General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums27 years ago today .... The Challenger Explosion .... thanx to St. Ronald Reagan
The White House put pressure on NASA to get the Challenger up so
Reagan could talk about having a "teacher in space" during his
State of the Union address.
It was so cold that morning that many NASA people didn't want to
do the lift off until it warmed up. The great physicist Howard Fineman
showed that the O-rings shrink in cold temps and that is what caused
the explosion.
winterpark
(168 posts)working at KSC since the 80's and she gave me the whole lowdown. She said the whole crew of engineers, etc tried to stop the launch because of the O-ring and they were shut down. It was a completely avoidable tragedy in order for reagan to put a feather in his cap. And because those at the top claimed they didn't know (when they did) they put in place whistleblower protections in place so that someone who knows of a problem and their immediate supervisor didn't listen, they could bring concerns to another department head
Botany
(70,447 posts).... to NASA prior to the launch of the Challenger and the whole thing
was swept under the rug and America was told about St. Ronnie's
wonderful speech about the tragedy.
The crew of the space shuttle Challenger honoured us by the manner in which they lived their lives. We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for the journey and waved goodbye and 'slipped the surly bonds of earth' to 'touch the face of God.'
Thank you.
President Ronald Reagan - January 28, 1986
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)What you relate about NASA knowing better than to launch and their consensus being over-ridden is not in dispute historically. WHY the White House made thedecision to launch is the area where the truth needs to be revealed still, it seems.
longship
(40,416 posts)I was 100% guessing on the spelling
Dollface
(1,590 posts)Someone has been watching MSNBC
Botany
(70,447 posts).... so why quibble about surnames and spelling?
yardwork
(61,539 posts)caraher
(6,278 posts)I sure as hell would fix that!!!
It's an insult to a great physicist
Botany
(70,447 posts).... by my slip. BTW I read his book "Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman!"
years ago and from what I gathered about him I doubt that somebody
getting his name Richard Feynman, mixed up w/ Howard Fineman wouldn't have
given him a minute of worry. Matter of fact good chance he would find that
goof funny and attribute it to the fact neural pathways which are used more often
tend to fire quicker and sometimes the end product is wrong.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Botany
(70,447 posts).... from now on I will try to live my live in order to keep you happy.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)"I believe that has some significance (pause of disgust) for our problem."
adieu
(1,009 posts)Maybe there's another physicist named Howard Fineman.
lastlib
(23,163 posts)w/ Ed, Lawrence, et al.
Phentex
(16,330 posts)So many kids were watching because of McAuliffe and I can still see the explosion fresh in my mind. It is not something you can forget! I remember thinking what just happened? What just happened?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)It was my Kennedy moment I guess.
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)It scared the hell out of me and I remember my grandma, who lived with us, having to deal with my very distraught young self.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)I guess it was a big impact on our generation? It was a very sad moment. I remember going to lunch later on and we all talked about why they died.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)but we didn't watch that launch in class for some reason...I remember them showing us some earlier ones, and I definitely remember stopping class to watch the first post-Challenger launch (I was in a different school by then...)
geomon666
(7,512 posts)Same here.
glowing
(12,233 posts)It was a big deal. We had a contest in the state thru the school to name the space shuttle. And one of my teachers was the runner up. He was 2nd in place of the teacher that went. I think he didn't get it because he was also a member of the VT legislation and it might appear as if he was favored for political reasons.
Those were the years I dreamed of being an astronaut. I wanted to go up into space so very badly. Had my own telescope and star charts and planet posters all over my bedroom. Even then I knew I wanted to be in science. I switched thinking and gears to marine biology. Actually go a degree and everything, alas, graduated thinking Al Gore would make science and technology a primary focus and spending initiative. Ended up with Bush and cuts and a war. I work at a hotel now. So many people wasting away in jobs they aren't best suited for making the world a better and "cooler" place to live for ourselves and our children's future.
The Bush years sure seem like a lost decade and Obama is barely able to crack the surface of what we should be doing and know we should be doing to move forward because of the backwards jackasses called republicans and Dino's protecting old school bs wealthy asshats who use money and power to protect their Franken-foods and oils gold and their polluting ways.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Ian Iam
(386 posts)Lebam in LA
(1,344 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)But, 1.8 billion is a lot of persuasion.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)....notifications of copyright infringement."
Hmmmm!!!!!
Ian Iam
(386 posts)Perhaps you might try
Please let me know if this link works for you.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)Thanx!
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Botany
(70,447 posts)He ran up deficits, raised taxes, increased the # of White House employees
to record levels, cut deals w/Iran, hid money in Swiss Bank Accounts in order
to fund an illegal war against peasants in Central America, had record #s
indicted and sent to jail, got a bunch of Marines killed in Lebanon after which
he invaded Granada in order to change the subject, and he Alzheimer's for the
final 2 years in office (at least) but the image of St. Ronnie who beat the commies
lives on and on.
R Merm
(405 posts)that included a staged photo of Raygun pretending to cry upon news of the explosion. I found this disgusting, as a young Engineer with a Solid Fuel Rocket Motor Manufacture at the time I was convinced of the OP conclusions.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Joseph Trento explains the back story -- Nixon the hater of all things JFK also played a major part in the disaster by authorizing NASA with only sufficient funds to build a Shuttle that used solid-rocket motors. The original plans were for the shuttle to have a liquid-fueled and manned booster that could be flown to a soft landing after helping get the orbiter off the ground. In addition to being safer for the crews, the manned booster would not leave a toxic trail of rocket propellant that courses through our veins.
Thank you for reminding us of this tragic and avoidable anniversary, Botany.
caraher
(6,278 posts)There were plenty of good Democrats who opposed the program, Walter Mondale prominent among them.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Good reading!
adieu
(1,009 posts)to the Shuttle because it was more of a media glitz than a real scientific experiment base. There's really no reason to put humans up 80, 100 miles in space. It's too close to earth to learn of interplanetary effects on humans, as well as for other astronomical experiments and testing.
Many scientists thought that the money used for the shuttle program could have gone into better use in space research.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)NASA spends too much on manned missions, especially ones with limited use. I'd personally like to see NASA do more with unmanned exploration then, say, to try to land people on Mars.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The Pentagon wanted a shuttle with an enormous payload bay for two reasons: So they could use it to launch Keyhole spy satellites, which were as big as the Hubble, and the real unstated Cold War reason - that payload bay was also a bomb bay, and they wanted the Space Shuttle to be convertible into an orbital bomber.
Because the shuttle was intended to be carrying sensitive military and intelligence payloads, they demanded the Shuttle have a huge downrange reentry capability, which led to the winged design, so the shuttle could in theory take off, and land back at it's point of origin after one orbit.
The result: An enormous shuttle that was bigger than it really should have been, the winged design with those fragile reentry tiles that made the Shuttle insanely difficult and labor-intensive to maintain, huge expenses, for a ship that was pretty dangerous to fly.
If the military had stayed out, the Shuttle may have been a smaller craft, about the size of a business jet, that carries three or four astronauts, and a more modest payload, which would have been cheaper to fly, maybe could have had the manned, liquid-fueled, first-stage to make it safer and more reusable.
caraher
(6,278 posts)That's definitely the biggest factor of all
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)There's another aspect to the sad story of the Space Shuttle: Aerospace analyst G.Harry Stine made a reference to "The Utah Connection," a group of powerful Congressmen from Utah. Utah, is of course, where ATK, formerly Morton-Thiokol, is located.
When the decision was made to forego the development of a flyback booster for the Shuttle, there were quite a few proposals using liquid-fueled boosters; one even used the entire first stage of the Saturn V. There were a number of proven, reliable liquid-fueled rocket engines available, including the F1 from the first stage of the Saturn V. the F1 is still listed as the lowest-cost, pound for pound, liquid fuel rocket engine ever (although SpaceX's Merlin engine may be a challenger for that title!), as well as one of the most reliable.
The reason for sticking those goddam solid-rocket boosters on the Shuttle was more to provide a lucrative contract for ATK/Morton-Thiokol, than economy. Those SRBs were not only the reason for the Challenger disaster; they were a major driver of the Shuttle's high cost. One study pointed out that the SRBs required about 6,000 'man-hours' to stack the various segments for each Shuttle launch; that's before considering the labor costs of recovery, refurbishment and transport.
I followed the development of the Space Shuttle from the earliest days (Yeah, I'm a space geek!). I saw a number of 'viewgraph engineering' designs that would replace the SRBs with liquid-fueled boosters. Apollo 11 astronaut Edwin Buzz Aldrin came up with a very workable concept for a flyback booster called the Starbooster, which would replace SRB's for the Shuttle and any follow-on vehicles.
NASA Shuttle managers, as well as ATK/Morton-Thiokol's supporters in Congress, have made certain that every proposal for a follow-on launcher include SRBs. That includes the 'single-stick' SRB design for the Ares which is supposed to be the launcher for NASA's person-carrying Orion capsule.
This is why I'm such a big supporter of SpaceX, it's Falcon series rockets and Dragon spacecraft. They're all liquid-fuel designs using SpaceX's simple, reliable Merlin engines, which I see as the closest thing to the Saturn family of reliable rocket engines from the 60s.
By the way, did you ever wonder what happened to the plans for the Saturn V and it's engines? So do a lot of people. After the Challenger disaster, someone proposed a launcher based on Saturn V engines, the F! and the hydrogen fueled J2. It was to be called the 'Jarvis,' as a tribute to Gregory Jarvis, who died aboard Challenger. Big problem: the plans for those engines no longer exist.
Grantuspeace
(873 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)We got sent home. I was in tears as I opened the door to my apartment. Henry - my soon to be adoptive father was home that day. He had no idea what happened (as this was before the internet and 24 hour cable news) but he could tell something bad had happened based on my state of being.
I had wanted to be an astronaut up until that point. Now my dreams were crushed.
My teacher, Mr. Fulton was able to get Buzz Aldrin to come visit after the disaster to speak to us. Meeting a real life astronaut was pretty cool, and I renewed my vow to become an astronaut when I grew up.
It was a very special episode in my life.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)explosion of the Challenger.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)So sad, still chokes me up thinking about it.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)the launch (which I hadn't done for a while) from the other room. Right as the countdown ended I dashed into the living room to watch. When it blew up, the newscasters were babbling about how there was a problem so the shuttle would have to circle around and land somewhere. I just stood there, gape-mouthed, mumbling to myself, "You idiots, they're ALL DEAD." The parts trailed smoke in various directions and the camera stayed on the jumbled mess for what seemed like forever.
I knew they were all dead as soon as I saw it had blown up. I was stunned for days. To stand there and actually see it live as it happened was just BAD.
lpbk2713
(42,740 posts)A co-worker and I knew as soon as we saw that fleur de lis that it had gone horribly wrong.
Several good lives were sacrificed that day to promote Runny RayGun's bread an circuses.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)This only makes us look like the same Republican crackpots who blame everything on Obama.
If you read details about what was going on with Boisjoly in Utah the few hours before the go-ahead was given by Thiokol, it becomes apparent that the chain of events that led to this tragedy are way, way more complex than just Reagan wanting to score pride points at his SOTU address that night.
I don't doubt there was some pressure and a few phone calls. But, the horrible decision-making processes at NASA and dickhead launch management was a far greater factor in this than the Whitehouse.
Dictatorial and politicized aerospace management styles and egotistical personalities caused this more than anything else.
adieu
(1,009 posts)I doubt Reagan was on the phone speaking directly with mission control asking them to push the launch button. I'm sure there were plenty of layers between Reagan and the director of the launch. Nonetheless, it was pressured due more to political reasons than for engineering or scientific reasons, you agree?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Now, if you would just back up your cover-up info with some references, sources, names, etc. we can get beyond generalities to broad to discuss, such as "everything".
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)kudzu22
(1,273 posts)Went to tell the rest of the school. We didn't get a lot done that day.
LittleGirl
(8,280 posts)wow. Like yesterday for me. I cried at work.
GatorOrange
(63 posts)While fiscal conservatives and "money better spent on Earth" Democrats like Mondale had some responsibility for what happened with NASA, two Republicans share most of the blame: Nixon and Reagan.
Nixon killed or limited most Apollo application programs in favor of "austerity". SkyLab and other projects were given the short end of the sticks.
NASA wanted to use a crewed liquid fuel resuable rocket... Nixon's administration ruled that as too
expensive. Design and safety compromises were made that bit us in the rear for 30+ years.
Air Force was brought in kicking and screaming to the shuttle program: they wanted next to nothing to do with it. The shuttles large wings were a compromise of the needed lift to reach an abort location for Air Force mission. That abort location: Easter Island. That 6 billion plus shuttle launch complex at Vandenberg? Never used.
Reagan appointed the worst NASA Administrator ever in James Beggs. Militarized NASA and booted out the last of the early era leaders of NASA. Created the unsafe rushed culture that led to that fateful January day.
Then we get to Challenger. Noonan rips off the poem "High Flight" and Reagan has his most memorable domestic speech. The investigation narrows down the causes but fails to change the true culture of the NASA higher ups. Freedom Space Station becomes a black hole for contractors. And the Nixonian Deathtrap Shuttle keeps flying.
Just an ignored tragedy. NASA systematicly ruined by two of the GOP's "finest".
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)My family was taking a January vacation through Florida. We saw it go up around Lake Monroe on the Volusia/Seminole county line and pulled over. Having never seen a shuttle launch before, we didn't think the sudden division of the contrails to be that unsual when we saw it. It wasn't until we got back in the car and turned on the radio that we learned what had happened.
We later stopped for lunch at McDonald's nearby, and the silence in the place was eirie.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,516 posts)to deposit a paycheck. People out on the street were talking about it to strangers, etc. After I was done at the bank and ran back to work, I had the radio on until quitting time. When I got home, I threw a tape in the VCR and started recording - mostly Dan Rather's coverage I believe. Still have the tape, which I need to digitize one of these days.
This was so sad considering that of all times, this flight had the first teacher and there were alot of children following the launch.
I always had issues with having a huge liquid hydrogen tank (along with the liquid oxygen) as propellant. The Hindenberg analogies write themselves.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Ronald Reagan could have talked all he wanted about a teacher in space before the launch, so forget that angle. Actually, don't forget that angle, because it would not be needed if it were not that a really awful reason DOES need to be covered up.
The timing of all this and the "need" to not cancel the launch is most interesting from the Central America perspective, where V-P Bush is committing crimes, giving 100 million dollars of aid to the Contras in violation of the Boland Amendment. This is a few months before the Iran-Contra scandal becomes public, a year before American Ben Linder is assassinated in Nicaragua by the guys Bush covertly funded. If the launch was scrubbed, Bush in Central America would have been the big news focus instead. The Challenger schedule and the decision to not alter it was more likely linked to Central America crimes than Reagan's words. Reagan could say just about the same thing either way, in space or going to be in space in a few days.
The real need of the moment was keeping the Iran-Contra scandal under wraps. There was plenty to keep covered up and away from press focus, the assassination gone wrong in Costa Rica murdered an American journalist, the 10 million dollar mistake by Ollie North to fix, the cocaine connections and the Noriega problem, plus Bush was adding to the litany of crimes in real time. The White House basement crew knew what a horrible position they were in when this decision came down. The Challenger explosion was even better better cover-up/distraction than the launch, and it took until Fall for the story to finally break. Proof of the role of Bush's crimes in the schedule remain unproven.
Today the context of the decision in not so obfuscated that we should believe your fairy tale meme about the State of the Union speech! For those of us involved in this story, in Central America and writing about it then, the underlying relationships and reasons were already as clear as that cold morning in Florida. What was also very clear to journalists by that time that the murder of an American journalist was being covered up along with the illegal support going to Reagan's not-so-secret mercenary army. A couple of days later, this journalist barely survived nine stab wounds, in my view more evidence of the gravity of the story I was penning.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)Will you tell more about that?
It was always Bush. Always.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)I was nearly killed, could have bled out, but survived thanks to people around me helping out very quickly with tourniquet and transport to ER.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Criminal activities that put millions of dollars from selling stolen U.S. arms in a lot of private pockets while trying to overthrow liberal governments. Ah, the truth of the matter! Even this cartoon is a cover-up of the real crimes.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)Figures. But tell this to a rwnj and they'll look at you like you're crazy. They don't even have the mental capacity to consider anything that tarnishes the veneer of St. Ronnie.
lebkuchen
(10,716 posts)in part, about the Rogers Commission, which Feynman was on (as were Sally Ride and Chuck Yeager). I read the book years ago, and he did not think the mission was rushed for the State of the Union address, though he did demonstrate his experiment with an o-ring in icy water to explain what had caused the explosion.
However, I've always had my personal doubts about the launch. Was Reagan's initial SOU address ever made public? It couldn't have consumed that much of the address, something that would have been easily altered if there had been another delay.
catbyte
(34,341 posts)We were flying back to Michigan that afternoon, and we were watching the launch as were getting ready to go. I'll never forget that. It's one of those indelible moments that you'll remember even with advanced Alzheimer's. I remember how cold it was in Philadelphia too--there was a cold snap all up & down the entire Eastern seaboard. I also remember how angry I was when it was revealed that it was entirely avoidable and that they launched just so Reagan could brag about it during the SOTU. I remember that nauseating speech Reagan gave; oh-so-sincere even though he knew full well it was partly his fault. Typical Republican MO: fakery masquerading as substance. It seems to be the biggest lesson learned from the "Reagan Revolution"--stagecraft over substance. Yuck. RIP Challenger crew.
lebkuchen
(10,716 posts)The Rogers' Commission couldn't find any.
catbyte
(34,341 posts)lebkuchen
(10,716 posts)It makes sense that it would happen. However, I had a lot of confidence in the commission to come through with the truth. Perhaps I shouldn't have.
FunkyLeprechaun
(2,383 posts)I was 4 years old and we had tickets to see the launch (standing in the crowd) the day before (27 January 1986) and we saw the astronauts etc, they had cancelled it and we thought about going to the launch again (28 January) but my mom said it was far too cold and they'd be crazy to continue with the launch, we watched the launch from somewhere else (I don't remember very much of it). I'm from Minnesota and we were wearing our Minnesota clothes in Florida (wearing our heavy coats, hats and gloves and heavy clothing and Minnesota is often very cold every January). My mom and dad both said that they were shocked with how cold Florida was that January (they had packed mild weather clothing in anticipation of milder weather in Florida compared to the harsh winter in Minnesota).
I've been back in Florida in January over five times since and I've never experienced a very cold Floridan weather like that since that day in 1986.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,155 posts)And I remember my parents saying in retrospect it was almost as if it was an omen.
malaise
(268,717 posts)and yes it did not have to happen
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)But once I learned it was 32 degrees in Florida, I left at my usual time because I didn't think for one second that they'd attempt to launch in such weather when they'd never done it before...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=46575
rocktivity
applegrove
(118,501 posts)resdense at university. It was so shocking. And i think it is spelt Feynman.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I think that was actually one of Reagan's best moments, when you saw how he comforted the families and there is a famous picture of that.
Odd, I can't find that picture, it is famous and I can't find it doing an image search on google.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)he was a fascist pig
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Christ on a crutch.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)I was watching tv with the sound off so I didn't know what happened until I saw it happen. Horrific.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)As usual.
Gentle-man
(39 posts)Why haven't Democratic politicians attacked Reagan on this basis?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Reagan was evil.
Botany
(70,447 posts)Richard Feynman proved the O rings could have been compromised because of the
cold temps and pressure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster