General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like Harry Reid just dumped the filibuster
Bernie Sanders on Big Ed - looks like Reid dropped the talking filibuster and the 41 Rule
peacebird
(14,195 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)My bad. What does this mean?
panader0
(25,816 posts)Autumn
(45,012 posts)montanacowboy
(6,081 posts)Sanders says he doesn't know unless he does not have the 51 votes
jillan
(39,451 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,226 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)What's the odds of that happening even if the Democrats work around the filibuster in the Senate. If we get the majority of the House in '14, it might make a difference. But it makes no difference right now.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)the idea was to remove silent holds and move the confirmation process along.
starroute
(12,977 posts)If the GOP can exercise a veto over any Supreme Court replacements for the next four years, that's a big difference.
If the GOP can keep ATF from having anyone to run it for the next four years, that's a big difference.
If the GOP can stop the next Elizabeth Warren from being confirmed, that's a big difference.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)montanacowboy
(6,081 posts)if the filibuster does not get fixed, he just as well might take a 4 year vacation
senseandsensibility
(16,964 posts)motivation here. Does not make sense, and is very disheartening to the base.
Raine
(30,540 posts)ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)if you don't have the votes... you don't have the votes. they have to have a slate of rules...
sP
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)I don't know what's up.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)He said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has suggested a package of more modest reforms to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.). They include proposals to eliminate filibusters on motions to proceed to new business and to speed the process for sending legislation to conference negotiations with the House.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/278815-sen-durbin-democrats-lack-votes-to-pass-talking-filibuster-reform#ixzz2Ir34WMFm
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
I'd like to know the names of the Dems who aren't in support of it. They're basically tying Obama's hands.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)The talking filibuster is an American tradition to bring back. I'm proud of my current senator, Jeff Merkley, and a former senator of mine (Tom Harkin) for trying to restore it. I'm concerned about two other former senators of mine (Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer) for not helping us get this restored. Anyway, here's the list of seven senators and the phone numbers to call now and let them know you want a TALKING FILIBUSTER, NOT the nonsense that will do little to fix the problem that is the "bipartisan" thing being shopped by the corporatists that will continue to have us be uninformed and unrepresented.
Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) DC - 202-224-3553
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) - 202-224-4242
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) - 202-224-3841
Carl Levin (D-Mich.) - 202-224-6221
Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) - 202-224-2353
Max Baucus (D-Mont.) - 202-224-2651
Jack Reed (D-R.I.) - 202-224-4642
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251279394
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)They didn't want to reform it. Period.
kentuck
(111,069 posts)That is what a leader is supposed to do. Now we have to put up with 4 more years of their bullshit?
leftstreet
(36,102 posts)catbyte
(34,358 posts)Fuck.