Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:18 PM Jan 2012

Grover Norquist: impeach President Obama if he doesn't extend tax cuts for the rich

Norquist Looks Ahead

By Ed Kilgore

As screwed up as things are in Congress right now, it’s natural that nobody much wants to contemplate how much more screwed up things might be after the November elections unless one party or the other emerges with united control and something of a mandate. So it was interesting to read an interview Nancy Cook of National Journal conducted with everybody’s favorite right-wing commissar, power-broker and demagogue, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform, about post-election scenarios:

NORQUIST: If the Republicans have the House, Senate, and the presidency, I’m told that they could do an early budget vote—a reconciliation vote where you extend the Bush tax cuts out for a decade or five years…. then they pass the (Paul) Ryan plan (on Medicare).

NJ: What if the Democrats still have control? What’s your scenario then?

NORQUIST: Obama can sit there and let all the tax (cuts) lapse, and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach.

Yes, “impeach.”

Now you have to appreciate that Grover is probably feeling a little long in the tooth lately, and perhaps impatient. With all the back-and-forth over who said and did what during the administration of St. Ronald Reagan, it’s bound to make him think back to his salad days in the early 1980s, when he as swaggering around Washington with a bumper sticker on his briefcase that read “I’d rather be killing commies,” an allusion to his pastime of hanging out with “freedom fighters” being backed by South Africa’s apartheid regime. Or perhaps he’s fondly remembering the later period when he was famous for harassing state legislatures and city councils to name things after Reagan.

Some of Grover’s more recent projects haven’t gone so well, most notably his effort to turn Muslim-Americans into a pro-Republican voting bloc (viz. the recent candidate debate in Florida, when a question from a Palestinian-American voter launched several of the would-be presidents into a lather of Muslim-bashing).

- more -

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_01/norquist_looks_ahead035063.php



Here's the actual title of the National Journal piece:

    Impeach Obama?
    Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend the Bush tax cuts.


41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grover Norquist: impeach President Obama if he doesn't extend tax cuts for the rich (Original Post) ProSense Jan 2012 OP
Norquist's influence is shrinking down enough to a size where it may soon drown in a bathtub. stopbush Jan 2012 #1
Grover Norquist: from the mouth of an Iran's Lobbyist FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #2
Does he really think that would go over well with voters abelenkpe Jan 2012 #3
Do you really think edhopper Jan 2012 #12
LOL! no abelenkpe Jan 2012 #30
Grover should have been tried for treason ages ago malaise Jan 2012 #4
Yes, making congress people sign pledges for what HE wants tabatha Jan 2012 #15
His pledge also goes the Pledge of Office everyone in Congress took. RC Jan 2012 #34
You might want to get a copy of the Constitution onenote Jan 2012 #35
Heal Thyself TheMastersNemesis Jan 2012 #5
"Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend.." tabatha Jan 2012 #6
no, the only electorate norquist believes exists newspeak Jan 2012 #32
Don't worry Grover, Obama's got this covered MadHound Jan 2012 #7
No, he will not. tabatha Jan 2012 #16
Really? MadHound Jan 2012 #17
So you are allied with Norquist? BumRushDaShow Jan 2012 #19
Why do you think that I'm allied with Norquist? MadHound Jan 2012 #24
You're problem BumRushDaShow Jan 2012 #28
And what does DADT have to do with extending the tax cuts? hobbit709 Jan 2012 #38
Nothing, I think the poster is a Norquist ally that wants those taxes to stay low!! Dragonfli Jan 2012 #39
Extending the Bush/Obama tax cuts was no assumption, it actually happened. Read a paper some time nt Dragonfli Jan 2012 #40
misery squad? BootinUp Jan 2012 #41
I don't know paulk Jan 2012 #26
He didn't do it for nothing. Arkana Jan 2012 #27
What a rotten thing he is. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2012 #8
Calling all Teanderthals!!! Bohunk68 Jan 2012 #9
Grover - There's a tiny little orifice I would invite you to lick, but I don't want your germs. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #10
Impeach him for what? Beaverhausen Jan 2012 #11
Blow me, you sack of shit. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2012 #13
Impeachment? Hold Your Breath, Norquist..... (n/t) Paladin Jan 2012 #14
Thanks. What a hoot! "Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion Zorra Jan 2012 #18
i'm somewhat surprised barbtries Jan 2012 #20
I didn't realize not bowing to the wants of the 1% nobodyspecial Jan 2012 #21
The dude needs to STFU and crawl back under from which he came...he is so over it opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #22
Posted this on my Facebook page with my usual derisive comments. mmonk Jan 2012 #23
Little furry Grover is sounding a bit shrill, isn't he? Buns_of_Fire Jan 2012 #25
Grover you sound like a mouth piece for the 1%. sarcasmo Jan 2012 #29
this is why we need polls back: to vote on whether this is more frivolous than Clinton impeachment yurbud Jan 2012 #31
The law was to sunset after ten years congress extended it two years. nt julian09 Jan 2012 #33
Barack Obama: Impale Grover Norquist if he doesn't sit down and STFU. Ship of Fools Jan 2012 #36
Grover Norquist is a piece of crap. Rex Jan 2012 #37

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
3. Does he really think that would go over well with voters
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:26 PM
Jan 2012

given that polling suggests between 70-80 percent of all Americans favor increasing taxes on the rich?

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
30. LOL! no
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:01 PM
Jan 2012

But I do think the reps he would need to pursue impeaching the president might.

Ask congress to impeach the president because he refuses to continue coddling the 1% while the rest suffer? Suicide if one wants to be re-elected.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
15. Yes, making congress people sign pledges for what HE wants
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jan 2012

and to go against the electorate, is treason.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
34. His pledge also goes the Pledge of Office everyone in Congress took.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:20 PM
Jan 2012

How is that not treason?

onenote

(42,694 posts)
35. You might want to get a copy of the Constitution
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:33 PM
Jan 2012

Norquist is a doofus but what he does isn't "treason" as that term is narrowly defined in the US Constitution. Indeed, its not even illegal.

Its just bad policy.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
5. Heal Thyself
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jan 2012

If Norquist ever got sick, he should NOT receive any healthcare. Since he believes that everyone should take care of himself. He has been responsible for the deaths a lot of Americans. He is complete GOP scum.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
6. "Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend.."
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jan 2012

In his dreams.

By whom?

The vast majority of the electorate wants the rich to pay their fair share.

But to Norquist, the electorate and democracy do not matter.

POS.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
32. no, the only electorate norquist believes exists
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jan 2012

are the wealthy and corporations. Reagan lowered taxes and then had to raise them twice; however, he still caused a massive deficit. The rich do not create jobs; unless they get mega bucks for it. So, most jobs are going to countries that love slave labor and little regulations. They can keep repeating the shite like a mantra, it's still a fabrication.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
7. Don't worry Grover, Obama's got this covered
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jan 2012

There will be some sort of kabuki theater, some sort of "hostage"situation, and then in the name of bipartisanship, Obama will again preemptively cave and extend tax cuts for the rich for years longer.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
17. Really?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:54 PM
Jan 2012

That's exactly what he did last time. What makes you think anything, any damn thing, will be different the next time around?

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
24. Why do you think that I'm allied with Norquist?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:29 PM
Jan 2012

Because I point out the fact that Obama has already extended the tax cuts for the rich, and based on that fact it is likely he will extend them again.

Sorry that reality is such a disappointment for you, but it is reality nevertheless. Unless you can point out to me where Obama didn't extend the tax cuts for the wealthy

BumRushDaShow

(128,844 posts)
28. You're problem
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jan 2012

is citing skewed "assumptions" as fact. That is the sort of thing that Faux Snooze does.

Too many here on DU were adamant that DADT would not be repealed based on their "assumptions-as-fact", yet here we are today without it.

Sorry but the misery squad has become irrelevant.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
39. Nothing, I think the poster is a Norquist ally that wants those taxes to stay low!!
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jan 2012

Why else would the poster try to divert discussion away from the ever continuing tax cuts that were voted for by conservatives in Dem clothing as well as the "honest about what they are" Republicans.

The extensions were also signed By a Democratic (at least party affiliation wise if not Progressive policy wise) President.

I just learned that calling a long time progressive on this board a "Norquist ally", even when it is obviously being leveled against a DUer that is rabidly anti-Bush/Obama tax cuts by one that sees the continued tax cuts as something that was good or at least something we must not rally against.

Ass backwards accusation, reeks of projection by the pro tax cut poster calling people names.

paulk

(11,586 posts)
26. I don't know
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:47 PM
Jan 2012

I think there's been enough pressure that Obama is, at least, starting to change his rhetoric on this. I'm not convinced it's all theater.

The proof, as they say, is in the pudding, however, and Obama's past actions don't lead one toward hope.

Hope is all I have, though, so I need to hang on to it.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
27. He didn't do it for nothing.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:48 PM
Jan 2012

He did it so that millions of unemployed people could continue receiving the help they need.

He made the best of a really shitty situation, and I have to tell you--your denigration of him says a lot more about you than it does about him.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
9. Calling all Teanderthals!!!
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:36 PM
Jan 2012

I've got an idea if you want to exercise your 2nd amendment rights against treasonous bastards who hate the Constitution.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
10. Grover - There's a tiny little orifice I would invite you to lick, but I don't want your germs.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jan 2012

What an idiot.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
18. Thanks. What a hoot! "Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:58 PM
Jan 2012

if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend the Bush tax cuts."!1!1!


Who's gonna rebel? It sure won't be the 99%.

And if it ain't the 99%, that leaves

1%.

Good luck with that, Grover...does the name Custer mean anything to you?

barbtries

(28,787 posts)
20. i'm somewhat surprised
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:11 PM
Jan 2012

that the republicans haven't tried to impeach him yet. they'll do that for political reasons as proven by history

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
21. I didn't realize not bowing to the wants of the 1%
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:12 PM
Jan 2012

were sufficient grounds for impeachment.

And newsflash Norquist, the rebellion happens if those tax cuts are extended. Millions should not be made to suffer just so multimillionaires and billionaires can amass more money than they could possibly spend in a lifetime.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,174 posts)
25. Little furry Grover is sounding a bit shrill, isn't he?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jan 2012

That tends to happen when people like him realize that people aren't marching to their tune anymore. Yeah, Grover, I'm real afraid of the 1% "rebelling" -- I'm shaking all over. What're they going to do -- leave the country? "Go Galt" on us? Big deal. What are they going to do to the country that they haven't already done?

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
31. this is why we need polls back: to vote on whether this is more frivolous than Clinton impeachment
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:41 PM
Jan 2012

It's ironic that like the filibuster, Republicans use impeachment when it's entirely inappropriate and Democrats won't use either when it's essential to protect our democracy and stop ongoing crimes.

Ship of Fools

(1,453 posts)
36. Barack Obama: Impale Grover Norquist if he doesn't sit down and STFU.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:50 PM
Jan 2012

An unofficial, unelected fuckwad nobody. How I'd like to take the Roves, Palins, and Norquists of the
world and bang their empty little heads together.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Grover Norquist: impeach ...