Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:35 PM Feb 2013

Deep reflection time: what's "rich"?

We all want to tax the rich? What IS that?

There is "rich" and "wealthy." Wealthy just means you have a high net worth.

I believe you need three things to be rich.

First, you need enough money that it's not a controlling factor in your life. This is a hard number to pin down because everyone is different. Some people can be here making $25,000 per year. Other people could make $250 million a year and still be controlled by their money; Mitt Romney and Donald Trump come to mind.

Second, more than half of your income is from investments.

And third, your lifestyle wouldn't be diminished if you stopped working.

This doesn't take a huge amount of money. And high income could preclude you from being rich - earn $1 million from work, $500,000 from investments, and your lifestyle would radically change if work went away.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
4. I wonder how many of those are paper rich
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:38 PM
Feb 2013

Romney is paper rich. Most of his wealth is in stock. Mitt Romney is worth between $250m and $1b but he probably couldn't put his hands on $20m without selling a lot of stock. Remember when Ann said they had to scrape by in college by selling stock? Scraping by is right; Romney, in the final analysis, has no money. What he has is paper worth what someone says it is, and it could be worth $100 a ton if an exact set of catastrophes happens.

One of America's big problems is the overabundance of paper rich.

 

rabid_byter

(40 posts)
2. the richest 20% hold 95.4% of the Financial wealth in the USA, poorest 80% have 4.6%
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:43 PM
Feb 2013

sorry, but this is a little easier to understand..

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

actually... the richest 20% hold 95.4% of the Financial wealth in the USA, poorest
80% hold 4.6% of financial wealth and the poorest 50% hold 2.5%

SO THERE IS NO MIDDLE CLASS.!! QUIT USING THAT TERM.!! makes you a slave to ignorance

it is a mind control trick to make you think you aren't being SCREWED every second of your life.!! by the rich who are so taped out they cant afford to PAY TAXES. the reason there is a recession.. and only in the underclasses is there a recession..is because they tie up all the cash in their mentally ill OCD cleptocratic plutocratic quest to acquire more needless wealth and power at the expense of the underclass. humm isn't that the definition of Fascism.??

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
3. +1
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:56 PM
Feb 2013

The so-called middle class actually = the top 20% - 1%.

1% = the beginning of hailing distance of the rulers of the universe in the top .01%.

The top 19% serves them. Like courtiers in the time of Louis XVI.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
8. It's relative. Relative to where and how you live.
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:25 PM
Feb 2013

All three of your "criteria" could be true for someone with a net worth of $10.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
9. Maybe not $10
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 05:26 AM
Feb 2013

One important thing about soaking The Rich: seriously rich people have relatively low incomes. They incorporate their wealth and only draw off what they need to live. Reinvestment is the key to grand riches.

Go after the high income earners. And soak the rich too.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
11. I am inclined to use net worth as a measure as well.
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 08:28 AM
Feb 2013

If net worth grows year over year but income does not keep pace with the growth, you know something is going on under the covers.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
10. I think "your lifestyle wouldn't be diminished if you stopped working" is a bogus measure
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 08:15 AM
Feb 2013

That means that people who currently spend more than their investment income cannot be rich, even if their investment income is huge. Yes, someone with half a million of investment income is rich, whether or not they have a job too, and whether or not they spend more than that half million.

You appear to want to redefine "rich" as "content about the amount of money they own". If you want that re-definition, then you have to throw away the claim that "we all want to tax the rich".

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
13. Rich
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 10:43 AM
Feb 2013

if you could stop working tomorrow and still have income higher than the median income, then you are rich.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Deep reflection time: wha...