Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:00 PM Jan 2013

How Did We Come To “Unknow” What We Already Knew In 1981?

PROOF: The Right’s Denial of Climate Change is a LIE.

-snip-

The Energy Task Force report to Ronald Reagan in May 1981:

“Given the magnitude of the potential threat represented by global climate change, it is equally in the strategic interest of the United States to identify and implement cost-effective measures at home and abroad to stabilize the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gasses at levels that will not lead to catastrophic climatic change.”


It goes on to say:

“Many different constituencies within the U.S. government will need to work together to develop a unified and integrated energy policy framework with well-defined and orchestrated goals—a policy that addresses not only today’s energy bottlenecks, but also will seek to provide affordable, clean, and reliable energy supplies five to fifteen years into the future, in order to underpin long-term economic growth in an environmentally acceptable manner and to promote the security of the United States, and its allies”


So just to review, this republican task force sponsored by the James Baker Institute and the Foreign Affairs Councilfrom 1981 said they knew and understood that we had a serious problem.

At the time, they said it would take 5 to 15 years to provide alternatives, which would, in their words, promote the security of the United States. That should have meant we would have made the transition by 1986 at latest.

The rest: http://buckyworld.me/2013/01/26/proofthe-rights-denial-of-climate-change-is-a-lie/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Did We Come To “Unknow” What We Already Knew In 1981? (Original Post) JaneyVee Jan 2013 OP
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #1
Ronald Reagan was concerned about pollution from trees. libinnyandia Jan 2013 #2
Institutions pushed back really hard to preserve their supernatural myths and monetary haul... Tikki Jan 2013 #3
Then filed away... RobertEarl Jan 2013 #4
K&R tk2kewl Jan 2013 #5

Brother Buzz

(36,383 posts)
1. There are known knowns; there are things we know we know.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jan 2013

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know.
We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don’t know we don’t know. - Rumsfeld

Tikki

(14,549 posts)
3. Institutions pushed back really hard to preserve their supernatural myths and monetary haul...
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:10 PM
Jan 2013

and they won't give up until we step up and make them as obsolete as betamax...

Tikki

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. Then filed away...
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:27 PM
Jan 2013

..... under "Now we know how to make a really big mess, thankyou"

Only idiots of the most moneyed persuasions denied that we could and would alter the climate. They figured, correctly, that there is no short term profit to be made by protecting the environment and like one Interior secretary declared, Jesus is coming soon so why worry? Watt was his name?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Did We Come To “Unkno...