General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExtremely disturbed individual passes background check and buys arsenal of guns despite past murder
Article by: PAUL MCENROE and GLENN HOWATT , Star Tribune staff writers Updated: January 20, 2013 - 7:33 AM
They knew the Delano house far too well. It was where Christian Philip Oberender, then 14 years old, had murdered his mother in a shotgun ambush in the family rec room in 1995.
Now, 18 years later, Carver County Sheriff Jim Olson was sending his deputies back to the home where Oberender still lives. Just two days earlier, Olson had scanned the day's shift reports and froze when he tripped over Oberender's name. A scan of a Facebook page then showed firearms spread out like a child's trophies on a bed inside the home, along with notes about the Newtown, Conn., gunman who shot 20 children to death.
snip
Even more disturbing was the letter Oberender had written recently to his late mother, Mary: "I am so homicide,'' it said in broken sentences. "I think about killing all the time. The monster want out. He only been out one time and someone die.''
snip
Even though Oberender killed his mother with a firearm, even though he was committed to the state hospital in St. Peter as mentally ill and dangerous more than a decade ago, he was able to obtain a permit to purchase firearms last May. That piece of paper gave Oberender, now 32, the ability to walk into any licensed Minnesota retailer and buy any assault weapon or pistol on the rack.
http://www.startribune.com/local/west/187610601.html?clmob=y&c=n&refer=y
This is one of the "responsible gun owners" that is able to obtain a permit thanks to the NRA standing in the way of any effective gun legislation.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)and/or the state failed to report his conviction to NICS.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)By not enforcing current laws.
Yet some want to create even more laws...even though we don't enforce the ones we have already.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)If this guy had to provide that he would have never passed the background check. The current law can not be enforced if we don't even have a proper system in place to enforce it, the law needs to be changed to allow a background check system that actually works.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Rather than passing a flurry of new ones that won't be enforced either.
That's all I'm saying.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)he would never have received a permit in the first place.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 20, 2013, 12:20 PM - Edit history (1)
If you read the article it says some of the limitations to the system, you have to submit fingerprints and a Social Security Number to become a teacher in this state but you don't have to do so to buy guns. Under current law police only have seven days to object to a permit application, if it takes more than seven days the applicant is automatically granted a permit.
The problem is not that the current laws were not enforced, the problem is the current laws make it far too easy for people to slip through the cracks.
B2G
(9,766 posts)"How did Christian Oberender succeed in obtaining a gun permit?
The answer lies in a combination of deceit on his part, failures in the state court system, and haphazard data collection by state agencies, according to interviews with law enforcement officials."
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The current background check laws are too weak, we need new laws that actually have teeth.
B2G
(9,766 posts)I'm of the opinion it's a combination of both.
If laws are to be enforced, *someone* has to enforce them. Do we have adequate resources to enforce the ones we already have? Time and again, we hear that 'someone slipped through the cracks', someone should never acquired a permit in the first place, that a background check 'should have caught this'.
Is anyone even asking that question?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)I do support the concept of a voluntary Firearms Owner ID (FOID). Get it ahead of time and there would be no waiting period since the check would already be done.
The SSN limitation is actually imbedded in Federal law for many things.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The problem is not "too many laws", it's that the laws are written by the NRA, in a fashion meant to have more loopholes than the tax code.
blm
(113,040 posts)Gun sellers don't kill people, gun buyers kill people.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)That means they should stop engineering it such that BATF has no head and fewer agents than it did 35 years ago. They should stop making it difficult for states to keep databases and enforce existing laws. I'm all for STRICT enforcement of current laws, so long as the gun nut assholes who preach that as a mantra actually ALLOW and enable the laws to be enforced, rather than stifling them at every opportunity. Why don't we have an actual, sitting BATF head? Why? Anyone who preaches "Enforce existing laws" needs to be able to answer this question clearly and honestly.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Does a crime committed at 14 count against somebody for the rest of their life, or not? We never seem to know what to say about that.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)society is ambivalent on how to deal with juvenile offenders.
I'm surprised that isn't obvious to you.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Where do you stand on this?
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Even if they murder someone as a minor they should lose their gun rights permanently. I have mixed feelings on how long the sentence should be for minors who murder, but there are no mixed feelings when it comes to gun ownership. If you murder you should never be able to touch a gun again. Period. That is not a harsh penalty or a longer sentence, it is a common sense public safety measure. People don't need guns, guns do not make people safer and those of us who don't own guns are less likely to be killed as a result of gun violence than those who do.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)information flow and prosecution of the prohibited who knowing attempt to obtain a firearm through an FFL.
Heck even the NRA agrees with that.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)- The NRA
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I'm wondering how the police become aware of the guy's facebook page?
I read the article and scanned through it a second time but somehow missed that.
Was it his shooting buddy that reported this?
farminator3000
(2,117 posts)Last week, investigators also learned that Oberender's juvenile record -- where the murder of his mother is recorded -- had not been attached to his criminal history at the BCA. Carver investigators are still puzzled over that.
In a statement, BCA spokesperson Jill Oliveira said, "There were no data submitted to the BCA about this individual; without it there can be no record."
Loopholes
The state's criminal background system appears to contain another loophole for violent felons and persons found mentally ill and dangerous who want to escape scrutiny. Under state law, a person's juvenile record is deleted from the BCA's database when the individual turns 28 unless a judge says otherwise, Oliveira said. As a result, a person with a violent juvenile record -- like Oberender -- might still qualify to buy a gun if there were no felonies on his adult record.
State law requires the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) to provide local law enforcement agencies with records of people who have been committed to institutional care for mental illness, if the applicant gives consent. But in general, the BCA said, a court order for civil commitment is classified as private data and is not available to the BCA.
"There is no way that BCA can have DHS's commitment data,'' Oliveira said in a statement. In addition, about half of those committed by a court are directed to community providers, not state facilities, thus leaving it to the courts, not DHS, to ensure that the records are sent.
It's unclear whether Oberender's mental health history was ever entered into any background check database.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)farminator3000
(2,117 posts)you can't really call drunk driving laws 'conservative'
annabanana
(52,791 posts)a level that it will be ABLE to enforce the laws on the books, right?
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)You do make a great point however, everyone who says the existing laws need to be enforced needs to be willing to provide funding to enforce them. Every time an NRA type goes on about enforcing the existing laws they should be asked if they support increased funding for the ATF.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)That was a cluster fuck.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 20, 2013, 02:55 PM - Edit history (1)
, not a the Federal level.
Regarding your comment about providing a SSN, Oberender should have been required to provide a driver's license or some other form of government issued photo id to purchase any of the firearms he acquired.
There are plenty of state and Federal laws on the books that prevent criminals and those involuntarily committed from purchasing guns. In this case the state of MN failed it's citizens.
dkf
(37,305 posts)You can't tell me this is the only situation where we have seen complete incompetence in enforcement. And the irony is all the record keeping gaps are at some government entity whether it is at the state or federal level.
Plain old competence is missing and it puts us in danger.
dkf
(37,305 posts)"I think about killing all the time,'' Oberender wrote. "Why god do I feel like this? The monster want to hurt people. Guns are too fast. The monster want it to be slow and painful. There is so much pain in my heart and soul. Me want other to feel it."
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)My brother was at one time a very scary person, but now that the doctors found a medication that works for him he is one of the most loving and accepting people you will ever meet. There is no cure for schizophrenia so if he were ever to go off his medication things could get scary again.
I don't know the medical history of the person in the article, but it is very likely his mental illness has not been properly treated since he was released. If he did receive proper treatment he could very likely live a better life and pose no threat to anyone.
Even so however I would never want him owning guns, he may be safe if he is medicated but no medication will cure his illness so if he were ever to go off his meds he would need to be prevented from getting a gun.
farminator3000
(2,117 posts)The handgun found next to William Spengler Jr. after he fatally shot two firefighters on Christmas Eve was manufactured by Smith & Wesson and sold in 1973 to a firearms dealer in Tennessee.
Later, that dealer shut down. Its records, apparently destroyed, are nowhere to be found.
Through what they describe as a stroke of luck, federal agents have located someone else who once had possession of the .38-caliber revolver. Now, they are trying to determine how the gun moved from there to Spengler.
The investigation continues, largely because it would be a crime if someone gave or sold the gun to Spengler. Spengler, a felon who served 17 years in prison for bludgeoning his grandmother to death with a hammer, could not legally own a firearm.
Were committed to finding out how exactly those guns got to him, said Scott Heagney, who heads the Rochester region office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or ATF.
-skip-
In an era of rampant technology, federal agents find themselves hamstrung by limitations on gun registration information. Their investigative techniques harken to a past era, when they sometimes have to sift through thousands of paper records in search of information about a particular firearm.
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20130120/NEWS01/301200015/1002/RSS01