Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:09 PM Jan 2012

So who is up for sleuthing out this Pelosi hint about something that makes Newt unelectable?

I just saw her say on video that Newt "would never be president." Apparently she has now stated this twice. And quite adamantly.

Here's a cryptic remark she made on Today:

A day later, her spokesman indicated that the "something" that Pelosi claims to have is available to the public if they look for it. Pelosi has not commented directly on the subject since her interview with King on Tuesday.

"Leader Pelosi previously made a reference to the extensive amount of information that is in the public record, including the comprehensive committee report with which the public may not be fully aware," Hammill said.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46147307/ns/today-today_people/t/pelosi-vs-gingrich-what-something-does-she-know/#.TyNlP_nNkqM

Anyone have any clue what she might be referring to?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So who is up for sleuthing out this Pelosi hint about something that makes Newt unelectable? (Original Post) Generic Other Jan 2012 OP
I think they had sex in the House canteen....n/t unkachuck Jan 2012 #1
My eyes. My eyes. OMg BadGimp Jan 2012 #9
I heard he and Callista used to really get down and dirty in the Speeeeekah's offices...nt MADem Jan 2012 #24
Yeah, yeah, give it a break. randome Jan 2012 #2
I am not at all interested in a "master plan" to defeat him since he isn't going to win IMO Generic Other Jan 2012 #6
Then my apologies. randome Jan 2012 #8
in this case the right time most likely was THEN but NOW will do SwampG8r Jan 2012 #22
Newt makes Newt unelectable Generic Brad Jan 2012 #3
I am sure you are right about that Generic Other Jan 2012 #7
I agree, If Pelosi said Charlie Manson would never be president Johonny Jan 2012 #25
i think she has said the context was arely staircase Jan 2012 #4
Google Gingrich Bribery Scandal Nictuku Jan 2012 #5
This is the report, I believe... SaintPete Jan 2012 #10
Noot had sex with another woman, not his wife. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #11
Disgusting as the thought is Generic Other Jan 2012 #13
She worked with him and knows exactly how much of a fuck-up he is Major Nikon Jan 2012 #12
And Bob Dole too Generic Other Jan 2012 #14
He's right Major Nikon Jan 2012 #17
If she wanted to KILL his career XemaSab Jan 2012 #15
There is a FOIA request on the documents from when the Ethics committee Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #16
I know he paid over $300,000 for ethics violations when Speaker. appleannie1 Jan 2012 #18
I have a possible theory (no facts) Samantha Jan 2012 #19
backroom deals sound like Congress's MO Generic Other Jan 2012 #26
Just two things to say in response to your astute post Samantha Jan 2012 #28
She may know some (R)s in The House who will come out against him Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #20
Her campaign said today she was referencing stuff already in the public record. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2012 #21
If Newt is electable now, not even murdering hobos for fun will change it. Capitalocracy Jan 2012 #23
They overlooked Bush and Cheney's total unsuitability Generic Other Jan 2012 #27
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. Yeah, yeah, give it a break.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:16 PM
Jan 2012

Something she said was taken out of context. There is no 'master plan' any more than Wikileaks is saving up its ammo for the 'right time' or Karl Rove is about to be indicted any day now.

We need to stop looking for saviors to drop victory into our hands.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
6. I am not at all interested in a "master plan" to defeat him since he isn't going to win IMO
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:28 PM
Jan 2012

I am just being snoopy. Probably, I have come late to the conversation.

I was hoping someone on this site could fill me in on what she meant. I am not really up on my Newtlore.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. Then my apologies.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:36 PM
Jan 2012

I've seen too many 'maybe they're going to save us' posts on this subject and others. IMO, she wasn't hinting at anything and if anyone had ammo to use against the GOP, it would make no sense to hold back until the 'right time'.

The 'right time' to destroy your opponents is always NOW.

Generic Brad

(14,274 posts)
3. Newt makes Newt unelectable
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:18 PM
Jan 2012

Have you heard his ideas? That nonsense won't sell to the majority of American voters.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
7. I am sure you are right about that
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:32 PM
Jan 2012

The crack he made about Pelosi being from San Francisco where they live in a "fantasy" did not sound like the words of a man who had a strategy for winning a presidential election. A win in the SC primary is nothing really.

I am curious though about the backstory. Newt is ancient history to many voters including me. I am flabbergasted they dusted him off and brought him out of the retirement center.

Johonny

(20,840 posts)
25. I agree, If Pelosi said Charlie Manson would never be president
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:39 AM
Jan 2012

Republicans would wast countless hour looking for the secret why she thinks he is unelectable.

what secrets? All Newts crap is out in the open for years and years and would scare a sane voter away.


arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
4. i think she has said the context was
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:18 PM
Jan 2012

THERE (kinda as in THAT) is something i know - he will never be elected president. Meaning the thing she knows is that he can't be elected.

Nictuku

(3,606 posts)
5. Google Gingrich Bribery Scandal
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:24 PM
Jan 2012

I'd bet that is what it is about (bribery involving Israelis who wanted the arms embargo lifted against Saddam Hussain).

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
12. She worked with him and knows exactly how much of a fuck-up he is
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:54 PM
Jan 2012

Newt comes across well to some people because he gives the impression that he knows what he's talking about. However, the more he talks, the more you realize he doesn't have a fucking clue. That's why many people on both sides of the isle that know Newt well can't stand him. Romney was right. Newt resigned in disgrace as House Speaker. Even the GOP couldn't stand him.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
17. He's right
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:20 AM
Jan 2012

I think it's possible the GOP leadership knew of Gingrich's philandering during the impeachment of Clinton and one of the reasons, if not the main reason, they forced him to resign was because they were afraid he was going to take the whole party down with him. Had the public known, he would have.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
16. There is a FOIA request on the documents from when the Ethics committee
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:15 AM
Jan 2012

investigated him back in the 90s before he resigned in disgrace.

She was on that committee.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
19. I have a possible theory (no facts)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:57 AM
Jan 2012

It might be possible that Ethics Committee recommended that Gingrich not be allowed to hold any office of public trust. There were many counts that were dismissed. That leads one to think about how things work in Washington -- the Committee "gave" him a break of some of the counts but he would have had to have given back. Perhaps because of the amount of the fine being reduced he signed off on conditions the Committee submitted, thinking if some of the counts were dismissed the fine would not be as horrific. (As it was, someone else paid the $300,000 fine on his behalf -- might have been Dole, can't remember for sure.)

Gingrich probably figured at that time he didn't care if he worked for the Federal Government or any state government the rest of his life in an elected capacity because he planned to move into the private sector and make a substantial amount more in money.

I was researching this the other evening and saw that when a member of Congress is impeached and found guilty, that member would be barred for ever again holding an office of public trust. So perhaps it was one of the Committee's recommendation that this prohibition be applied to Gingrich since obviously there was a model in place that justified such recommendation, and perhaps for the reasons above Gingrich signed off on all the conditions the Committee required, leaving just the one ethics charge.

So if that were true, Gingrich would be barred from ever holding the Office of the President of the United States.

When Nancy Pelosi said he would never be President of the United States, the Republicans could nominate him, that was closely followed by the phrase "I know things." It was just the way she said it that made me jump to the conclusion she, as a member of that Committee, knew Gingrich would never hold another office of public trust.

Okay, taking off my conspiracy hat now, and waiting for your chastisements....

Sam

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
26. backroom deals sound like Congress's MO
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:45 PM
Jan 2012

Everything Gingrich evokes memories of the impeachment years, the years of all those old farts and their mistresses. There were a lot of shenanigans going on and it clearly never was just Clinton. Obviously there were sex scandals simmering in just about every closet back then. Sounds like bribes disguised as lobby money too. All that Scaife, Koch, Heritage Foundation stuff. They have been operating just beneath the surface for a lot of years too. Gingrich's era were their formatiove years. Wonder how involved these folks might have been in setting up Clinton?

Just so many possible reasons why Gingrich should be unelectable.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
28. Just two things to say in response to your astute post
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 09:44 PM
Jan 2012

Speaking of background deals, are you aware that the reps of George H.W. Bush scoured the field pre-1992 for candidates that could possibly deny the elder Bush a second term. The only possibility they saw was Clinton. A backroom deal was floated to Clinton that if he sat out the 1992 election, four years later he could run and there would be no serious Republican opposition. Clinton declined the offer. He won the election, and from that day on, a group of people seriously furious with him for unseating George H.W. Bush, started a series of meeting to scandalize Clinton and to make his Presidency ineffective. They kept at it for years.

Second, were you familiar with Clinton's response to the Republicans regarding the threat to impeach him? (I have to confess, at this time I was a Republican, so then I was not defending the man, just paying close attention to matters as they unraveled.) He said there were so many members of Congress participating in behavior equal to or worse than his own, and if they proceeded down the Impeachment road in all their hypocrisy, he would leak the names of those with checkered behavior (and that is putting it politely) as well as the names of those with whom they were involved. The Republicans did not back down, and neither did Clinton. When that article was printed in Salon, I was appalled at what I read, I left the Republican party. I could not be associated with that kind of hypocrisy. One of the worst was Henry Hyde, who personally hand-delivered the articles of impeachment. He had a long-term mistress. And the list went on from there.

Sam

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
21. Her campaign said today she was referencing stuff already in the public record.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:09 AM
Jan 2012

So the sleuthing should be easy.

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
23. If Newt is electable now, not even murdering hobos for fun will change it.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:26 AM
Jan 2012

If they're willing to elect him now (which I'm not so sure they are) then people are willing to overlook anything.

And besides, if it did come out that he liked to murder hobos for fun, he'd just be like, "Well, I just love America so much, and I get so passionate about it, that I just have to find some poor homeless person and grab his throat and just throttle the life out of him. And then go cheat on my ailing wife."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So who is up for sleuthin...