never mind, I'm not sure about this

[Enrique]

Last edited Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:59 PM - Edit history (1)

it's confusing, but it seems it's not exactly the same thing, so disregard.

[Skinner]

1. Fiction or not...

...President Obama effectively cast himself as the slayer of stupid regulations. Which will come in handy when he fights to keep good regulations.

I guess it's a bonus that he didn't have to end any actual regulations to do it.

[Enrique]

2. what is it with Obama and GOP spill myths?

the people who said this whopper: some of the worst Republicans, plus Barack Obama.

&feature=player_embedded

[cthulu2016]

3. Yup... no possible downside to increasing the credibility of RW liars.

None whatsoever.

[Enrique]

5. and disrespecting his own subordinates

Lisa Jackson, and also Tom Vilsack:

http://blogs.usda.gov/2011/08/19/separating-fact-from-fiction-on-obama-administration%E2%80%99s-farm-policies/#more-34999

Sadly, rumors and misconceptions have become the norm, not the exception, especially when it comes to regulations and the Obama administration’s work on agriculture. First, it was that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was considering treating spilled milk like an oil spill. Not true. In terms of water regulations, EPA has made it clear that recent rules do not seek to regulate land that occasionally ponds during heavy rains.

[LiberalFighter]

6. If they were to regulate land that ponds during heavy rains...

They would be spending a lot of time in my neighbor's 1/3 acre backyard behind my property.

[DevonRex]

4. I heard dry sarcasm when he talked about it.

For those of us with some common sense. For the others, well now they know he's against stupid regulations. As we all are. We are for good regulations.