking role in state finance. The current president and CEO is Eric Hardmeyer, however the bank is managed by the North Dakota Industrial Commission, which is composed of the Governor, Attorney General, and the Agriculture Commissioner (formerly the Agriculture and Labor Commissioner) of North Dakota.[4]

The North Dakota Mill and Elevator Association started operations on October 22, 1922. The facility was built by the state as a way of bypassing what many area wheat farmers considered unfair business practices on the part of the railroads and milling facilities inMinneapolis, Minnesota.
In the early 1900s, the flour mills and grain exchange in Minneapolis were the primary wheat markets for North Dakotan farmers and elevators. After freight costs to Minneapolis were deducted from Minneapolis market prices, North Dakotan farmers received a low price for their wheat. The North Dakota Mill came into existence to help solve this problem.
The North Dakota Mill facilities include seven milling units, a terminal elevator and a packing warehouse to prepare bagged products for shipment. The Mill's offerings include not only flour, but also newer products like bread machine mixes, pancake mixes, and organic wheat products.


Gray Davis

During his time as Governor, Davis made education his top priority and California spent eight billion dollars more than was required underProposition 98 during his first term. Under Davis, California standardized test scores increased for five straight years.[3] Davis signed the nation's first state law requiring automakers to limit auto emissions. Davis supported laws to ban assault weapons. He is also credited with improving relations between California and Mexico.[4]Davis began his tenure as Governor with strong approval ratings, but those ratings declined as voters blamed Davis for the California electricity crisis and the California budget crisis that followed the dot-com bubble burst. Voters were also alienated by Davis’ record breaking fundraising efforts and negative campaigning.[5]
On October 7, 2003, he became the second governor to be recalled In American history. Davis was succeeded by Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger on November 17 after the recall election.
California electricity crisis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chronology[1][2][3]
1996 California begins to modify controls on its energy market and takes measures ostensibly to increase competition.
September 23, 1996 The Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act (Assembly Bill 1890) becomes law.[4]
April 1998 Spot market for energy begins operation.
May 2000 Significant rise in energy price.
June 14, 2000 Blackouts affect 97,000 customers in San Francisco Bay area during a heat wave.
August 2000 San Diego Gas & Electric Company files a complaint alleging manipulation of the markets.
January 17–18, 2001 Blackouts affect several hundred thousand customers.
January 17, 2001 Governor Davis declares a state of emergency.
March 19–20, 2001 Blackouts affect 1.5 million customers.
April 2001 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. files for bankruptcy.
May 7–8, 2001 Blackouts affect upwards of 167,000 customers.
September 2001 Energy prices normalize.
December 2001 Following the bankruptcy of Enron, it is alleged that energy prices were manipulated by Enron.
February 2002 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission begins investigation of Enron's involvement.
Winter 2002 The Enron Tapes scandal begins to surface.
November 13, 2003 Governor Davis ends the state of emergency.

The Electricity Crisis

The California electricity crisis, also known as theWestern U.S. Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, was a situation in which Californiahad a shortage of electricity caused by market manipulations, illegal[citation needed] shutdowns of pipelines by Texas energy consortiums, and capped retail electricity prices[5]. The state suffered from multiple large-scaleblackouts, one of the state's largest energy companies collapsed, and the economic fall-out greatly harmed Governor Gray Davis's standing.
Drought, delays in approval of new power plants,[6] and market manipulationdecreased supply. This caused 800% increase in wholesale prices from April 2000 to December 2000.[7] In addition, rolling blackouts adversely affected many businesses dependent upon a reliable supply of electricity, and inconvenienced a large number of retail consumers.
California had an installed generating capacity of 45GW. At the time of the blackouts, demand was 28GW. A demand supply gap was created by energy companies, mainly Enron, to create an artificial shortage. Energy traders took power plants offline for maintenance in days of peak demand to increase the price.[8][9] Traders were thus able to sell power at premium prices, sometimes up to a factor of 20 times its normal value. Because the state government had a cap on retail electricity charges, this market manipulation squeezed the industry's revenue margins, causing the bankruptcy of Pacific Gas and Electric Company(PG&E) and near bankruptcy of Southern California Edison in early 2001.[10]
The financial crisis was possible because of partial deregulation legislation instituted in 1996 by Governor Pete Wilson. Enron took advantage of this deregulation and was involved in economic withholding and inflated price bidding in California's spot markets.[11]
The crisis cost between $40 to $45 billion.[12]


Scott Walker

The record spending total was made possible thanks to the Citizens United U.S. Supreme Court decision — which had the effect of invalidating Wisconsin’s century-old ban on independent expenditures by corporations and unions — and a state law that allows unlimited contributions to the incumbent in recall elections.

The amount spent since November 2011 trounces the state’s previous record of $37.4 million, set during the 2010 gubernatorial campaign.

The election has become a national referendum on the future of public sector unions, which have been a major force within the Democratic Party for decades.

In the first of two debates, Walker vowed to “stand up and take on the powerful special interests,” suggesting that national unions have propped up his Democratic challenger, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett.

While Barrett has received about 26 percent of his $4 million in campaign donations from outside the Badger State, Walker has drawn nearly two-thirds of his $30.5 million contributions from out of state, according to campaign filings released May 29. Walker has outraised Barrett 7 ½ to 1 since late 2011, though Barrett didn’t enter the race until late March.


“It’s big time,” said Mike McCabe, director of the campaign finance watchdog Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, which compiled the numbers. “We have a level of outside interference in this election that the state has never seen before.”





4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An interesting thing about Gubernatorial recalls in America-- (Original Post) Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 OP
Just the modern company store Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #1
The recall process seems to be an instrument for remediating the problem Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #2
Interesting, if not surprising, observation. Scuba Jan 2013 #3
And Wisconsin's was the first recall not initiated by the moneyed interests. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #4

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. The recall process seems to be an instrument for remediating the problem
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:57 PM
Jan 2013

of pesky progressive politicians.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An interesting thing abou...