Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 03:11 PM Jun 2013

Charles Koch said, "I want my fair share - and that's all of it."

In football terms, "piling on" means jumping on a player when he's down. In the economic new normal described by Bernie Sanders, it means taking most of the wealth and all of the income, moving profits and jobs overseas, and making impoverished people pay the bills.


1. Wealth Grab

According to an AP report, the stock market has regained all its losses since March, 2009 while adding an extra 18 percent. That's $11 trillion restored, plus almost $2 trillion gained. Using Economic Policy Institute figures (Tables 6 & 7), we can determine the beneficiaries of the new wealth:

The richest 1%, 1.15 million families with 38.3% of the stocks, each regained their losses and added an additional $666,000.
The next 2-5%, 4.6 million families with 30.9% of the stocks, each regained their losses and added an additional $134,000.
The rest of the top 20%, 17.25 million families with 22% of the stocks, each regained their losses and added an additional $25,500.
The 30% just above the middle, 34.5 million families with 8.9% of the stocks, each regained their losses and added an additional $5,160.
The bottom 50%, 57.5 million families with 0% of the stocks, gained nothing.
2. Taking ALL the Income

Charles Koch said, "I want my fair share - and that's all of it." He's been getting his wish lately. In the first two years of the recovery, the richest 1% seemingly impossibly captured 121% of the income gains, while incomes for 99% of Americans declined, with the median household income dropping by 7.3 percent.

More and more people are working in respectable but low-wage positions in food service and retail. Low-income jobs ($7.69 to $13.83 per hour) made up 1/5 of the jobs lost to the recession, but accounted for 3/5 of the jobs regained during the recovery.

3. Corporate Betrayal

According to their own SEC reports, Citigroup, Pfizer, and Bank of America made much of their 2011-12 revenue in the U.S. (42%, 40%, and 82%, respectively). Yet they declared a total of $69 billion in foreign profits and losses of $19 billion in the United States.

As the big companies have been declaring themselves multinationals with no allegiance to the country that made them successful, they've also eliminated tens of thousands of U.S. jobs. Citigroup, Pfizer, and Bank of Americaare among the leading job cutters. The shock of the recession has allowed them to turn their backs on their country, and Americans are too bewildered (and ill-represented) to properly fight back.

4. Let the Hungry Pay

The massive four-year redistribution of wealth and income toward the top leaves bills to be paid. So Congress wants to cut food assistance. Nearly 47 million people get an average of less than $5 a day to eat, at a total 2012 cost of about $80 billion, which is about the same amount made by just twenty Americans from one year of investment income.

In the spirit of American independence, Republican Congressman Stephen Fincher of Tennessee quoted the Bible: "The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat." Fincher, along with all but one of his Congressional colleagues, failed to show up for a recent unemployment hearing. Hungry Americans remain at the bottom of the pile, getting crushed by arrogance and insensitivity.
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/18001-the-wealthy-grab-the-money-and-make-the-poor-pay-the-tab

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Koch said, "I want my fair share - and that's all of it." (Original Post) midnight Jun 2013 OP
I hate those people with an intensity that is unhealthy. MrSlayer Jun 2013 #1
+ A Brazillion DJ13 Jun 2013 #2
So I guess future generations will have to eat the wealthy Rex Jun 2013 #3
Exactly. ALEC-Laffer recommendations not only fail to predict positive results for state economies midnight Jun 2013 #4
And yet---no revolution. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #5
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
1. I hate those people with an intensity that is unhealthy.
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jun 2013

Loathe and despise don't even come close to describing how much I hate them and want horrible things to happen to them. To be that greedy, that selfish and that indifferent to others is as close to pure evil as one can get and I don't even believe in good/evil.

These people are the scum of the Earth. They should have to live like a minimum wage earner for a few months just to see what real life is like. Perhaps they'd learn a bit of compassion. I doubt they would but it is possible.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
3. So I guess future generations will have to eat the wealthy
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 04:26 PM
Jun 2013

since it is apparent the 1% is hellbent on destroying the 99%. THAT is all that will be left, no food or water. Just rich, meaty people and billions of impoverished starving children.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
4. Exactly. ALEC-Laffer recommendations not only fail to predict positive results for state economies
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 07:42 PM
Jun 2013

-- the policies they endorse actually forecast worse state out-comes for job creation and paychecks.




"Even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is cognizant of Wisconsin's dismal jobs record. A recent Chamber of Commerce report placed Wisconsin 44th in the country for overall economic performance, and for short-term job growth between September 2010 and November 2012 it ranked Wisconsin 50th out of 50. The Chamber report didn't place long-term job growth much better either, ranking Wisconsin at 45th out of 50. The report ranked Wisconsin 39th for its "business climate."


"Governor Walker was an ALEC member when he was a legislator, beginning in the nineties. Since becoming Governor in 2010, he has signed into law nineteen ALEC-related bills and budget provisions. These include economic measures such as the elimination of the capital gains tax, which is similar in effect to the ALEC "model" "Capital Gains Tax Elimination Act," and Walker included a provision in his first budget to reopen the corporate tax avoidance, or so called "Las Vegas Loophole," which is related to the ALEC "Resolution in Opposition to Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting."



The report argues that ALEC has its states upside down:

"A hard look at the actual data finds that the ALEC-Laffer recommendations not only fail to predict positive results for state economies -- the policies they endorse actually forecast worse state out-comes for job creation and paychecks. That is, states that were rated higher on ALEC's Economic Outlook Ranking in 2007, based on 15 'fiscal and regulatory policy variables,' have actually been doing worse economically in the years since, while the less a state conformed with ALEC policies the better off it was."

http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/05/12124/walkers-dismal-jobs-performance-gets-gold-star-alecs-rich-states-poor-states-repo

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Koch said, "I wan...