General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen expect sex after expensive dinner dates: study
When it comes to the dating game, men are only happy to splash cash as they try to get women into bed.
One in five men said that he expects sex if he spends more than 100 pounds on dinner, the Daily Express reported.
It sometimes works, as seven percent of women say they feel obliged to sleep with a man who has been so generous.
....
Women typically wont consider sleeping with a man until they have been on at least five dates, the study of 2,000 people by internet network MSN.co.uk found.
Half of men will happily spend more than 50 pounds on a first meeting, with couples splitting the bill from the second date onwards. But just three percent of women pay the bill on the first date.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/SexAndRelationships/Men-expect-sex-after-expensive-dinner-dates-study/Article1-1031114.aspx
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)musette_sf
(10,198 posts)intheflow
(28,442 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)They're men, they're men, and they're men?
demwing
(16,916 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)better light than even some of you feel you are. i have a much higher expectations of your abilities than some of you feel you have with yourself. i think much more of you, than some of you think of yourself. often i am standing up for man, against man.
i guess it is all in the eye of the beholder.
because you feel challenging sexism/misogyny is manhating, many more men recognize that it is only cause the majority do not need to denigrate women to feel like a man, meh....
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)out rants.
"seabeyond (84,528 posts)
30. yes. how men that think "all women are whores one way or another" justifies their little joke"
...You fall on the ranting side. Pity because by doing so you actually trivialize real problems.
You catch more flies with honey if you took a softer tone, than with your current approach. However that would mean you would have to come to a personal realization that 99% of the gentlemen on this board are not your enemy.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cause that joke has been around for decades, that i know of. you know. whether a prostitute, a date or marriage, the man is paying for it.
are we going to pretend this is not said often, and loudly with guffaws of laughter?
that we have not seen it on du often?
that this is not being said in this very thread?
yes, some men like to pretend that they do not get it. and most men are honest enough to acknowledge it.
that is a rant to you?
the poster you defend purposely pretends he does not get the OP. he is being dishonest. yet, you are insulting me and personally attacking me while i discuss the issue.
brilliant.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)post everywhere?
Even this conversation you present is laced with dregs of bitterness.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)my reply to you, again.
as far as tone? ya. those that refuse to address the issue choose to use the derailing of "tone", to ignore what is being said. that is so old and tired.
oh, should i say, i typed that softly and gently.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)is the moment that every woman knows exactly what role you are requiring them to play for you.
Good luck with that.
SmileyRose
(4,854 posts)good luck is right.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Keep at it, I'm sure someday you'll actually craft something biting.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Keep trying
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)"enemy" to ALL of us, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. Patriarchy is an arbitrary social construct that keeps our species mired in aggression and inequality. It is a key reason we admire strong, assertive Type-A personalities (predominantly associated with males) and denigrate weak, compliant, nonaggressive personalities (predominantly associated with females).
It is ALSO a reason why some of us, who've been irretrievably damaged by patriarchy, vociferously defend it's ravages or deny that they exist.
I strongly encourage you to understand that seabeyond's advocacy for the abolition of patriarchy does not equal hatred of men (a stance used historically to keep "uppity women" in "their place" .
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)thanks woman.
edit... OMG, forgot. SOME men. only SOME men. not ALL men. really.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)so many DUers posting herein devolve the discussion into snarks or defensive denials. I am dismayed that we're still seeing these attitudes on a Democratic website. Sadly, as I've said before, sexism and misogyny are pervasive on the innertubes...
Squinch
(50,911 posts)where a male poster said he didn't think women understood how difficult it is to be a man?
A lot of us pooh-poohed that, but I would say that that is proof of what you are saying. That was a guy who had imposed a bunch of rules onto himself, all of them the result of believing in patriarchal teachings. He clearly disliked the position those rules put him into, and felt they were a burden and unfair.
We may argue over whether he was imposing those rules on himself, or whether the culture was imposing them on him. But I think his statement supports your assertion. The patriarchical notions we all still harbor, consciously or not, are absolutely destructive, to everyone, not just women.
The fight against those patriarchal notions benefits both men and women in really significant ways. Turning away from patriarchy is actually a very supportive act toward men as well as women.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)"pick a fight with seabe underground". BTW she's a very important contributor here.
Let's discuss the topic, not each other.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)club women over the head, drag them back to the cave and mate with them until dawn. You got it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ever. didnt seem to be the "mans" job. i hear men insist on paying, yet i hear the same men gripe about it later. i hear too many men have a problem with it.
intheflow
(28,442 posts)I totally get where you're coming from. Because I'm poor I would let a date buy me a cup of coffee but not anything more unless we'd been dating at least a few times. Even now that I'm living with my boyfriend I struggle with the fact that I don't make enough money to move if anything should ever happen to him. He thinks it's a bit paranoid on my part, but I'd be homeless without being able to live at his house paying only $500/mo. toward the mortgage and utilities. There's no way I could find that in my area and still be able to keep my dog, feed us both, pay my car insurance and my other bills. Absolutely hate that I don't make enough to be autonomous!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. men see it as buying sex.
2. i generally made as much or more, so why should they pay.
3. i do not like owing anyone anything.
4. men gripe about having to pay for a date.
we are talking dates. you are in a relationship. i hear ya. but, i do not put that in the same place as a date.
intheflow
(28,442 posts)Apparently I needed more sleep and/or coffee for reading comprehension to kick in!
Warpy
(111,138 posts)It's better to put it right on the table, literally, that we're not for sale, especially not for a dinner and/or some sort of entertainment.
It would be nice if more of them cared for the pleasure of our company but we're not there yet.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)Or you're not looking for a long term relationship.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)a bottle of wine. 20-30 for each entree, 30 for a bottle of wine and with tax and tip you are at 100 dollars or 100 pounds. If anyone has an appetizer, you are now above 100.
Those are average restaurant prices in those cities.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)Have a cup of coffee, chat a bit, get to know each other.
If you still like each other, then plan on dinner.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)1 in 5 is too many, but that headline implies something different.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Maybe the title is a bit misleading?
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Most people who own guns don't shoot people with them, but we treat most with guns as though they will or are the same.
Not to mention, if people only read headlines that is not my fault.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)To get people to read your OP.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)As many sites require that when posting it is just habit (I don't always do but quicker to do so).
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #4)
markiv This message was self-deleted by its author.
treestar
(82,383 posts)we don't need to jump on men over this study.
BeyondGeography
(39,345 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)as the group in general (when it supports the argument they want to make). I hope this isn't something that's contagious.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)yourout
(7,524 posts)I could drop a $1000.00 and if she ain't in the mood.....she ain't in the mood.
FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)If I spent $100 of our money on dinner, my wife would be so ticked that there would be no chance of getting her in the mood. Now a well prepared picnic at a pleasant park...that might spark some serious action later.
LiberalFighter
(50,783 posts)Just as financial status or the event might dictate response. There are exceptions to everything.
If the event was just a night out that would be different for anniversary, birthday or other special occasion.
PCIntern
(25,477 posts)She is pretty willful that way.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Sorry yourout, but that was pretty funny.
yourout
(7,524 posts)WCLinolVir
(951 posts)Like she has a will that can not be manipulated by you and you might be bemoaning the fact.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)JesterCS
(1,827 posts)Skittles
(153,111 posts)Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...to you both. Just sayin'
yourout
(7,524 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)expensive restaurant until we have established more of a relationship than a first date. In any case, I've never expected sex in return for anything. Sex isn't a bargaining thing, as far as I'm concerned. It is an expression of something, not just a recreational activity.
Anyhow, that's how I've always seen it. My first dates generally have been doing something together that doesn't cost much, but that allows for considerable conversation and is intended to get to know the other person. Of course, I've been married now for a long time, so maybe things have changed out there.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)that involve large expenditures. It's better that those first dates don't set up unrealistic expectations.
Now, I'm not saying that first dates don't sometimes end up with two people getting naked together. That often happens, despite no money being spent on that first date.
I will not share any such stories, though. I'll save those for the Penthouse Forum.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and we are still married.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)I remember a first date that went very well. It was with the woman who became my first wife. We were married for 17 years. I was flat broke most of the time, and attending college on the GI Bill. I had met her in a couple of classes we had together, and couldn't figure out what sort of date we might go on.
I was an avid angler though, so I asked her if she'd like to go fishing. Pretty weird, huh? Well, she said that she'd never been fishing and that it sounded like fun. So we went fishing. The place was a rugged, rocky Pacific coast shoreline, where I could absolutely guarantee success. She caught fish until her arms were really tired. Then, we went back to the house I lived in and I cooked part of our catch and made a very nice dinner for the two of us. Afterwards...well, that's a different story, but we got married a few months later.
Hekate
(90,552 posts)I've been married a long time, too, and so glad not to be in the dating game.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)flames you might see here? Got your marshmallows out?
Well, I'm moving along. This is like googly eyed 13 year old boy stuff.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)See I post a lot of things.
Posted about 50 catholic churches being burned down/destroyed over hatred of them.
No one replied.
Post about sex, penis size, breast size. People reply.
So I post a whole cross section and let people choose.
I see which you have chose to reply to.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Oops, my bad. It was Catholic churches. That explains it.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Sex sells, even on DU.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I find it depressing that so many men are so sleazy.
ananda
(28,834 posts)Ugh
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)on dinner, the Daily Express reported. It sometimes works, as seven percent of women say they feel obliged to sleep with a man who has been so generous.
-----
"Hey, beautiful, can I buy you a drink?"
"Yeh, OK".
"Want another. gorgeous?"
"Sure, thanks".
"You know, you have the most beautiful eyes...can I buy you one more?"
"OK."
"How about I get us a motel room?"
"Oh, sorry, I don't think so. I'm lesbian."
"Uh...oh, well, doesn't matter to me."
"It's late, I gotta go, thanks for the drinks...take care."
"Sure you don't want another?"
Never give a sucker an even break.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)What's the difference between that and being a prostitute? I see no difference... except one doesn't have to share with her pimp or walk the streets to find a partner.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...Unless a woman's ideal is an expensive dinner, better to skip the meal and ask for the cash. Then she can use it to pay the rent or fix her car. Of course, the more interesting question to me is why the guy would go on a date and pay for dinner to get sex rather than pay a prostitute. I mean, a random girl can't possibly guarantee good professional sex like a prostitute; why waste the money on anything less than a woman with training and experience and who isn't going to keep calling you if that's all you're after?
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Think I'll stay home and eat in. lol
Tom Rinaldo
(22,911 posts)And then we can all go dutch on dates.
RC
(25,592 posts)Minimum wage is the new glass ceiling for both men and women.
Ter
(4,281 posts)I always have to pay on the date. Maybe well into the relationship, but at first, it's all me. And for the record, I don't expect anything.
Skittles
(153,111 posts)except I am female
Initech
(100,036 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)The nerve of men to actually seek women with sexual interaction in mind. And buying them expensive dinners? Will the suffering never end? All men should hang their heads in shame because 1 in 5 rich guys has something in mind when they go on expensive dates.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... fuck are you yammering on about?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)you can watch them bonding over it. Just like in real life.
Well, maybe "like" isn't the right word.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)As a sex, as social creatures, we are base thugs raised by women hating men to hate women. At every point in our lives we rape the minds and bodies of women. If not overtly, in ways so imperceptible that they always pass under the radar. And all of these attacks and resentment aggregate and compound into the gigantic monster of the Patriarchy.
Men always benefit from this kind of mockery. We rally around our stupidity and thugishness so that we feel justified in our actions. All the while attacking any protest of our sophomoric horseshit as "reactionary" or uppity. All of this snowballs until we reach a point when the mutual masturbating can't be stopped. Men who are maybe more decent than others look at it and they can't see through the fog of their own ignorance. So they say or do nothing. Eventually even the decent men will have built up such a tolerance that the movement sees they are ripe for "salvation." They are baptized and become another one of the boys.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)There is a vein in our culture that does what you say. And it isn't only men. There are women who feel they can gain some form of ascendency over other women by joining the mockery with the men whose motivation comes from fear of women as equals.
But there is also another vein in our culture. Though we don't acknowledge it as much, it is as strong here in DU as the mysogynists. It is made up of men AND women who are learning how to express equality, how to respect and encourage each other, and how to extract the patriarchal views from where they have wormed their ways into our psyches. I consider myself to be hands down feminist, and I'm no spring chicken, but I am still learning things here all the time about how to be more respectful of the equality between women and men.
We are lucky here to have some brave souls who point out things that make us uncomfortable, and make us challenge beliefs we have taken for granted, and take us, kicking and screaming, further down that road.
Don't be ashamed to be a man. We are happy you're here, and that we are all progressing together. This process, if you step outside of the terrible frustration we feel being inside it, is actually pretty beautiful.
We'll all get there.
i probably needed this post right this minute, more than gravity.
really.
i loved your post in so many ways. and especially in the overall collective conscious that we are.
thank you for the reminder and graceful manner you gave it.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)had to read it twice.
i have seen particular behavior the last couple weeks, exactly as you describe, pretty much exclusively toward me, lol. and i have been pondering.
thanks.
may even re read a third time
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)The fourth rule of Bushido.
IV. Politeness
Politeness should be the expression of a benevolent regard for the feelings of others; its a poor virtue if its motivated only by a fear of offending good taste. In its highest form Politeness approaches love.
I don't consider myself overly polite though. Lots of room for improvement.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)That happens to them a lot.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i am not much for pretending. to many like to. i call it lying.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)"Hopes for" would not be a problem, but thinking they're entitled to sex if they spend a certain amount is why it's a story.
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. would you please?
Like some women don't use their sexuality to get what THEY want.
Bwahhahahahahhahahahhahahh!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Someone thinking he's entitled to sex if he's spent a certain amount of money is not the same as someone using sexuality to get what they want. Nor does the fact that some people use sex to get what they want make it OK for other people to think they are entitled to sex if they spend a certain amount of money.
treestar
(82,383 posts)You don't give it up until the money is really good (i.e. marriage) or you are called a slut.
So say the woman doesn't need that money spent on her to give it up? You don't call her any names, right?
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)to have sex with you. Uh...oldest profession, eh? Feh!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Or how about:
Put words in other peoples mouths much?
Feh! yourself, you self-righteous pretender.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Denial 101
Iggo
(47,534 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'd call other people self-righteous too... if the alternative was that I was an idiot, saying idiotic things, and trying to justify them.
Good luck with all that!
theKed
(1,235 posts)any surveys have been done to gauge what percentage of women expect an expensive date before they'll sleep with a man.
Botany
(70,447 posts)men ask women on dates w/the idea of having sex on their minds.
BTW 100 pounds = $152.00
London $67.69 $142.40 average meal costs the low figure is for an average restaurant and the higher one is for top place
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I respond the same to someone else. "Hopes for" would not be a story. But to feel entitled to sex if you spend a certain amount of money is the issue.
Botany
(70,447 posts)some women look forward to sex after a date too .....
gollygee
(22,336 posts)It's about whether someone feels entitled to sex. Do you understand the difference between the two?
Botany
(70,447 posts)No please explain it to me. BTW do I need to add this?
This is a big old non story. Sometimes people have sex after a date and
sometimes people do not have sex after a date and sometimes one person
wants to have sex and sometimes the other person does not want to have sex
and sometimes one person spends money and or their time in order to increase
the chances of having sex and sometimes that doesn't work and sometimes sex
results in a baby being made and sometimes no baby is made after sex and
sometimes one person on a date in London is thinking boy this beef Wellington
tastes great as the other person is thinking that she told her date before they
went out she was a vegan so watching him eat beef really turns her off and
sometimes one person is thinking the last time he/she took a man/woman to
a fancy joint he/she wound up knocking boots afterwords and sometimes
one person likes to sit in a bath tube filled with luke warm cream of wheat
as his or her date sings Camptown Ladies ......
gollygee
(22,336 posts)but you claim to understand the difference. It isn't about having sex or not, or wanting to have sex or not, or increasing the chances of having sex or not. It isn't about preferences. It's about whether people believe they are entitled to sex if they spend a certain amount of money. Whether the other person has the right to say no or not.
Botany
(70,447 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)You keep saying you get it, some people want sex some people don't, but you don't say a word about the belief that someone is entitled to sex if they spend a certain amount, which is the point of the whole thing.
Botany
(70,447 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Fuck the dinner, I would rather spend a night hanging out with the dog.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I think I would rather order in and not have to deal with the whole situation. And cuddle with a cute, loving dog!
Botany
(70,447 posts).... can you walk the dog too? I am beat.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Botany
(70,447 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Besides, if you're spending the equivalent of 100 pounds on a date just to get laid, you're doing it wrong.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I think more than 1 out of 5 men hope a date will lead to sex and don't need to spend a certain amount to hope that.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's the least she can do.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)step in it all.
These guys are saying: "So I spend a lot of money and think that's going to tip the scales in my favor. What's so bad about that?"
I (and it seems you) are remembering times when we have been called names or worse when we didn't come across after some guy bought us an unrequested expensive dinner and thought we owed sex to him.
I think that's what they are missing. Some may be honestly missing it. And some of them are "missing" it very, very strenuously. Which makes me wonder if we met them on those very same dates.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Not that there was any basis in reality for me to think that way. I just thought my line of bullshit would get the job done even though it rarely did.
When my daughter got to be about 15 and started bringing boys around, I realized that the young me wasn't somebody I admired very much.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)That's when I knew she was the one... it also might explain why... ah... never mind...
edbermac
(15,933 posts)I love internet studies.
olddots
(10,237 posts)I would expect to have sex with the food .
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)And water is wet.
I wonder how much they spent on this study.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)That's a minority, and saying 'men' like that makes it sound like a majority.
flvegan
(64,405 posts)Demoiselle
(6,787 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)It should have said "some" or something, since it's well well fewer than 50%. Or even 20%. It seems like to generalize to just "men", it should be a strong "most", so well over 50%.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)If all you want is sex, we might as well just determine the price and my interest up front. I would be unimpressed with the outlay of all that money for a meal anyways.
polly7
(20,582 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)Iggo
(47,534 posts)The howwuh. The howwuh.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Kind of tough to rationalize it, much better to trivialize it instead lest we look like an idiot.
Same results, yet we can justify one in public.
antigone382
(3,682 posts)I mean, I'm glad that 80% of men in this study don't think that a night of big spending entitles them to sex is a good thing in a sense...but at the same time, not making demands on what I do with my body based on your budgetary choices is kind of a bare minimum when it comes to respect, don'tcha think? The fact that I've got 1 in 5 odds of encountering a guy who might think his behavior will oblige me to give it up is troubling.
In my experience men who feel entitled to sex in exchange for money or favors are not content to let you decline their "generosity" either--when I was younger and more timid there were definite cases of men heavily pressuring me to accept their "generosity" with the obvious expectation that I would return the favor... I was savvy enough to make it clear that I did *not* ask for their charity and I did *not* like getting into situations where I "owed" someone, but because I didn't refuse them outright (and in a sane world who would refuse a favor that someone else insisted on doing for them?), they got miffed with me later on when I did not give them what they wanted, and acted as if I had deceived them. Fortunately I was lucky enough to avoid situations where they could have used force, but it does occur to me that some of them might not have had many moral qualms about it if they had the opportunity. After all, they "deserved" it after they had carefully set up the situation so they could claim I owed it to them.
Iggo
(47,534 posts)I guess I got suckered by the misleading headline. I thought for sure, based on the headline, that it was going to be a strong majority turning out to be assholes. Then when I saw it was only one in five, that number was so much smaller than I expected that I gave it the pshaw treatment. One in five is still too many.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)considering how those "expectations" are expressed.
The women here, on the other hand, seem to get that those "expectations" often lead to arguments, name calling, verbal or physical coercion, and sometimes much worse.
Also, those posting who don't understand that an expensive dinner doesn't entitle them to anything need to do some serious growing up.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)for those of us who've survived date rape or attempted date rape, "studies" and "percentages" do not lessen or mitigate the pain and the challenges of recovery.
aquart
(69,014 posts)Or, as my sister used to say to me, "Get the steak FIRST."
GETPLANING
(846 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)want to fart loudly and go to sleep.
goodthanksandyou
(180 posts)For 20 minutes.
After that, the date is over as far as I am concerned.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)after he had bought me a pizza slice and a movie ticket.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I'd worked about six night shifts and was so tired, after we talked about what would be good, I said 'you go ahead and order' and headed to the washroom, thinking I'd told him what I wanted. So, he orders a really nice steak dinner ........ for himself. For me ...... a nice salad and an extra plate! It was 'so good (I shit you not) that we knew each other enough we could share.' It was the third, and thanks to call display and my email block thingy ... the last, time I ever saw this person.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)There is an implicit set of rules for dating and and eventually marriage. Granted, none of this justifies rape, but I can see feeling put off if after a lot of attention she's unwilling to go any further physically.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)Men can expect all they want.
anyhoo...
Good OP, really.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,943 posts)...how many out of five women expect sex after an expensive dinner...
bluedigger
(17,085 posts)What is a second date, anyways?
Ian David
(69,059 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)I expect women to buy me an expensive dinner after sex.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Most unmarried men don't really even bother to socialize with you if it's not about the possibility that there might be sex.
temporary311
(955 posts)of married men.
raccoon
(31,105 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)to begin with. I've bought many meals for girl friends who I was not nor did I want to have sexual relations with, many times. I've never asked one of my opposite sex friends to share the cost of a meal nor will I. Right now my wife and I are spending a tad over a hundred bucks a week on average on groceries for the two of us and an occasional meal with friends.
Methinks this study is more bull shit than anything. Maybe I'm just different and if that is the case I've had a lot of guy friends who are just like me. I never expected sex from someone because of something I did for them, ever. Furthermore I won't be either. I've been offered sex before because I did something for a person of the opposite sex and yet have I taken them up on it. Never alienated our friendship because of that either. I enjoy giving a hand or doing something for someone when they can't for whatever reason do it themselves. I'm one of those persons who is blessed with the ability to do about anything that comes my way. Sex is not and never has been the end all for me. If the two of us aren't really into it I don't go there.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Still, I don' give it up ever' time just fer e fine piece of Halibut and an expensive Pinot... it really depen's on me mood.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Arcanetrance
(2,670 posts)Besides being a chef and knowing the workings of restaurant kitchens we usually end up with me cooking
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The only think I expect after an expensive dinner is a wee bit of heart-burn later that evening (is that helpful to the idiots who don't know the difference between "expect" and "hope" out any?).
I do however, like the pomp and circumstance of a fancy-schmancy restaurant, dressing in a nice suit and tie, putting-on-the-Ritz every now and then. We get to play Nick and Nora for a few hours... minus the dog and the criminals.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)A form of emotional laziness that most women are pretty much sick and tired of these days.
A man whose made a sexual and emotional connection with his intended mate AHEAD of time, you know
Actually working at it
Would never depend on an expensive meal to seal the deal.
Unless this guy is pretty contemptuous of women in general to begin with. The kind of guy that women should avoid in all cases.
alp227
(32,005 posts)It's the same mindset in the Steubenville boys, as extreme as it may sound.
Auggie
(31,133 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Auggie
(31,133 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)you can still get STDs if your protection breaks or some don't use it. Just saying. But then again I may be wrong since I am not experienced when it comes to sex. I grew up sadly sheltered and very old fashioned when it comes to sex. I waited until I was married and have been married 35 yrs. But now I realize that today is a different time. I think if people are going to have sex then please protect yourself. But bed hopping is no way for a person to go either.
Auggie
(31,133 posts)your response is a bit unexpected since the thread topic isn't about STDs.
But that doesn't make your point any less important.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm not telling you anything else.
dembotoz
(16,785 posts)shoulda saved the money
yellowcanine
(35,693 posts)That's not bad actually. Hopefully the men who think this way land dates with the one in 5 women they deserve.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)The headline is pretty misleading if you read the article.
temporary311
(955 posts)Probably wouldn't garner as much attention.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)sad, really...
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)...Are folks usually getting it on after a good buffet?
More like a nap...
Exultant Democracy
(6,594 posts)And 5 dates? I won't even go on a first date unless I've already slept with the person.
JVS
(61,935 posts)It helps work up an appetite and you don't have to worry about the dinner making you gassy.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)to sit through a whole dinner with them.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, what's the point of fine dining if you can't break a few plates.
remdi95 remdi95 bam cha bam thats what im sayin
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Big difference, and the arguments in this thread all seem to depend on semantics.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)The word 'expect' is what has everyone riled up here. If they had used term 'hopes for' instead that may have changed the poll results and turned down the outrage some. But are we even defining the word 'expects' right? For example "I expect sex on my birthday". Well, I do. Because I have always gotten it in the past. Does that mean that I 'demand' sex on my birthday or I'll just force my wife to have sex with me on my birthday? No, I'm just used to getting it so I expect it.
Is it possible that's what the men who were polled were thinking? Maybe when they have taken out women in the past and spent 'x' amount of money they have always ended up in bed at the end of the night. So now when asked if they buy a women an expensive dinner on a first date they reply " I expect sex".
jessie04
(1,528 posts)nt
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)That's the conclusion of my study anyways. It was always, "this place isn't as nice as where we went last time...." or "I know you can afford more than just 1/4 carat diamond earrings for my birthday after where you've been taking me for dinner."
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)lasting through multiple dates with some pretty crappy people.
SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)Water is wet, and the sky is blue.
They really had to do a study to figure this out?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)dawg
(10,621 posts)that someone only wanted to have sex with me because of the money I spent on her. Or that she didn't really want me at all, but felt obligated because I bought her a nice meal.
If I buy you a nice meal, it's because I want us to enjoy a nice meal together.
I honestly don't understand some men. Why would anyone want to bribe or coerce someone into having sex with them? Isn't that just admitting that you are an unsexy loser?
I want a woman to want me for the intense, kind, introspective, occasionally charming man that I am. And if she doesn't want me for the right reasons, then I don't want her. Maybe I'll find the right woman somewhere else down the line.
Admittedly though, I am still a failure at relationships, while many of these jerkish men have lots of dates. But that doesn't matter. I would rather be left alone for being the man that I am than to be loved for being mistaken for something I am not.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)(Do I really need the sarcasm tag?)
In all seriousness, though, if I buy dinner for a date, the only thing I'd expect out of her would be some lively conversation--something I would hope everyone would want. Never in a million years would I even entertain the idea of "expecting" a woman to have sex with me because I bought her dinner. They're people--not machines you put kindness coins into so that sex falls out.
Rex
(65,616 posts)before, during and after dinner. No matter how cheap or expensive it was. Men that expect a,b or c after x,y or z aren't really men now are they? Just boys daydreaming about getting their ego stroked.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)NBA superstars? Hollywood?
sfpcjock
(1,936 posts)only if she's into it. You can ask!