Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:17 PM Jan 2013

Former U.S. Commander Warns Strike On Iran Would Not End Nuclear Program

By Agence France-Presse
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 17:03 EST

A former US military commander warned Wednesday that a potential US strike against Iran would take weeks and probably only set back the country’s nuclear program by several years.

Admiral William Fallon, the former head of US Central Command which covers the Middle East, said that Iran posed concerns for both the United States and Israel but voiced hope for a diplomatic solution to the nuclear row.

“If the US were to put a full-fledged strike campaign in there, that would probably take several weeks, it could put this program back for several years,” Fallon said at the American Security Project, a research group.

Israel, which has not ruled out military action, has less capability than the United States and would face a more difficult task than in 1981 and 2007 when it secretly bombed nuclear sites in Iraq and Syria, Fallon said.

MORE...

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/16/former-u-s-commander-warns-strike-on-iran-would-not-end-nuclear-program/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former U.S. Commander Warns Strike On Iran Would Not End Nuclear Program (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2013 OP
Ha! Someone has some common sense... judy Jan 2013 #1
Hard to eliminate a nuclear program that isn't there, MadHound Jan 2013 #2
Lest we forget... Purveyor Jan 2013 #3

judy

(1,942 posts)
1. Ha! Someone has some common sense...
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:21 PM
Jan 2013

It would actually accelerate nuclear programs in any part of the world that can afford it.
Nothing is solved by bombing.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
2. Hard to eliminate a nuclear program that isn't there,
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jan 2013

But that doesn't mean that some country, some politician, won't try to do exactly that, and drag us all into WWIII in the process.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former U.S. Commander War...