General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo who is up for sleuthing out this Pelosi hint about something that makes Newt unelectable?
I just saw her say on video that Newt "would never be president." Apparently she has now stated this twice. And quite adamantly.
Here's a cryptic remark she made on Today:
A day later, her spokesman indicated that the "something" that Pelosi claims to have is available to the public if they look for it. Pelosi has not commented directly on the subject since her interview with King on Tuesday.
"Leader Pelosi previously made a reference to the extensive amount of information that is in the public record, including the comprehensive committee report with which the public may not be fully aware," Hammill said.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46147307/ns/today-today_people/t/pelosi-vs-gingrich-what-something-does-she-know/#.TyNlP_nNkqM
Anyone have any clue what she might be referring to?
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)BadGimp
(4,015 posts)Thx a pile
MADem
(135,425 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Something she said was taken out of context. There is no 'master plan' any more than Wikileaks is saving up its ammo for the 'right time' or Karl Rove is about to be indicted any day now.
We need to stop looking for saviors to drop victory into our hands.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I am just being snoopy. Probably, I have come late to the conversation.
I was hoping someone on this site could fill me in on what she meant. I am not really up on my Newtlore.
randome
(34,845 posts)I've seen too many 'maybe they're going to save us' posts on this subject and others. IMO, she wasn't hinting at anything and if anyone had ammo to use against the GOP, it would make no sense to hold back until the 'right time'.
The 'right time' to destroy your opponents is always NOW.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)i cant stand that smug bastard
Generic Brad
(14,274 posts)Have you heard his ideas? That nonsense won't sell to the majority of American voters.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)The crack he made about Pelosi being from San Francisco where they live in a "fantasy" did not sound like the words of a man who had a strategy for winning a presidential election. A win in the SC primary is nothing really.
I am curious though about the backstory. Newt is ancient history to many voters including me. I am flabbergasted they dusted him off and brought him out of the retirement center.
Johonny
(20,840 posts)Republicans would wast countless hour looking for the secret why she thinks he is unelectable.
what secrets? All Newts crap is out in the open for years and years and would scare a sane voter away.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)THERE (kinda as in THAT) is something i know - he will never be elected president. Meaning the thing she knows is that he can't be elected.
Nictuku
(3,606 posts)I'd bet that is what it is about (bribery involving Israelis who wanted the arms embargo lifted against Saddam Hussain).
SaintPete
(533 posts)In 4 parts. I'm posting now, then skipping to the end of part 4 to see if there is anything there that is provocative.
http://ethics.house.gov/committee-report/matter-representative-newt-gingrich
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)And not Callista, either.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)This is what I was thinking.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Newt comes across well to some people because he gives the impression that he knows what he's talking about. However, the more he talks, the more you realize he doesn't have a fucking clue. That's why many people on both sides of the isle that know Newt well can't stand him. Romney was right. Newt resigned in disgrace as House Speaker. Even the GOP couldn't stand him.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)"Hardly anyone who served with Newt in Congress has endorsed him and that fact speaks for itself," Dole wrote in the letter.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11386533/1/bob-dole-once-tried-to-help-gingrich-pay-fine.html
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)I think it's possible the GOP leadership knew of Gingrich's philandering during the impeachment of Clinton and one of the reasons, if not the main reason, they forced him to resign was because they were afraid he was going to take the whole party down with him. Had the public known, he would have.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)She'd come right out and endorse him.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)investigated him back in the 90s before he resigned in disgrace.
She was on that committee.
appleannie1
(5,067 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)It might be possible that Ethics Committee recommended that Gingrich not be allowed to hold any office of public trust. There were many counts that were dismissed. That leads one to think about how things work in Washington -- the Committee "gave" him a break of some of the counts but he would have had to have given back. Perhaps because of the amount of the fine being reduced he signed off on conditions the Committee submitted, thinking if some of the counts were dismissed the fine would not be as horrific. (As it was, someone else paid the $300,000 fine on his behalf -- might have been Dole, can't remember for sure.)
Gingrich probably figured at that time he didn't care if he worked for the Federal Government or any state government the rest of his life in an elected capacity because he planned to move into the private sector and make a substantial amount more in money.
I was researching this the other evening and saw that when a member of Congress is impeached and found guilty, that member would be barred for ever again holding an office of public trust. So perhaps it was one of the Committee's recommendation that this prohibition be applied to Gingrich since obviously there was a model in place that justified such recommendation, and perhaps for the reasons above Gingrich signed off on all the conditions the Committee required, leaving just the one ethics charge.
So if that were true, Gingrich would be barred from ever holding the Office of the President of the United States.
When Nancy Pelosi said he would never be President of the United States, the Republicans could nominate him, that was closely followed by the phrase "I know things." It was just the way she said it that made me jump to the conclusion she, as a member of that Committee, knew Gingrich would never hold another office of public trust.
Okay, taking off my conspiracy hat now, and waiting for your chastisements....
Sam
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Everything Gingrich evokes memories of the impeachment years, the years of all those old farts and their mistresses. There were a lot of shenanigans going on and it clearly never was just Clinton. Obviously there were sex scandals simmering in just about every closet back then. Sounds like bribes disguised as lobby money too. All that Scaife, Koch, Heritage Foundation stuff. They have been operating just beneath the surface for a lot of years too. Gingrich's era were their formatiove years. Wonder how involved these folks might have been in setting up Clinton?
Just so many possible reasons why Gingrich should be unelectable.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Speaking of background deals, are you aware that the reps of George H.W. Bush scoured the field pre-1992 for candidates that could possibly deny the elder Bush a second term. The only possibility they saw was Clinton. A backroom deal was floated to Clinton that if he sat out the 1992 election, four years later he could run and there would be no serious Republican opposition. Clinton declined the offer. He won the election, and from that day on, a group of people seriously furious with him for unseating George H.W. Bush, started a series of meeting to scandalize Clinton and to make his Presidency ineffective. They kept at it for years.
Second, were you familiar with Clinton's response to the Republicans regarding the threat to impeach him? (I have to confess, at this time I was a Republican, so then I was not defending the man, just paying close attention to matters as they unraveled.) He said there were so many members of Congress participating in behavior equal to or worse than his own, and if they proceeded down the Impeachment road in all their hypocrisy, he would leak the names of those with checkered behavior (and that is putting it politely) as well as the names of those with whom they were involved. The Republicans did not back down, and neither did Clinton. When that article was printed in Salon, I was appalled at what I read, I left the Republican party. I could not be associated with that kind of hypocrisy. One of the worst was Henry Hyde, who personally hand-delivered the articles of impeachment. He had a long-term mistress. And the list went on from there.
Sam
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)if he even gets close.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)So the sleuthing should be easy.
Capitalocracy
(4,307 posts)If they're willing to elect him now (which I'm not so sure they are) then people are willing to overlook anything.
And besides, if it did come out that he liked to murder hobos for fun, he'd just be like, "Well, I just love America so much, and I get so passionate about it, that I just have to find some poor homeless person and grab his throat and just throttle the life out of him. And then go cheat on my ailing wife."
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)so I won't put anything past them.