A little help here please: How do you interpret this graphic?

[patrice]

Thanks for your help!

[NMDemDist2]

1. Paul supporters spanking other Repukes is my read n/t

[patrice]

3. It was posted by the Occupy on Face Book. What do you make of that?

[OneGrassRoot]

5. Which Occupy?

Seems there's a gazillion now.

[patrice]

11. Well, it's one of the older ones, the first that I subscribed to on FB. Point, though, thanks. nt

[jberryhill]

8. There is no shortage of Paulistas in Occupy

[NutmegYankee]

2. I read it as Paulites attacking establishment republicans.

I love to see them fight each other.

[OneGrassRoot]

4. Libertarians

The libertarians who are ill informed about this current gun control debate are feeding the lies about guns being taken away by Obama, sharing graphics like this one. They're saying Ron Paul wouldn't have allowed that and that all conservatives should have voted for Ron Paul.

[nadinbrzezinski]

6. If Paul was elected POTUS there would not be an atrack

On the second Ammendment.

My Paulese to English Decoder ring at work.

[bluerum]

10. I think so.

[FSogol]

7. A poster, admonishing repubs for not voting for Ron Paul.

But I suspect you know that. I'd delete this graphic supporting Ron Paul if I were you.

BTW. Fuck Ron Paul

[Cirque du So-What]

9. Offhand, I'd say...

it's chastisement of all those repugs who gave the nomination to Mitt der Shitt instead of Ron Paul - as if that Randian nutter could have won against President Obama. It's an appeal to all the 2A nutjobs to vote for a *real* nutjob next time.

[TheCowsCameHome]

12. Lovely family photo of life's losers that has been "tagged"

[graham4anything]

13. Seems like an appeal from the John Birch Society, of which Ron Paul owes allegiance to

I don't see any minority in that picture either
nor do I think this is any version of OWS as 99% look like angry old white guys that make up the tealibertarianrepublican party

I also see just two women, but many more bald heads

maybe they are doling out $$$ to pay Ron Paul the 50,000 a speech he is giving now
and want his racist son to be president

[patrice]

16. It's an Occupy that I have been tolerating on FB, even though I encountered one of the most

personally vicious persons I have ever EVER met, in association with that group.

I have been watching this Occupy and reading their Glenn Greenwald stuff, trying to credit their point of view, but today they cam out full on, against the Green Party, against the U.N., and apparently in support of legislation in the Senate to protect the NRA's Bushmaster markets abroad, which I asked them specifically to disavow and they did not.

You know, it's frustrating, when I want to credit a point, such as the U.N. was started by bankers for bankers, I get my legs knocked out from under me by their attitude about appropriate responses to this situation. And arming people who NEVER stood a chance against those in their own country who would take advantage of them, either as cannon-fodder or as representatives of "law and order", and then bitching about U.S. drones, just does NOT work for me.

Whatever's going on, chaos makes it worse. Whatever is wrong, the American arms industry arming freelance "freedom fighters", who whether they are in fact authentic freedom fighters or not, VERY likely will not see, nor will their posterity see, what they are looking for coming out of violence, especially indiscriminate violence and I don't give a good godamn what Hedges or Greenwald says about that. They should accept the fact that maybe, just maybe, they don't KNOW what they need to know in order to make the kinds of judgements they are making!!!!!!

Those fuckers need to go to these bloody places and take up the arms that they are ever so eager to get into *A*N*Y*O*N*E*'s hands, as long as they badmouth the U.N. & BO.

[graham4anything]

17. if they are actually OWS, they have hijacked it, because I haven't noticed other OWS being pro-gun

the trouble with anonymous protesters is just this
anyone can call themselves anything and who knows the difference?


your other views basically are the same as mine here.

the OWS should be open by name, and all of them run for office (any office) in any state nationwide and if just 10% of 5000 candidates were to win, that is 500 people
Just 1% of candidates is 50. If those 50 are house winners, we can win back the house.

seems a no-brainer.
the anonymous method does not work

I recall after the 2010 townhalls, the so called tea party people claimed these types were not theirs either, deny, deny, they tried, but these gun pros are indeed what the teaparty libertarians want.

and I don't recall OWS being on that side.(I may be wrong though).

[bemildred]

14. You're supposed to feel bad because you didn't vote for Ron P. in the primaries.

Assuming it's supposed to make sense, that would make sense of it. There is still the problem that he would not have been elected, but I don't want to try to carry this "making sense" stuff too far.

[GeorgeGist]

15. Crazies vs losers ...

or vice versa.

[datasuspect]

18. never underestimate the power of scared white people in large numbers

the US is mostly populated by these yahoos.

urban Uhhhhmerica is very small compared to the vast suckhole that is rural, exurban, and suburban Uhhhhhmerica.

[LeftInTX]

19. Alex Jones - Occupy Houston - Occupy the Fed

What can I say?

[Ruby the Liberal]

20. Libertarians with a Ron Paul "told you so" mentality.