Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:00 PM Jan 2013

The Most Radioactive Fish Yet From Fukushima

by Tyler Durden on 01/19/2013 12:20 -0500



Almost two years after the awful nuclear disaster occurred, a fish caught near Fukushima on Friday January 18th had a record-breaking level of radioactive contamination over 2500x the legal limit. TEPCO measured 'Mike the Murasoi' at 254,000 becquerels per kilogram (with the limit for edible seafood at 100 becquerels). As Le Monde reports, the previous record (caught on August 21st 2012) was a mere 25,800 becquerels/kg. As further precautions, TEPCO is installing new nets 20km around the Fukushima Daichi site to avoid highly contaminated fish gettig too far and being consumed by other species. While Mike's family are no doubt distraught (at him being caught and being so radioactive), it appears (somewhat disappointingly) that there is no apparent third eye, lazer fins, legs, or other 'expected' 'blinky' malformations.



Mike - the slightly crispy looking Marusoi...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-19/meet-mike-most-radioactive-fish-ever-fukushima

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

moondust

(19,959 posts)
3. I've wondered about the salmon.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:06 PM
Jan 2013

I read someplace that sockeye have long-range migration patterns. I would hope that the government has stepped up its testing of seafood since Fukushima.

Relevant info

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
4. I'd just about be willing to bet you could find worse in the Columbia River
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:12 PM
Jan 2013

The Hanford Reservation (nuclear weapons materials production plant left over from WW-II and the Cold War) being the culprit.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
6. Conveniently, our gov. does not bother to test fish or water or much else for radiation.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 06:41 PM
Jan 2013

And in fact stopped testing on the West Coast for Fukishima fall out just a few months after the initial problems became known.

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
9. Yes, indeed, very convenient. I wonder what the reactive time in resulting disease/cancer might be.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jan 2013

I have a funny feeling we may learn this along the way.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
8. I was of the impression that it takes a generation or 2 to get an idea of any side effects?
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:31 PM
Jan 2013

Wouldn't Mike's kids or grand kids have an internal or external deformity or disease.

What about Mrs. Mike? If her highly radioactive eggs and were fertilized by Mr. Mike's highly radioactive sperm. Then what? 3 eyed glo-fish children?




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Most Radioactive Fish...