Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,985 posts)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:56 PM Jan 2012

的f Obama is the food stamp president-then Bush was the planes crashing into buildings president"

Maher Mocks Conservatives as Racists and Defends Liberal Hatred of Bush

.........................

The one complaint they have is they really are sensitive about the idea that they are racist. And not all of them, of course, are. But then they do like nine racist things every week.

And this is what I want to say to them, is like stuff like this strikes me, like saying that you're threatened, Newt Gingrich calling Obama the "food stamp President" because he took office in a recession when people were needing more food stamps. It's like calling George Bush the "planes crashing into buildings President."

..............Say what you will about the left's hatred of Bush, at least we were hating on the real guy. We didn't invent a boogeyman who tanked the economy, took us to war on false pretenses, and tortured prisoners. That was the actual guy.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2012/01/28/maher-mocks-conservatives-racists-and-defends-liberal-hatred-bush#ixzz1kmDTmnF1



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2012/01/28/maher-mocks-conservatives-racists-and-defends-liberal-hatred-bush#ixzz1kmDDalNn

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
的f Obama is the food stamp president-then Bush was the planes crashing into buildings president" (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #1
how did i ever guess that this was your first post to Democratic Underground? stlsaxman Jan 2012 #3
I don't like your new sock puppets name. Swede Jan 2012 #4
Wow, did that touch a nerve or something? Rex Jan 2012 #7
Believe it or not, 2 people voted NOT to hide that post Major Nikon Jan 2012 #8
I suspect some vote that way because they don't like the jury system at all. lpbk2713 Jan 2012 #16
Pretty sad if that's the case Major Nikon Jan 2012 #18
I am inclined to agree with you as a Host Rex Jan 2012 #21
I don't like that analogy, simply because BUSH is the food stamp president. tridim Jan 2012 #2
Food stamp program participation wouldn't have gone up under Pres. Obama IF... Denninmi Jan 2012 #5
I would be proud to be called the Food Stamp President because food stamps are awesome. limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #6
Bill was hot last night. Sure was proud of him. He of course was right. However, that girl southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #9
not only did she not shut up, she had nothing to say when she spoke. rurallib Jan 2012 #10
She really said that global warming is happening but ONLY because of sunspots. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #12
LOL, your right. I wanted to stick my head through the screen and tell her to shut up. Wondered southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #13
Like Bill said, "There's that bubble again, conservatives live inside a bubble". FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #15
Thanks I couldn't remember his name. He sure did vaporize him and he still couldn't deal with southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #19
Maher dismantled the conservatives using facts and pointing out how they live in a bubble. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #11
It was but alas they still are delusional. They never give credit to democrats for anything. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #14
I don't really expect them to any more than I expect Democrats to do the same Major Nikon Jan 2012 #24
Your right. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #25
Bush was the Emergency No-Bid Contract president. lpbk2713 Jan 2012 #17
What I can't understand is how they got away with these no-bid contracts. It is illegal. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #20
Of course it looks that way to most people. lpbk2713 Jan 2012 #22
There are provisions in the law for it Major Nikon Jan 2012 #23
I didn't know that. I remember working in a contract office for the military clubs and when you southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #26
The system should be flexible to allow for it Major Nikon Jan 2012 #28
Guess someone always finds a way to abuse the situation. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #29
Which just goes cbrer Jan 2012 #27

Response to kpete (Original post)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
7. Wow, did that touch a nerve or something?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jan 2012

Bill is right on the money, again. Must suck being right so much.

lpbk2713

(42,753 posts)
16. I suspect some vote that way because they don't like the jury system at all.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:09 PM
Jan 2012



I've seen other votes where the verdict would seem obviously unanimous
but it didn't turn out that way. Just a guess on my part however.


Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
18. Pretty sad if that's the case
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jan 2012

Saying it's OK for a freeper to post here because you are turned off by the jury system is just nutty, but I do agree with the possibility of that motivation. I can't think of any other reasons.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
21. I am inclined to agree with you as a Host
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:16 PM
Jan 2012

and I believe it is the people that complain the MOST about the system being a failure...that are trying to sink it by gaming the system.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
2. I don't like that analogy, simply because BUSH is the food stamp president.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:06 PM
Jan 2012

It is a fact that he is responsible for the lingering effects of the American economy he helped destroy.

Of course he is also the "ignore the pre-9/11 warnings" pResident and the "let Bin Laden go at Tora Bora" pResident, not to mention the "bail out the TBTF banks" pResident.

Obama is the "clean up Bush's destruction and turn every economic indicator back into a positive President", all despite 100% GOP obstruction.

Denninmi

(6,581 posts)
5. Food stamp program participation wouldn't have gone up under Pres. Obama IF...
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jan 2012

Bush and the rest of the republican mafiosi hadn't completely trashed the economy in the first place.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
6. I would be proud to be called the Food Stamp President because food stamps are awesome.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:26 PM
Jan 2012

The main problem with food stamps is they are too hard to get.

We need a real food stamp president who will give food stamps to anybody who needs them.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
9. Bill was hot last night. Sure was proud of him. He of course was right. However, that girl
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jan 2012

in the middle never shut up. Of course neither did the republican who looked upset from the beginning last night. Martin hardly got a chance to talk and I wanted to hear what he had to say. Foley did have some points.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
13. LOL, your right. I wanted to stick my head through the screen and tell her to shut up. Wondered
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jan 2012

was wrong with the republican? He seemed mad from the very beginning. Like he didn't want to be there. He never gave any credit to Obama for anything. The hate for Obama just seem to ooze from his mouth.

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
15. Like Bill said, "There's that bubble again, conservatives live inside a bubble".
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:08 PM
Jan 2012

Then all of Rohrbacher's talking points got vaporized.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
19. Thanks I couldn't remember his name. He sure did vaporize him and he still couldn't deal with
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:13 PM
Jan 2012

facts. Just talking about the Clinton raising taxes and how it helped the man was unbelievable. He made himself look stupid.

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
11. Maher dismantled the conservatives using facts and pointing out how they live in a bubble.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:55 PM
Jan 2012

It was good to see.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
24. I don't really expect them to any more than I expect Democrats to do the same
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:41 PM
Jan 2012

It's just they start to get over the top when they start blaming Obama for a situation that was created in large part to Shrub's fucked up domestic policies.

lpbk2713

(42,753 posts)
17. Bush was the Emergency No-Bid Contract president.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jan 2012




BushCo gave more money to his corpor-rat friends than Obama
ever could give away to those who genuinely need the help.


lpbk2713

(42,753 posts)
22. Of course it looks that way to most people.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jan 2012




But BushCo had the deck stacked heavily in their favor. They owned all three branches of the Federal government. They wrote the laws, they interpreted the laws and they enforced the laws, when they felt like it. They appointed their own people to high positions in the Justice Department who would usually turn a blind eye to any shady deals BushCo was in favor of. The rethuglican Congress would pass laws which would just make stealing money from the US Treasury more legal.


What amazes me is after all this time the thieves in high places have not been held accountable for their crimes.


Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
23. There are provisions in the law for it
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:37 PM
Jan 2012

However, as usual the Shrub administration took a valid purpose and perverted it for their own fucked up political gains.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
26. I didn't know that. I remember working in a contract office for the military clubs and when you
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:40 PM
Jan 2012

wanted something you had to put out open bids. They always took the cheapest bid. Of course that was back in the mid 70s. The way they are doing it now why bother putting bids out if they are going to give it to their buddies.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
28. The system should be flexible to allow for it
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:48 PM
Jan 2012

The competitive bidding system takes time and cost money. In the vast majority of situations it is the appropriate way to go, but there are circumstances that require urgency or there may be only one company that can provide the services required. Going through the bid process would be counterproductive. As expected, Shrub used these exclusions as a way to back door large Republican donors with huge contracts. With the GOP in control of all three branches of government, there was little to stop them.

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
27. Which just goes
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:47 PM
Jan 2012

To show how useless these types of labels are when trying to discuss politics rationally. Don't get me wrong, this kind of crap can be a real barrel of monkeys under certain conditions. But when attempting to find optimum solutions for the problems we face as a nation, they're pretty lame.

All the accusations, finger pointing, categorizing, and payoffs are not going to get us 1 inch closer to the kind of nation we want to leave our kids.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»的f Obama is the food sta...